Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response  (Read 32578 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
« Reply #110 on: September 23, 2017, 07:31:18 PM »

Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
« Reply #111 on: September 23, 2017, 07:34:09 PM »
.
Oh, look! Three more nonsense videos! But no answer to the questions. Surprise, surprise! ..... NOT!
.


Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
« Reply #112 on: September 24, 2017, 08:24:21 AM »
.
Oh, look! Three more nonsense videos! But no answer to the questions. Surprise, surprise! ..... NOT!
.
And more videos for you to ignore so you can make more ad hominem attacks!
BTW how much are you getting paid for these posts? Do you get a commision for the number of posts? Or standard hourly rate?
Do you even get performance reviews by your employers?

Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
« Reply #113 on: September 24, 2017, 10:14:06 AM »
And more videos for you to ignore so you can make more ad hominem attacks!
Ad hominem attacks? How so?

If you seriously see it this way, then you're attached to your opinions emotionally rather than intellectually...

You are demanding one of a superior intellect (Neil in this case) to debase himself to a lower standard of learning and reasoning. His opinions are formed by the skills of critical thinking. He judges the merit of something based on the proper use of reason, study and experience.

You on the other hand, have adopted another's opinion strictly by the use of the external senses, reason out the window. The modern motion pictures tend to bypass the faculties of the mind. It, by it's very nature, tends to enforce it's objective on one's will... very dangerous to those without prior objective convictions. I'm not saying that boobtube is always a bad thing, but it IS very dangerous to use as a primary source to form an objective opinion on an important matter.

To sum it up, when a young child enters his first years of elementary training, he is taught by those things which are of a visual nature. As he becomes more mature, those things which are of the visual become less and less... they become more of an aid rather than a necessary tool.

Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
« Reply #114 on: September 24, 2017, 10:24:05 AM »
Ad hominem attacks? How so?

If you seriously see it this way, then you're attached to your opinions emotionally rather than intellectually...

You are demanding one of a superior intellect (Neil in this case) to debase himself to a lower standard of learning and reasoning. His opinions are formed by the skills of critical thinking. He judges the merit of something based on the proper use of reason, study and experience.

You on the other hand, have adopted another's opinion strictly by the use of the external senses, reason out the window. The modern motion pictures tend to bypass the faculties of the mind. It, by it's very nature, tends to enforce it's objective on one's will... very dangerous to those without prior objective convictions. I'm not saying that boobtube is always a bad thing, but it IS very dangerous to use as a primary source to form an objective opinion on an important matter.

To sum it up, when a young child enters his first years of elementary training, he is taught by those things which are of a visual nature. As he becomes more mature, those things which are of the visual become less and less... they become more of an aid rather than a necessary tool.
Isn't it telling that "we've" fallen into thinking that a perpetual bout of "the dozens" = debate or rational discourse, as is indicated by, e.g., one crying "ad hominem!" in response to the equivalent of "yo momma so fat..."?