Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: UPDATE! Bishop Williamson on the Motu Proprio  (Read 5824 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
UPDATE! Bishop Williamson on the Motu Proprio
« Reply #10 on: November 27, 2006, 07:50:23 PM »
Dawn,

I pray the Bishop soon becomes sedevacantist, ending this double mindedness that is killing (or at least seriously enervating) the resistance to the enemy.  

Bp. Williamson wrote:
"Archbishop (Lefebvre) said, 'we are dealing with people who do not believe in absolute truth. People who do not believe in absolute truth cannot be Catholic.' So, there is no way a Catholic can come to an understand(ing) with a Hegelian.... . ....What is necessary is for the Catholics to understand who modernists are. Modernism is a very subtle and a very dangerous heresy..."

All people who do not believe in absolute truth cannot be Catholic.

Hegelians do not believe in absolute truth.

Hegelians cannot be Catholic.

Benedict XVI is an Hegelian.

Benedict XVI cannot be Catholic.

A non-Catholic cannot be Pope.

Benedict XVI is a non-Catholic Hegelian and cannot be Pope.

Question: Why does the SSPX waste precious time and energy "negotiating" with hegelians, if there is "no way" they can come to an understanding?  

Modernism is, in the words of St. Pius X, "the synthesis of all heresies" and all modernists are (the worst of all possible) heretics.

Benedict is an hegelian and a modernist.

Benedict IS an heretic.

UPDATE! Bishop Williamson on the Motu Proprio
« Reply #11 on: November 27, 2006, 09:23:20 PM »
From what I understand past Popes have been heretics.


Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
UPDATE! Bishop Williamson on the Motu Proprio
« Reply #12 on: November 28, 2006, 05:15:06 PM »
Quote from: CampeadorShin
From what I understand past Popes have been heretics.


This is commonly thrown about these days, but it is untrue.

UPDATE! Bishop Williamson on the Motu Proprio
« Reply #13 on: November 28, 2006, 07:33:19 PM »
Quote from: gladius_veritatis
Quote from: CampeadorShin
From what I understand past Popes have been heretics.


This is commonly thrown about these days, but it is untrue.


What about the term material heretic? Have there not been many of those in the past as well as formal heretics?

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
UPDATE! Bishop Williamson on the Motu Proprio
« Reply #14 on: November 28, 2006, 07:39:38 PM »
Quote from: Kephapaulos
What about the term material heretic? Have there not been many of those in the past as well as formal heretics?


Present your evidence of either one, Kepha.  

Can a formal (public) heretic be the head of the society of which he is no longer a member?  No, he cannot.