What he says makes a loooottt of connections with other prophecies i've read, especially the "nuke in the English channel" which explains St Patrick and St Malachys prophecies of Ireland being inundated before the end.
Quote from: IMPERATOREBT
What he says makes a loooottt of connections with other prophecies i've read, especially the "nuke in the English channel" which explains St Patrick and St Malachys prophecies of Ireland being inundated before the end.
Actually that's not correct. God promised St.Patrick that He would destroy Ireland 7 years before the antichrist would come. If it does happen now, then we are going to have a very very short triumph.
What is the Church's official stand on these prophecies of Alois Irlmaier? Have they been approved or condemned? I can't find anything on the internet saying that the local bishop ever gave approval. In fact I can only find the opposite. There are a couple of websites that have Mr. Irlmaier listed as being a false prophet who made false statements about the three days of darkness and the war which precedes it. This is entirely possible seeing that several other approved visionaries have made predictions about these events.
http://forumarchedemarie.forumperso.com/t2775-liste-de-faussaires-de-dieu
There are ample private revelations from fully approved sources that give a clear indication of what we can expect in the near future without chasing after ones that have never received any approbation from the Church. I personally would only give credence to the approved ones.
Quote from: rowsofvoices9What is the Church's official stand on these prophecies of Alois Irlmaier? Have they been approved or condemned? I can't find anything on the internet saying that the local bishop ever gave approval. In fact I can only find the opposite. There are a couple of websites that have Mr. Irlmaier listed as being a false prophet who made false statements about the three days of darkness and the war which precedes it. This is entirely possible seeing that several other approved visionaries have made predictions about these events.
http://forumarchedemarie.forumperso.com/t2775-liste-de-faussaires-de-dieu
There are ample private revelations from fully approved sources that give a clear indication of what we can expect in the near future without chasing after ones that have never received any approbation from the Church. I personally would only give credence to the approved ones.
I knew it when I read the first line : " In my humble and pious opinion as a faithful Roman Catholic theologian, the following claims of private revelation..." - Ron Conte. He is anything but... He wouldn't know a false prophet anymore than anyone else.
He ought to list himself as a false prophet. He's made more than one prediction that hasn't come true. The "warning and the miracle" has been predicted more than 3 times in successive years. He claims he is humble and pious and is neither. He bases just about everything on Medjugorje , that satanic cult following "apparition" that is uncatholic is almost every way.
So, take this loser with a grain of salt.
http://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/blog.cfm?id=331
http://unamsanctamcatholicam.blogspot.com/2008/07/medjugorje-prognostications.html
What is the Church's official stand on these prophecies of Alois Irlmaier? Have they been approved or condemned?
Quote from: Rowsofvoices9What is the Church's official stand on these prophecies of Alois Irlmaier? Have they been approved or condemned?
As far as I know there's no Church's official stand on the visions of Alois Irlmaier, because they've never been examined before the Church fell into paralysis mode due to Vatican II.
What Irlmaier foresaw are no private revelations in a strict sense but "just" pictures i.e. visions. I'm sure they're from above but I can't quote an official Church stand, just some traditional priests' judgement.
I don't know the website or authors' names you quoted. If they claim the Church had examined Alois Irlmaier's visions I'd be surprised and interested to see their proof.
You can always take Irlmaier's timetable and compare it to our time and its signs with your reason. Step 1 to 4 came to pass "successfully" and clearly we're in the middle of step 5 right now. I've no doubt that steps 6 and 7 will come to pass, too. But there's no need to convince anybody with Irlmaier. We will see soon for ourselves.
Bumping this thread...for the prophecies of Alois Irlmaier.In the meantime ......... https://twitter.com/AloisIrlmaier
In one of my previous posts I linked to the website http://www.catholicapologetics.info/catholicteaching/privaterevelation/apparitions.htm. Once again I apologize for this.
Although there is some useful information contained on this website, there is also a lot that that is downright wrong and dangerous for those new to Catholic tradition. The sections on the New Mass and Vatican II are highly problematical. Among the most glaring errors suggested is that Paul VI had no right to reform the Sacraments and by doing so they were rendered illicit and of doubtful validity. This is just one example of the many errors, there are a lot more. The opinions expressed in many of the articles tends to foster a schismatic attitude which could cause some to separate themselves from the Church.
BTW, I'm still having a problem believing these prophecies of Alois Irlmaier. I'm going to stick to the ones that have received full approval from the Church.
4. Then a large number of strangers come into the country.
5. There is high inflation.
6. The money will lose more and more value.
- 7. Soon afterwards follows the Revolution.
- 8. Then the Russians invade the West overnight
The New York Times has published an anonymously sourced report titled “U.S. Escalates Online Attacks on Russia’s Power Grid (http://archive.is/aFVzg)” about the “placement of potentially crippling malware inside the Russian system at a depth and with an aggressiveness that had never been tried before” which could potentially “plunge Russia into darkness or cripple its military,” with one anonymous official reporting that “We are doing things at a scale that we never contemplated a few years ago.”
Obviously this is yet another serious escalation in the continually mounting series of steps (https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/responses-to-this-tweet-show-how-people-fixate-on-narrative-over-fact-b43925719952) that have been taken into a new cold war between the planet’s two nuclear superpowers. Had a report been leaked to Russian media from anonymous Kremlin officials that Moscow was escalating its cyber-aggressions against America’s energy grid, this would doubtless be labeled an act of war by the political/media class of the US and its allies with demands for immediate retaliation.
“Two administration officials said they believed Mr. Trump had not been briefed in any detail about the steps to place ‘implants’ — software code that can be used for surveillance or attack — inside the Russian grid.
“Pentagon and intelligence officials described broad hesitation to go into detail with Mr. Trump about operations against Russia for concern over his reaction — and the possibility that he might countermand it or discuss it with foreign officials, as he did in 2017 when he mentioned a sensitive operation in Syria to the Russian foreign minister.
“Because the new law defines the actions in cyberspace as akin to traditional military activity on the ground, in the air or at sea, no such briefing would be necessary, they added.”
In an article titled “Pentagon Keeps Trump in the Dark About its Cyber Attacks on Russia (https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/pentagon-trump-cyber-attacks-on-russia-848695/)”, Rolling Stone’s Peter Wade described this jarring revelation as follows:Quote“New laws, enacted by Congress last year, allow such ‘clandestine military activity’ in cyberspace to go ahead without the president’s approval. So, in this case, those new laws are protecting American interests… by keeping the sitting president out of the loop. What a (scary) time to be alive.”QuotePentagon Keeps Trump in the Dark About its Cyber Attacks on Russia https://t.co/CJLFjbkR6x (https://t.co/CJLFjbkR6x) pic.twitter.com/TFYkTAcD0g (https://t.co/TFYkTAcD0g)
— Rolling Stone (@RollingStone) June 15, 2019 (https://twitter.com/RollingStone/status/1140025721936580608?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
So Trump is in a bit of a bind now. The escalation has already been put in place, which will likely see an equal response from Moscow if it isn’t scaled back. But scaling it back would mean a whole new wave of shrieking alarmism from the political/media class about the conspiracy theory that just won’t die no matter how much evidence is mounted against it: that Trump is a controlled puppet of the Kremlin. All as he’s working to build the case for re-election in 2020.
The man whose Twitter handle is "Alois-Irlmaier" has not posted for 7 months. He was always a prolific poster. Irlmaier told the nurse who attended him during his fatal illness in 1959 that she would live to see WWIII. Some years ago this lady was already in her nineties. It could well be that she has died and like the death of Joey Lomangino of Garabandal fame, her "premature" death has cast doubt on the whole Irlmaier prophecy thing.
But let’s wait and see. Alois’s next prediction is high inflation followed by hyper inflation. Another Judaic specialty.
VI. Irlmaier's famous timetable from the early 1950's
1. First there's an economic vitality like never before. [CHECK] prosperity worldwide for several generations after WW2
2. A lapse of faith follows, like never before. [CHECK] Vatican II->Bergoglio
3. Then a corruption of morals, like never before. [CHECK] 1960s->Amoris Laetitia->widespread sodomy & transgenderism
4. A huge number of strangers flood the country. [CHECK] immigrants flooding Europe and the US and everywhere else
5. It comes a massive inflation. Paper money looses its value more and more. [STARTING NOW]
6. Soon follows the revolution.
7. Then overnight the Russians raid the West.
(... meaning World War III which would be ended by the Three Dark Days)
VI. Irlmaier's famous timetable from the early 1950'sMy take: the massive inflation started a couple of decades ago with 9/11 and the revolution towards global Communism (Great Reset) was started with Covid.
5. It comes a massive inflation. Paper money looses its value more and more. Started after 9/11 and emerged in 2008
6. Soon follows the revolution. Started 2020 with the global COVID lie
7. Then overnight the Russians raid the West.
(... meaning World War III which would be ended by the Three Dark Days)
my comments in Bold above (excepting the title)
I started with "RED" also but it gets turned to black in qoted text. :laugh1:LOL right? I was wondering if I was doing something wrong myself.
According to Irlmaier, what kicks off the sudden Russian invasion is when some "Great One" gets αssαssιnαtҽd in the Balkans. Given that Russia reacts, and starts by wiping out Prague (the Golden City), I would venture to say it was a Russian diplomat (Putin himself?) murdered by someone from the Czech Republic (some diplomat?).In the auspices of Irlmaier, Putin is the only "Great One" I can think of in the current political charade. Zelensky doesn't quite fit the bill, BUT, given his recent popularity, maybe he is another candidate for the "Great One" as well.
“Poisoning, sudden illness, accident – Russia’s elite is considering removing Putin,” declared a Sunday Facebook post from the Chief Directorate of Intelligence for the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine.
The ministry claimed that a group of “influential people” has been forming in Russia who want to “remove Putin from power as soon as possible and restore economic ties with the West, which were destroyed by the war in Ukraine.”
I see a "large one" falling, a bloody dagger lies beside him - then impact is on impact. ..."
"Two men kill a third (who is) high ranked. They were paid by other people (to kill him). ..."
"The third murder occurred. Then the war starts. ..." (NOTE: / OBSERVATIONS: it must be a very high ranking world leader who is knifed to death that will start the war. Some accounts say this with be the third of three murders or three assasination attempts.)
"One of the murderers is a small black man, the other a little bit taller, with bright (light) colored hair. I think, it will be at the Balkans, but cannot say it exactly. ..."
It reminded me of what Alois Irlmaier said about the death of a "large one" which kicks things off towards the Chastisement:
note what is said about the Balkans on Russian State TV either today or yesterday
Well, the translations says Baltics, rather than Balkans, but it could be incorrect.oh yes you are right, I misread it.
(https://hungrynomads.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Baltics-vs-Balkans-with-a-map.jpg)
oh yes you are right, I misread it.
I guess Alois Irlmaier was NOT a Flat Earther. Interesting....very interesting. :cowboy:----> https://www.cathinfo.com/the-earth-god-made-flat-earth-geocentrism/ (https://www.cathinfo.com/the-earth-god-made-flat-earth-geocentrism/)
" I see the earth like a ball before me, on whom now the white pigeons fly near, a very large number coming up from the sand. And then it rains a yellow dust in a line. When the golden city is destroyed, it begins. Like a yellow line it goes up to the city in the bay. It will be a clear night, when they begin to throw it. The tanks are still driving, but those who sit in these tanks became quite black. Where it falls down, everything will be dead, no tree, no bush, no cattle, no grass, this becomes withered and black. The houses still exist. I don't know, what it is and so I cannot tell it. It is a long line. Who goes over this line, dies. The ones, who are on the one side cannot go over to the other side. Then everything at the spearheads breaks down. They all must go to the north. What they have with them, they throw away. Nobody will come back anymore... "
5. It comes a massive inflation. Paper money looses its value more and more.Was thinking about this yesterday….the events leading up to WW3. There is a missing piece here because when Alois talks about the start of WW3 and the graphic details, he says that right before the war starts “All calls peace, Shalom!”
6. Soon follows the revolution.
7. Then overnight the Russians raid the West.
(... meaning World War III which would be ended by the Three Dark Days)
Was thinking about this yesterday….the events leading up to WW3. There is a missing piece here because when Alois talks about the start of WW3 and the graphic details, he says that right before the war starts “All calls peace, Shalom!”
Was thinking about this yesterday….the events leading up to WW3. There is a missing piece here because when Alois talks about the start of WW3 and the graphic details, he says that right before the war starts “All calls peace, Shalom!”This is probably a bit of a stretch but could the revolutions Alois Irlmaeir speak of be the big demonstrations in European cities against the jab mandates along with the blm/Antifa riots in the U.S. and the trucker protests in Canada and elsewhere? Russia invading the West could be Russia invading Ukraine right now. So WW3 has already started and the hot part of the war will begin with the assassination of one or more 'big ones' which could happen after a short time of false peace supposedly brought about by 'pope Francis's' 'consecration'. This may all be a little far fetched I know.! ::)
This obviously means there is peace in the Middle East because he says war suddenly breaks out in the Middle East. So this means that somewhere between pt 5 and 6 above (or between 6 and 7), there will be some earthly peace of some kind.
Questions I have:
1. Does this “peace” come after the “consecration”? Is this peace an attempt to usher in the NWO in a positive light (ie through the new-age/Protestant/enlightenment model, where there is peace, security and a universal religion of “love”?)
2. Does this Middle East peace come before a global economic crash? (ie between pts 5 and 6)
3. Or does this Middle East peace come in the aftermath of economic chaos, and new satanic antipope, a global religion and new digital currencies? (ie between pts 6 and 7, which means the “peace” is the effect of the “revolution” that Alois mentions.
4. I’m leaning towards #3 above (unfortunately) because a) I don’t see how we can avoid economic chaos and b) though the events of WW3 are horrific they also lead to conversions of Russia and the destruction of evil. So in a sense, WW3 is where the elites (ironically) win and lose, which lines up with other prophecies. WW3 gives the blood-thirsty elites the chaos they want but it causes Russia to convert and then, eventually Europe and the rise of the Great Monarch.
So, ultimately the elites have their short-term victory in pt 6, the “revolution”, which also lines up with many prophecies. I’m just not sure where the “peace in the Middle East” and economic collapse fits in, in the timeline.
Would love to hear theories. Shalom! (a joke)
" I see the earth like a ball before me, on whom now the white pigeons fly near, a very large number coming up from the sand. And then it rains a yellow dust in a line. When the golden city is destroyed, it begins. Like a yellow line it goes up to the city in the bay. It will be a clear night, when they begin to throw it. The tanks are still driving, but those who sit in these tanks became quite black. Where it falls down, everything will be dead, no tree, no bush, no cattle, no grass, this becomes withered and black. The houses still exist. I don't know, what it is and so I cannot tell it. It is a long line. Who goes over this line, dies. The ones, who are on the one side cannot go over to the other side. Then everything at the spearheads breaks down. They all must go to the north. What they have with them, they throw away. Nobody will come back anymore... "
In 1981, the Soviet Union purportedly unleashed a fungal chemical weapon dubbed "Yellow Rain." The Wikipedia article has the basic info, but here is a bit more:
Well, the problem is that Irlmaier says that it's the adversaries of the Russians who use this yellow/green powder ... to cut off the spearheads from their supply lines.
I wasn't trying to claim Russia would cut itself off using this old Soviet weapon, but sharing something similar to what Irlmaier described. Admittedly, there are a lot of problems with the comparison, because it is not thought possible for a fungal chemical weapon to operate as quickly as described by Irlmaier's "yellow dust" weapon. He might have actually been referring to a more effective nerve agent, but of course, we can't really know. Some supposed (unverifiable) whistleblowers have claimed that the U.S. government attempted to reverse engineer the technology of the Soviet Union, including that of the gravely immoral type. It could be that the U.S. government secretly possesses a better version through these past efforts.
Right. I found the "yellow rain" stuff some time ago after reading Irlmaier, but it didn't quite seem to fit what he's describing, and I'm sure all sides have weapons we know nothing about. Effects kindof sound like what we'd see from a neutron bomb, where you have physical structures untouched, say vehicles, continuing to move, but the drivers inside dead ... except is sure looks more like some kind of chemical agent.
In agreement with the first two sentences. As for the rest, the neutron bomb part doesn't fit with "yellow dust" and a line of death that causes people to be "quite dark." Instant death and blackened (?) bodies only really fits with nuclear detonations when it comes to CBRN, but both the delivery system and line of death description fits better with a chemical weapon over a radiological one. I think we come to the same conclusion with your final clause concerning chemical agents.
Irlmaier's "quite black" and "withered and black" present difficulties if we take what he says literally. The weapon apparently kills instantaneously, can be spread along a line, seemingly does not spread from the line once dispersed, and causes both humans and other living things to blacken in appearance.
"Everything calls peace, Schalom! Then it will occur - a new Middle East war suddenly flames up, big naval forces are facing hostility in the Mediterranean - the situation is strained. But the actual firing spark is set on fire in the Balkan: I see a "large one" falling, a bloody dagger lies beside him - then impact is on impact. ..."
This is really interesting. I can't seem to find any information on this guy anywhere! Is he a Catholic? What is the Catholic Church's view on him?I do know he was using divining rods, which is a superstitious practice that the Church has condemned. (https://i.imgur.com/T2G7LIE.jpg)
Is he a psychic or a mystic, because there's a big difference. LOL
What he says does line up with dozens of Catholic Prophecies I've read, three days of darkness etc.
I do know he was using divining rods, which is a superstitious practice that the Church has condemned.
I do know he was using divining rods, which is a superstitious practice that the Church has condemned.
In 1914, as part of an interview and demonstration given to The Sun in New York von Graeve explained dowsing as follows:
"So far as it can be determined now I am susceptible to radioactivity to the alpha, beta and gamma rays discovered by Herz (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_Hertz) [sic (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sic)]... Our present guess is that there is a continuous current of these alpha, beta, gamma and other rays—radioactive waves—flowing up from underground. Where there is water, oil, gold, silver, or other mineral under the earth’s surface the flow up of the radioactive waves is disturbed. Either it is stopped entirely, or the waves are swung out of their course. That is because water, oil and the minerals are nonconductors of these waves."[1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Edler_von_Graeve#cite_note-dowser-1)
I do know he was using divining rods, which is a superstitious practice that the Church has condemned.Well that's interesting, I had not heard that.
...in a recent admirable Life of St. Teresa of Spain, the following incident is narrated: Teresa in 1568 was offered the site for a convent to which there was only one objection, there was no water supply; happily, a Friar Antonio came up with a twig in his hand, stopped at a certain spot and appeared to be making the sign of the cross; but Teresa says, "Really I cannot be sure if it were the sign he made, at any rate he made some movement with the twig and then he said, ' Dig just here '; they dug, and lo ! a plentiful fount of water gushed forth, excellent for 'drinking, copious for washing, and it never ran dry.' " As the writer of this Life remarks: "Teresa, not having heard of dowsing, has no explanation for this event", and regarded it as a miracle. This, I believe, is the first historical reference to dowsing for water.[16] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowsing#cite_note-Barrett_Psychical_Research_p171-16)[17] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowsing#cite_note-LaCEG-17)In 1662, divining with rods was declared to be "superstitious (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstition), or rather satanic (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satan)" by a Jesuit (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_of_Jesus), Gaspar Schott (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaspar_Schott), though he later noted that he was not sure that the devil (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devil) was always responsible for the movement of the rod.[18] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowsing#cite_note-IrMOB-18) In southern France in the 17th century, it was used to track criminals and heretics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heresy). Its abuse led to a decree of the inquisition (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition) in 1701, forbidding its employment for purposes of justice.[19] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowsing#cite_note-EB1911-19)
I do know he was using divining rods, which is a superstitious practice that the Church has condemned.
It's easy to write something off as "superstition" when modern "science" has no explanation for it. One could go through hundreds of different medical practices by various cultures that modern science claim were superstition, only to LATER discover that there was something to them. As some else posted here, there could be various scientific causes, and simply because we don't know what these are doesn't mean the practice is superstitious. These "divining" rods have been used for so long and by so many different cultures that there has to be something to it. They must have had a good amount of success with it, or the practice would not have survived.
What is the Church's official stand on these prophecies of Alois Irlmaier? Have they been approved or condemned? I can't find anything on the internet saying that the local bishop ever gave approval. In fact I can only find the opposite. There are a couple of websites that have Mr. Irlmaier listed as being a false prophet who made false statements about the three days of darkness and the war which precedes it. This is entirely possible seeing that several other approved visionaries have made predictions about these events.Irlmaier died in 1959. Are you waiting for these heretical modern popes to approve an apparition which goes completely against the Novus Ordo narrative? Remember, Papa Francis converted Russia and we are living in the era of PEACE! For the Church to approve Irlmaier is to imply that the Consecration of Russia was a giant sham. That's the way I see it.
http://forumarchedemarie.forumperso.com/t2775-liste-de-faussaires-de-dieu
There are ample private revelations from fully approved sources that give a clear indication of what we can expect in the near future without chasing after ones that have never received any approbation from the Church. I personally would only give credence to the approved ones.
Yeah, non-approved doesn't necessarily mean illegitimate. There's almost nothing related to the faith in his predictions, so it's not like someone could somehow get bad doctrine from reading his predictions. He was not silenced by the Church either. But the Church is very cautious about giving approbation to anything, and especially when the prophecies / visions / locutions have little or no bearing on the faith. It would be quite another thing if there was any theological content in the messages. Given that there isn't, the Church probably saw no value in even investigating.
Seems to work well for finding water, not so much heretics.
There's nothing superstitious involved. Water creates a magnetic field underground. It's absurd to consider it a sin to use them for the location of wells, which Alois Irlmaier did, and people still do to this day with great success.
Here's a Brit tutorial on dowsing for water.
Water dowsing (https://youtu.be/042N05bmlL4)
In the intro, he states the first recorded use of dowsing rods was by Queen Elizabeth I, in preparing for battle against Catholic Spain. England needed to find copper & silver mines so they commissioned German dowsers to find them and they did.
But, there is a preternatural side to it that is scary. In this Cockney Brit tutorial, he speaks of creating an "association" between yourself and the divining rods to look for silver. It requires that one ask the rods a series of questions.
Dowsing for silver (https://youtu.be/bbwo0YCpV3E)
Note: Per above, little mention is ever made of the Queen's witch, John Dee and his curses used to overturn the Spanish Armada.
Interesting. Yeah, you never really hear about how witches/warlocks/etc. are used in war but they are.
Don't know the exact source, but a guy was telling me about some of these based on a video he watched so take the info with a grain of salt but apparently they were also used in the cινιℓ ωαr that lead to the souths defeat.
I do know he was using divining rods, which is a superstitious practice that the Church has condemned. (https://i.imgur.com/T2G7LIE.jpg)It appears I spoke too soon, and that I clearly do not know what I am talking about. I had read some conflicting things about some prelates condemning it's use. Forgive my ignorance.
It appears I spoke too soon, and that I clearly do not know what I am talking about. I had read some conflicting things about some prelates condemning it's use. Forgive my ignorance.
Don't be so hard on yourself. That's what this forum is for. I'm sure it's a condemnable practice if one attributes some kind of "superstition" to it, but there are more things under heaven and earth that are dreamt of in the philosophy of "modern science". There's probably some scientific explanation for how / why this works ... even if we don't know what that is yet. We see that all the time where, if modern science can't figure out how or why something happens, they dismiss it as fake or fraudulent or superstitious. I doubt that modern science understand 1% of our physical reality, and probably understand at least 50% wrong or incorrectly. They do that constantly in the medical field, where the deride some of the medical practices of past generations or past civilizations as stupid ... only to find out that they were onto something. Those old Farmers' Almanacs made better predictions about the weather (using whatever methods of prognostication they employed) than modern meteorologists. There's probably some simple farmer out there that can smell the air and thereby accurately predict the weather for days or weeks out, whereas I can't trust "AccuWeather" to be even close more than 2 days out.Yeah I think it's only condemnable too when it's used to contact "spirits" instead of for searching for water or minerals.
When you see a night illumined by an unknown light, know that this is the great sign given you by God that He is about to punish the world for its sins, by means of war, famine, and persecutions against the Church and of the Holy Father.
Everything calls peace. Shalom! Then it will occur — a new Middle East war suddenly flares up, big naval forces are facing hostility in the Mediterranean — the situation is strained. But the actual firing spark is set on fire in the Balkans: I see a ‘large one’ falling, a bloody dagger lies beside him –then impact is on impact. Two men kill a third high-ranked. They were paid by other people. One of the murderers is a small black man, the other a little bit taller, with bright-colored hair. I think it will be at the Balkans, but I cannot say it exactly. When the Golden City [Prague] is destroyed, it all begins ...
Finally, an (alleged) Irlmaier statement should be mentioned in this context, which was published in 2002 in Magazine-2000/No. 171 by Bernhard Bouvier (pseudonym), according to which the victim of assassination number three would be a US president. B. Bouvier quotes there the Irlmaier-witness „Gärtner“, who in turn is said to quote Irlmaier:
„The spheres of influence and areas of interest of the USA and Russia collide; There are already minor skirmishes; USA/Russia peace conference in Bucharest; The American president is αssαssιnαtҽd, whereupon the vice-president immediately declares war. …“ […]
Irritating only that another author (Leo DeGard „Armageddon“, 2003) also interviewed the witness Gärtner, but clear differences to the Bouvier version emerged. DeGard changed the location of the assassination from Bucharest to Budapest. Also, the conference in Budapest is said to have been convened „at short notice“ after Russian troops had already advanced to Belgrade (!) – and thus already violated NATO territory. Then DeGard states:
The witness […] today thinks that the ‚high-ranking person‘ is a youthful-looking American president.
I found this elsewhere about Irlmaier ...
So, according to this version, there's a peace conference with USA/Russia in Bucharest or Budapest, convened on short notice.
We've recently had NATO quietly pushing Zelensky to strike a deal with Russia, and Zelensky just the other day was inviting Trump to come work a peace deal (though he said he would explain to Trump why it's not possible).
LOL ... I think that a "youthful-looking American president" would definitively rule out Biden. This one seems a bit sketchy overall but I figured it's worth throwing out there.
I don't know if you're on twitter at all @Ladislaus, but this gentleman is a good Catholic https://twitter.com/AloisIrlmaier and he posts a lot of prophecies, and often digs up some I've never heard of. Worth checking out his post/reply history.
This red light in the skies looked like aurora borealis, and has been seen in Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, even in Italy. It also reminded me on that light in the sky in 1938. It could be sign that this conflict in Middle East will become WWIII. There were many prophecies about WWIII, not just from Irlmaier. I think stigmytic Marie Julie Jahenny also predicted that during WWIII there will be 3 days of darkness. And 37 days before that in Brittany there will be 2 days of darkness, as a warning for coming of 3 days of darkness. Maybe some of that is in the hidden part of the third secret of Fatima. It must be terrible, Our Lady indicated annihilation of whole nations.
So, according to this version, there's a peace conference with USA/Russia in Bucharest or Budapest, convened on short notice.
I found this elsewhere about Irlmaier ...So could Trump be killed in Prague (and maybe even Putin too?), then Vance declares war? This would mean that Russia had already taken over most of Ukraine, since the prophecy said they were close to Prague, right?
So, according to this version, there's a peace conference with USA/Russia in Bucharest or Budapest, convened on short notice.
We've recently had NATO quietly pushing Zelensky to strike a deal with Russia, and Zelensky just the other day was inviting Trump to come work a peace deal (though he said he would explain to Trump why it's not possible).
LOL ... I think that a "youthful-looking American president" would definitively rule out Biden. This one seems a bit sketchy overall but I figured it's worth throwing out there.
Coming soon...
Finally, an (alleged) Irlmaier statement should be mentioned in this context, which was published in 2002 in Magazine-2000/No. 171 by Bernhard Bouvier (pseudonym), according to which the victim of assassination number three would be a US president. B. Bouvier quotes there the Irlmaier-witness „Gärtner“, who in turn is said to quote Irlmaier:
„The spheres of influence and areas of interest of the USA and Russia collide; There are already minor skirmishes; USA/Russia peace conference in Bucharest; The American president is αssαssιnαtҽd, whereupon the vice-president immediately declares war. …“ […]
Irritating only that another author (Leo DeGard „Armageddon“, 2003) also interviewed the witness Gärtner, but clear differences to the Bouvier version emerged. DeGard changed the location of the assassination from Bucharest to Budapest. Also, the conference in Budapest is said to have been convened „at short notice“ after Russian troops had already advanced to Belgrade (!) – and thus already violated NATO territory. Then DeGard states:
The witness […] today thinks that the ‚high-ranking person‘ is a youthful-looking American president.
Wow. So this is where Trump gets killed, just like the Simpsons predicted.I have a weird gut feeling of a fake psy op assassination on Trumpberg
I have a weird gut feeling of a fake psy op assassination on TrumpbergYes, it would be a psychological gut-punch to the maga-mob. Then Dems would "suddenly" have momentum for the mid terms. Then there would probably be melodrama between Vance and Trumps cabinet. TV ratings would be sky-high. The soap opera continues...
I have a weird gut feeling of a fake psy op assassination on Trumpberg
Yeah, they could fake the assassination just like for Kirk, and Trump's first fake assassination in Butler PA. Irlmaier wouldn't necessarily be privy to that as he appears to have just "seen" things, just like he saw people speaking into colorful cigarette boxes (aka smart cell phones).Budapest Is The Wrong Place For Trump To Meet Putin Regarding Ukraine
Short Notice Meeting in Budapest after "Peace Shalom!" (Trump's "eternal" peace deal for Israel) ...
If there's anything at all to it, this might be it.
Budapest Is The Wrong Place For Trump To Meet Putin Regarding UkraineThat article gives every reason in the world to knock off both putin/trump. :laugh1:
:laugh1:
(https://www.forbes.com/sites/andyjsemotiuk/2025/10/19/budapest-is-the-wrong-place-for-trump-to-meet-putin-regarding-ukraine/)I mean.....
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/alois-irlmaier-stephan-berndt/1148206717
This book comes out next year.
That article gives every reason in the world to knock off both putin/trump. :laugh1:
That article gives every reason in the world to knock off both putin/trump. :laugh1:And to knock off Orban for being a threat to democracy.
And to knock off Orban for being a threat to democracy.
Coming soon...
I found this elsewhere about Irlmaier ...
So, according to this version, there's a peace conference with USA/Russia in Bucharest or Budapest, convened on short notice.
We've recently had NATO quietly pushing Zelensky to strike a deal with Russia, and Zelensky just the other day was inviting Trump to come work a peace deal (though he said he would explain to Trump why it's not possible).
LOL ... I think that a "youthful-looking American president" would definitively rule out Biden. This one seems a bit sketchy overall but I figured it's worth throwing out there.
Yeah, thanks for recalling this and bumping it. Very interesting.
Pray the Rosary; it is the supreme tool/weapon for these trying times.