You also did not give any context to why you were posting. Sometimes things just do not stand on their own.
A mother is very protective of her children. The comment was not directed to my children but it was directed at someone's child. A man who is not here to defend himself. When we talk about some one to point out faults we think they have, it is gossip, I think particularly detraction.
This is the post in question
He almost certainly does think these things.
Or else is he is probably quasi ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ.
I am sorry if I misunderstood you, but I just wanted to set the record straight.
Thank you for providing the previous comments (I did read it) and yes, I understand mothers are protective, but mothers often let this nurturing nature blind them. I could have given further context, but to me it was quite evident that all I wanted to share was something written by a saint. With a little bit of thinking it seems to me easy to understand the point I was making, I suppose I assume people think deeper than what happens in reality. In my observations, traditional catholics are always ready for a fight, to defend themselves, and assume that when someone comments on their post, that it is in opposition to them automatically. Not every conversation is a battle, and one does not need to be on edge like that all the time; it's not healthy. It is important to read things for what they are, not what you are looking for or expecting.
I also believe you don't realize that the man who made the quasi ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ remark was not falsely accusing someone else's
adult child of anything, he was merely making the point that
if a man were to think certain things, he would be a quasi ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, which is a term to express a certain level of effeminacy. This is not detraction. The man who made the long post was essentially stating that your lack of ability to understand what people (especially men) mean to convey gets you into trouble, because you begin attacking a non existent fault in the other person.