He "‘continues to improve’ with prognosis still secret, Vatican reports". That statement is contradictory. Isn't judging that he "continues to improve" itself a prognosis? It's a prediction (prognosis) that his health in the future will be better than it is now.

It's impossible to tell, with way too much obfuscation, to the point that most people have just given up trying to follow it.  He was in critical condition but then "working".

Is h even still alive?

Is h even still alive?

Nobody even knows.  There's been no "proof of life", e.g. a little video of him saying something or giving a thumbs up (while holding today's L'Osservatore Romano).  I suspect he may have already died on February 22, since a few days later there was a big article about how a close friend of his was barred from seeing him at the hospital.

There's absurdly contradictory info coming out, like "he's got 72 hours" vs. "he's improving" vs. "he's still critical ... but still somehow working".

We are not alone in reaching this conclusion:

Only problem there is that the Epstein doc release has thus far been a fraud and just a circus for show, as the stuff they released was heavily "redacted" and, as even Roger Stone admitted, "there's nothing new in the released docs that wasn't already in my 2015 book".  They made this circus of those morons holding copies of the "Epstein files" and grinning like morons as if cнιℓd тrαffιcking by our government officials who are being blackmail-compromised by their involvement is some laughing matter.

After the initial delays that people complained about on X, I consistently responded ...

"Patience please.  It's taking them longer than expected to expunge the myriad references to the fact that the Epstein ring was nothing more than an espionage / blackmail operation perpetrated against us by the Mossad, on behalf of our 'greatest ally'.  They had to put in more orders to Staples for black sharpies to blot stuff out."

Nobody even knows.  There's been no "proof of life", e.g. a little video of him saying something or giving a thumbs up (while holding today's L'Osservatore Romano).  I suspect he may have already died on February 22, since a few days later there was a big article about how a close friend of his was barred from seeing him at the hospital.

There's absurdly contradictory info coming out, like "he's got 72 hours" vs. "he's improving" vs. "he's still critical ... but still somehow working".

.

I don't understand this theory. What would be the motive for them to pretend he is still alive if he is dead?

Guys two things to me absolutely stinks in all of this. MILD kidney failure. Kidney failure is serious it’s NEVER mild. All kidney failure can kill you.
To say that He was doing work whilst having double pneumonia is bull, sorry. My Mother died with it and was too weak to talk never mind reading a paper. He would be completely incapacitated. It just doesn’t add up.

To say that He was doing work

.




Whoa, watch your caps there, buddy. 

The motive they have is in tune with their "timing" I would believe. If they are not ready to roll out a new puppet/fαℓѕє fℓαg they will manipulate the truth into their own narrative. They do it every day.

.

I have to imagine they have already figured out who is going to be next. Bergoglio has been in for years and is in his late 80s already. To say that those people need time to figure out what to do if Bergoglio dies seems unlikely to me.