CathInfo.com

E rev around S

Cassini is a LIAR as I have posted numerous times that S is in motion,...

First of all let us see what Pope Paul V, as Prefect of the Holy Office and the only authority that could approve and order decrees of the Holy Office, put out in 1616 for all Catholics to obey:

(1) “That the sun is in the centre of the world and altogether immovable by local movement,” was unanimously declared to be “foolish, philosophically absurd, and formally heretical [denial of a revelation by God] inasmuch as it expressly contradicts the declarations of Holy Scripture in many passages, according to the proper meaning of the language used, and the sense in which they have been expounded and understood by [all] the Fathers and theologians.”
(2) “That the Earth is not the centre of the world, and moves as a whole, and also with a diurnal movement,” was unanimously declared “to deserve the same censure philosophically, and, theologically considered to be at least erroneous in faith.”

Now roscoe, your ‘E rev around S’ asserts the Earth revolves around the sun. This is ‘erroneous to the Catholic faith’ for starters, and by any definition the heresy as defined. 

Now what kind of movement of the sun was it heresy to deny?  The movement ‘as it expressly contradicts the declarations of Holy Scripture in many passages,’ So, let us see one of those passages:

“One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the Earth standeth forever. The sun riseth, and goeth down, and returneth to his place: and there rising again, maketh his round by the south, and turneth again to the north: the spirit goeth forward, surveying all places round about, and returneth to his circuits..” --- (Eccl. 1:4-7, 10).
           
So, here the Bible reveals the Sun revolves around the Earth, not roscoe’s E rev around a moving S.

So then, roscoe, when you tell readers of CIF that ‘Cassini is a liar as I have posted numerous times that S is in motion,’ what motion of the sun do you think will make me a liar and your quip not heresy? It certainly isn’t the sun’s rotation as that was known by all in 1616. So again roscoe, what movement of the sun renders you not guilty of the above quoted heresy with your constant ‘S rev around S?’

 

First of all let us see what Pope Paul V, as Prefect of the Holy Office and the only authority that could approve and order decrees of the Holy Office, put out in 1616 for all Catholics to obey:

(1) “That the sun is in the centre of the world and altogether immovable by local movement,” was unanimously declared to be “foolish, philosophically absurd, and formally heretical [denial of a revelation by God] inasmuch as it expressly contradicts the declarations of Holy Scripture in many passages, according to the proper meaning of the language used, and the sense in which they have been expounded and understood by [all] the Fathers and theologians.”
(2) “That the Earth is not the centre of the world, and moves as a whole, and also with a diurnal movement,” was unanimously declared “to deserve the same censure philosophically, and, theologically considered to be at least erroneous in faith.”

Now roscoe, your ‘E rev around S’ asserts the Earth revolves around the sun. This is ‘erroneous to the Catholic faith’ for starters, and by any definition the heresy as defined.

Now what kind of movement of the sun was it heresy to deny?  The movement ‘as it expressly contradicts the declarations of Holy Scripture in many passages,’ So, let us see one of those passages:

“One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the Earth standeth forever. The sun riseth, and goeth down, and returneth to his place: and there rising again, maketh his round by the south, and turneth again to the north: the spirit goeth forward, surveying all places round about, and returneth to his circuits..” --- (Eccl. 1:4-7, 10).
           
So, here the Bible reveals the Sun revolves around the Earth, not roscoe’s E rev around a moving S.

So then, roscoe, when you tell readers of CIF that ‘Cassini is a liar as I have posted numerous times that S is in motion,’ what motion of the sun do you think will make me a liar and your quip not heresy? It certainly isn’t the sun’s rotation as that was known by all in 1616. So again roscoe, what movement of the sun renders you not guilty of the above quoted heresy with your constant ‘S rev around S?’

roscoe is confirmed a heretic 

Here is an analysis of the the Church's teaching on the subject throughout history, and what is considered heretical. https://schismatic-home-aloner.com/geocentrism-heliocentrism-galileo/  I found it a good read, but lengthy with the extra BOD stuff added in.