Author Topic: The Prophecies Of Alois Irlmaier (Read 90284 times)

IMPERATOREBT · « **Reply #10 on:** October 20, 2011, 06:03:30 AM »

From what I've read, that is when the Great Monarch rises and restores order who restores the Holy Roman Empire, is a Frank with the symbol of the Fleur de Lis and fights with the zeal of El Cid. He then marches his armies from the Iberian Peninsula all the way to Russia and converts them along with the Chinese to Roman Catholicism and recaptures Jerusalem.

Is there a rough timeline as to when these things were to pass? Because I personally think that these things are around the corner.

This war against Iran might push these things into effect. Russia and China have diplomatic and military alliances with Iran and have threatened to retaliate against the West if US NATO/UN and Israel attack Iran.

Ethelred · « **Reply #11 on:** October 20, 2011, 07:52:55 AM »

There's a topic about The Great Monarch in particular, here on Cathinfo where you can find some interesting texts.

I didn't find anything in Irlmaier's visions about the great monarch who's a French Frank uniting the entire Europe and even recapturing Jerusalem. What you mention sounds like a certain Emperor with divine help at the end of time, whilst Irlmaier foresaw a period which is not the end of time.

Irlmaier foresaw an humble and ordinary German-speaking man coming from Austria (or Bavaria which is NOT Franken) who would be crowned by the pope (so be an emperor or at least a very important king) but wear his national costume Lederhosen! :-) Irlmaier suggests that this emperor doesn't originate in the nobility but in the ordinary folk which doesn't surprise if we look at the massive corruption of the remaining nobility. So Irlmaier's emperor is an unspectacular man with Lederhosen, but still a good catholic man, and I think this is great.

rowsofvoices9 · « **Reply #12 on:** October 20, 2011, 08:50:19 PM »

What is the Church's official stand on these prophecies of Alois Irlmaier? Have they been approved or condemned? I can't find anything on the internet saying that the local bishop ever gave approval. In fact I can only find the opposite. There are a couple of websites that have Mr. Irlmaier listed as being a false prophet who made false statements about the three days of darkness and the war which precedes it. This is entirely possible seeing that several other approved visionaries have made predictions about these events.

http://forumarchedemarie.forumperso.com/t2775-liste-de-faussaires-de-dieu

There are ample private revelations from fully approved sources that give a clear indication of what we can expect in the near future without chasing after ones that have never received any approbation from the Church. I personally would only give credence to the approved ones.

chaz89 · « **Reply #13 on:** October 21, 2011, 04:48:35 AM »

Quote from: rowsofvoices9

What is the Church's official stand on these prophecies of Alois Irlmaier? Have they been approved or condemned? I can't find anything on the internet saying that the local bishop ever gave approval. In fact I can only find the opposite. There are a couple of websites that have Mr. Irlmaier listed as being a false prophet who made false statements about the three days of darkness and the war which precedes it. This is entirely possible seeing that several other approved visionaries have made predictions about these events.

http://forumarchedemarie.forumperso.com/t2775-liste-de-faussaires-de-dieu

There are ample private revelations from fully approved sources that give a clear indication of what we can expect in the near future without chasing after ones that have never received any approbation from the Church. I personally would only give credence to the approved ones.

I knew it when I read the first line : " In my humble and pious opinion as a faithful Roman Catholic theologian, the following claims of private revelation..." - Ron Conte. He is anything but... He wouldn't know a false prophet anymore than anyone else.

He ought to list himself as a false prophet. He's made more than one prediction that hasn't come true. The "warning and the miracle" has been predicted more than 3 times in successive years. He claims he is humble and pious and is neither. He bases just about everything on Medjugorje , that satanic cult following "apparition" that is uncatholic is almost every way.
So, take this loser with a grain of salt.

http://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/blog.cfm?id=331

http://unamsanctamcatholicam.blogspot.com/2008/07/medjugorje-prognostications.html

sedetrad · « **Reply #14 on:** October 21, 2011, 10:19:49 AM »

Ethereld,

Thank you for your information in this man.

Andy