Yeti: I only this morning found out the name of the apparition and the seer. When I originally heard about this around a month ago it was difficult to understand the man talking about it. And I almost didn't even look further into it for the exact things you mentioned but the story stuck with me because of who it was that said it and so I kept looking.
Ladislaus: I am amazed by the things I've read about it so far. The link I posted had way more in it than what I first was told about it. Or maybe he did say that, again I couldn't understand a lot of what was said. Lol. The story of her re: the protestants was the main point of why this man talked about it. I still haven't found anything corroborating that yet. Although I did find a link that appears to be definitive and at the least broad in scope about this apparition.
https://benoiterencurel.wordpress.com/benoite-rencurel-wiki-lahuile/And thank you for chiming in on it. For all the same reasons you said above are why I think its legitimate too and thought it worthwhile to share and field thoughts on it… I felt vindicated by your responses. Thanks, man.
Twicedyed: you are most welcome. Thank you for the link and response. I'm glad you find it interesting as well. The link I just added above has a lot of information on this apparition.
And she was declared a Servant of God by Pope Pius IX and Pope Leo XIII elevated the sanctuary to a minor basilica.
Gray2023: it is most definitely good to think about things in that way. I appreciate the response. Human respect can be hard to spurn at times. But if God is on our side, whom shall we fear? 😉
This apparition is very fascinating. A lot of intriguing things to look into…
Lastly, I remember from a long time ago on another thread far away buried in the threads of cathinfo Ladislaus said that V2 popes sometimes accidentally get some canonizations right… correct me if I just botched what you said. I have to agree with that sentiment re: canonizing Saints and approving apparitions. Not to say we just run with it. But Padre Pio is the example I think of re: this. And I think that very well can be said about approving this apparition. I don't put much stock into anything approved or promoted by modernists either but im glad I kept looking into this.
I do have to wonder about this from another side though too:
How often do they approve apparitions or canonize “Saints” like Faustina of the Divine Mercy deception, in order to discredit similar but legitimate ones and conversely put weight behind similar but false ones?
Because one of the first things that made me almost stop researching Our Lady of Laus is that the visions lasted 54 years. It reminded me immediately of the Medjugorie Hoax.
This is a wild and crazy time to be a Catholic. 😤
Our Lady bless all of you.