Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: % Confidence in Earth's Shape  (Read 89614 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: % Confidence in Earth's Shape
« Reply #85 on: August 05, 2022, 04:48:45 PM »
You're the one sticking your head in the sand.  Mr. Dave's videos are sheer nonsense.  But it figures coming from someone who chose a pagan sun god as his forum name.  You've already decided that the earth can't be flat, refuse to objectively consider the evidence, and apply confirmation bias to that which you believe supports your position.  I've objectively looked at both sides, but I find absolutely none of Mr. Dave's "proofs" to be the least bit convincing.
.
Is that your proof?  Very logical.  

Ad hominem attacks.  "sheer nonsense".  More ad hominem attacks.
And the most important proof:  "I find none of Mr Dave's proofs to be convincing".

Wow.  It's hard to argue against that.  I didn't think you would.  You have proved
that numerous times in the past with your ad hominem attacks.  

Apollo was a hermit in the BC era.  Look it up.  But then your ad hominem attack
will be nullified.

I wonder if you can figure out why I only visit CathInfo about once or twice a year.  
Looks like no progress has been made since one year ago.  

I repeat my proposal, that you look at this video (this is the first one of ten).
I wonder if you can even understand the first one.  



Offline Emile

  • Supporter
Re: % Confidence in Earth's Shape
« Reply #86 on: August 05, 2022, 05:19:16 PM »
.
Is that your proof?  Very logical. 

Ad hominem attacks.  "sheer nonsense".  More ad hominem attacks.
And the most important proof:  "I find none of Mr Dave's proofs to be convincing".

Wow.  It's hard to argue against that.  I didn't think you would.  You have proved
that numerous times in the past with your ad hominem attacks. 

Apollo was a hermit in the BC era.  Look it up.  But then your ad hominem attack
will be nullified.

I wonder if you can figure out why I only visit CathInfo about once or twice a year. 
Looks like no progress has been made since one year ago. 

I repeat my proposal, that you look at this video (this is the first one of ten).
I wonder if you can even understand the first one. 



Not to intrude between you and Lad, but the video that you posted has been rebutted before:

https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/geo-centrism-conference/msg743955/#msg743955



Re: % Confidence in Earth's Shape
« Reply #87 on: August 05, 2022, 06:05:13 PM »
Not to intrude between you and Lad, but the video that you posted has been rebutted before:
.
That was not a refutation at that time and is not a refutation now.
I'm going to take a few months or years away from CathInfo. 

Good luck finding the "gravity of the universe" and measuring it.


Re: % Confidence in Earth's Shape
« Reply #88 on: August 05, 2022, 06:48:47 PM »
.
Is that your proof?  Very logical. 

Ad hominem attacks.  "sheer nonsense".  More ad hominem attacks.
And the most important proof:  "I find none of Mr Dave's proofs to be convincing".

Wow.  It's hard to argue against that.  I didn't think you would.  You have proved
that numerous times in the past with your ad hominem attacks. 

Apollo was a hermit in the BC era.  Look it up.  But then your ad hominem attack
will be nullified.

I wonder if you can figure out why I only visit CathInfo about once or twice a year. 
Looks like no progress has been made since one year ago. 

I repeat my proposal, that you look at this video (this is the first one of ten).
I wonder if you can even understand the first one. 


This is sort of a brief abstract discovered at Texas A & M. "Gravity" is not a lateral force. "Gravity" does not move anything sideways. However, the Moon goes laterally around the Earth. Therefore, it cannot be "gravity" that moves the Moon around the Earth.

The end of "gravity" is also the end of heliocentrism. Without Newtonian "gravity" as a force, heliocentrism will fail in further demonstrative proofs, etc.

Re: % Confidence in Earth's Shape
« Reply #89 on: August 05, 2022, 07:18:23 PM »
This is sort of a brief abstract discovered at Texas A & M. "Gravity" is not a lateral force. "Gravity" does not move anything sideways. However, the Moon goes laterally around the Earth. Therefore, it cannot be "gravity" that moves the Moon around the Earth.

The end of "gravity" is also the end of heliocentrism. Without Newtonian "gravity" as a force, heliocentrism will fail in further demonstrative proofs, etc.
Electromagnetic or electrostatic forces are a much more likely explanation for the behavior of the sun and moon's circling the earth. It even works in favor of a spherical earth as it gives a more practical means of how objects remain affixed to the spheroid globe.