Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response  (Read 32686 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Meg

Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
« Reply #120 on: September 24, 2017, 10:55:18 AM »
Just look at that!  Before I even had time to go and read my own post... thumbs down! Incredible!

;D

Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
« Reply #121 on: September 24, 2017, 10:56:27 AM »
Yes, I am the one using the thumbs down option. It's good that the forum allows it. I'm often being thumbed down in return, but that's okay. I expect that.
That's fine... it's the constant thumbing down without substantive refutation that annoys me... 


Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
« Reply #122 on: September 24, 2017, 10:56:55 AM »
That's hilarious... NOT!

How the culturally debased adopted this "yo momma so fat..." with pride, as a signature of their lowly state of being...

Now it's far worse because it's manifesting itself intellectually within the ranks of the "Remnant."
Have you noticed that they are using the thumbs down option more and more as their weapon of choice to respond?
While I suspect this to be the case, I can't truly say that I know it; it's the nature of this, minimal to nil accountability, "environment" of anonymity.

The thumbs thing is largely useless, this end at least; it's like voting for the prom queen - an extension of high school.

That said, it renders it of null effect for a thinking person, otherwise it can be like a feeder bar for a chimp that pushes the "correct" combination of buttons.

Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
« Reply #123 on: September 24, 2017, 10:57:53 AM »
That's fine... it's the constant thumbing down without substantive refutation that annoys me...
Right, .*. "... useless... "

Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
« Reply #124 on: September 24, 2017, 12:27:26 PM »
Ad hominem attacks? How so?

If you seriously see it this way, then you're attached to your opinions emotionally rather than intellectually...

You are demanding one of a superior intellect (Neil in this case) to debase himself to a lower standard of learning and reasoning. His opinions are formed by the skills of critical thinking. He judges the merit of something based on the proper use of reason, study and experience.

You on the other hand, have adopted another's opinion strictly by the use of the external senses, reason out the window. The modern motion pictures tend to bypass the faculties of the mind. It, by it's very nature, tends to enforce it's objective on one's will... very dangerous to those without prior objective convictions. I'm not saying that boobtube is always a bad thing, but it IS very dangerous to use as a primary source to form an objective opinion on an important matter.

To sum it up, when a young child enters his first years of elementary training, he is taught by those things which are of a visual nature. As he becomes more mature, those things which are of the visual become less and less... they become more of an aid rather than a necessary tool.
Ad hominem attacks? You just called me stupid without providing a shred refutation for the videos on the non curvature of the earth?
How can you claim to be serious?
Technology is a an indifferent medium. If you are Catholic you know that. You yourself are posting on a web forum!
Complaining about the fact that the proofs are in videos is ridiculous because the proofs are visual. You can't do most experiments  by just writing about them. They have to be observed.
So please, just go back to bed if you don't want to engage in serious discussion.