[moneil]

There is a massive genetic gap between races. Mixing has a huge risk of health problems.) 

You know in the genetics of animals.  Pure breeds have more health issues than mutts, so I am not sure your science is correct.

The "science" in the first quote (from Reply #10) is WAY off.  That person may want to study the works of Gregor Mendel, OSA, 1822 - 1844.  He became abbot of St. Thomas Abbey in Brno in the Czech Republic.  He also conducted plant breeding experiments in the abbey's gardens and is considered the father of modern genetics.  He demonstrated that hybrid vigor, or heterosis, occurs when the offspring of two different parent plants have superior traits compared to the parents.

In the dairy and beef cattle production, where I worked for nearly 50 years, the importance of outcrossing and necessity to avoid inbreeding is well known.

[soft pillow]

The "science" in the first quote (from Reply #10) is WAY off.  That person may want to study the works of Gregor Mendel, OSA, 1822 - 1844.  He became abbot of St. Thomas Abbey in Brno in the Czech Republic.  He also conducted plant breeding experiments in the abbey's gardens and is considered the father of modern genetics.  He demonstrated that hybrid vigor, or heterosis, occurs when the offspring of two different parent plants have superior traits compared to the parents.

In the dairy and beef cattle production, where I worked for nearly 50 years, the importance of outcrossing and necessity to avoid inbreeding is well known.

 You can still avoid interbreeding while sticking to your own breed (and race). 

[Miseremini]

You know in the genetics of animals.  Pure breeds have more health issues than mutts, so I am not sure your science is correct.

But you forget that pure bred animals are sold for...$$$$$$$$$$.
In 80 years I've bought many pure bred dogs and can honestly say EVERY BREEDER turned out to be a liar.  You can't trust the paperwork.
I bought one nine month old female who turned out to be pregnant.  It could have been by her father or her brother but the breeder made up some cock and bull story about the pup went for a weekend visit to her mother's who happened to have an uncut pure bred male.  Yeah right. The only pup didn't survive.
I don't think it's fair to compare an animal sold for $$$ to people.  There are laws, both civil and church, against people marrying too close in relation

[AnthonyPadua]

You know in the genetics of animals.  Pure breeds have more health issues than mutts, so I am not sure your science is correct.

You are confusing inbreeding. "outbreeding" is also a severe risk. Good breeding is from a similar genetic line that is neither too close nor too far. Euros with other euros are close enough. Non euros are far apart from euros.

[AnthonyPadua]

The "science" in the first quote (from Reply #10) is WAY off.  That person may want to study the works of Gregor Mendel, OSA, 1822 - 1844.  He became abbot of St. Thomas Abbey in Brno in the Czech Republic.  He also conducted plant breeding experiments in the abbey's gardens and is considered the father of modern genetics.  He demonstrated that hybrid vigor, or heterosis, occurs when the offspring of two different parent plants have superior traits compared to the parents.

In the dairy and beef cattle production, where I worked for nearly 50 years, the importance of outcrossing and necessity to avoid inbreeding is well known.

I'm not sure what science you are referring to but outbreeding is just as much as a problem as inbreeding. You need a good genetics distance. Neither too far nor too close. The Pope has privately taught that we can stay as our own race.

See my attachments.

[moneil]

You can still avoid interbreeding while sticking to your own breed (and race).

I'm thinking you meant "inbreeding", not "interbreeding".  Interbreeding means to reproduce with members of another breed or group.

I never said that one cannot avoid inbreeding while breeding within one's own breed or race, but it can be an issue if people consistently mate with genetic relatives, such as the royal houses of Europe.  On the other hand, the quoted poster from reply #10 said that "Mixing has a huge risk of health problems", and that is completely false.  It is well demonstrated in both the plant and animal kingdoms that combining unrelated genetic material introduces hybrid vigor and avoids the duplication of undesirable traits.  And yes, this would be true if two English persons with no or VERY distant genetic connections mated.  The chances of it being true would be even more likely if a Swede mated with an Italian, or a Frenchman with a Slav.

[IndultCat]

And why is separation so important, now?

Even though I and my husband are mostly English by genetics, our culture was living in very mixed environments in California in the 90s, so I am not even sure what my white culture would be.  I am much more comfortable with Asians.  I don't understand the English, or Germans, or Irish.  I would feel out of place in those cultures.  This kind of talk just makes me feel like I have no culture to belong to.

Most people are tired of being FORCED to live among different cultures in their OWN neighborhoods. If people like you want to associate with others from a different culture, fine, nobody is against that. What people hate is when the government FORCES others to live among (in the very same neighborhoods) those whom others do not want to live among. Very often, once that happens, the once safe and nice-looking neighborhoods suddenly turn into dangerous eyesores.

Again, this usually happens due to the government moving Section 8 Scuм into decent neighborhoods. That's why "White Flight" exists to those who are fortunate enough to be able to afford to move away from the Section 8 Scuм cesspools forced into formerly decent and safe neighborhoods thanks to a rotten government.

And just as it is bad for humans to breed too close to their kind(incest) it's also bad for humans to breed too far away from their kind (miscegenation). Just look at how troublesome it can be for the relationships of couples who are of the same race but are in "mixed marriages" (i.e. a Catholic married to a Protestant). Well, couples from different cultures and races who are married to one another have MUCH MORE troublesome relationships because the FAMILIES are very very different.

Those who marry interracially and have interracial kids are very selfish because they are ONLY thinking of themselves. Can 2 people from different races and cultures love each other? Sure. Should they marry and join their families together and have kids? Hell no. It only screws up the kids' identities and makes the getting along with opposing families much more difficult, sometimes even impossible.

Those who commit interracial marriage never look at the whole picture and their kids and families suffer because of it.

[AnthonyPadua]

I'm thinking you meant "inbreeding", not "interbreeding".  Interbreeding means to reproduce with members of another breed or group.

I never said that one cannot avoid inbreeding while breeding within one's own breed or race, but it can be an issue if people consistently mate with genetic relatives, such as the royal houses of Europe.  On the other hand, the quoted poster from reply #10 said that "Mixing has a huge risk of health problems", and that is completely false.  It is well demonstrated in both the plant and animal kingdoms that combining unrelated genetic material introduces hybrid vigor and avoids the duplication of undesirable traits.  And yes, this would be true if two English persons with no or VERY distant genetic connections mated.  The chances of it being true would be even more likely if a Swede mated with an Italian, or a Frenchman with a Slav.

"Hybrid vigor" is a propaganda term to promote miscegenation.

[Gray2023]

Most people are tired of being FORCED to live among different cultures in their OWN neighborhoods. If people like you want to associate with others from a different culture, fine, nobody is against that. What people hate is when the government FORCES others to live among (in the very same neighborhoods) those whom others do not want to live among. Very often, once that happens, the once safe and nice-looking neighborhoods suddenly turn into dangerous eyesores.

Again, this usually happens due to the government moving Section 8 Scuм into decent neighborhoods. That's why "White Flight" exists to those who are fortunate enough to be able to afford to move away from the Section 8 Scuм cesspools forced into formerly decent and safe neighborhoods thanks to a rotten government.

And just as it is bad for humans to breed too close to their kind(incest) it's also bad for humans to breed too far away from their kind (miscegenation). Just look at how troublesome it can be for the relationships of couples who are of the same race but are in "mixed marriages" (i.e. a Catholic married to a Protestant). Well, couples from different cultures and races who are married to one another have MUCH MORE troublesome relationships because the FAMILIES are very very different.

Those who marry interracially and have interracial kids are very selfish because they are ONLY thinking of themselves. Can 2 people from different races and cultures love each other? Sure. Should they marry and join their families together and have kids? Hell no. It only screws up the kids' identities and makes the getting along with opposing families much more difficult, sometimes even impossible.

Those who commit interracial marriage never look at the whole picture and their kids and families suffer because of it.

Can you explain where you are getting this information?  Most of the neighborhoods that I grew up in were mixed racially, so I never had the experience of a homogeneous (is that the right term?) society. 

I can understand if someone grew up with a single race, they would probably want to keep it that way, but no two people have the exact same experiences and does it do anyone well to force them into something they are uncomfortable with?  The problem is more complicated then mixing of races.  Two people who grow up in the same neighborhood have similar experiences.  Does it really matter what there race is?

You mentioned the government manipulating neighborhoods.  I do think that is wrong and the government should stay out of it, but how do we change that?  How do we get the government to stop using people as pawns to force an ungodly society?

[Aleksandar]

What's your obsession with White only? Why do you and the crypto-jews, here, come rushing out and tripping over yourselves with bagel crumbs on you chins to attack White onlyism? Boomer. 

Here he goes again with the crypto-jew accusations, and a Nick Fuentes profile picture, really? Caxap reincarnated strikes again.
How many times am I going to have to explain to you the hypocrisy of calling someone a crypto Jew while supporting Nick Fuentes? And you were just promoting Brother Nathanael, a racial Jew.

You obviously don't want to see the truth, you're just here to promote false leaders and stir distrust, this is fed behaviour.

[Aleksandar]

"Hybrid vigor" is a propaganda term to promote miscegenation.

Correct.

[Everlast22]

It's important to realize. A grifter like Fuentes doesn't' really have skin in the game of what the Jews necessarily want (in my opinion), but:

Money and Power are a HUGE temptation to a young man. He gets in, he gets dug in, makes 20 - 25 k a month as a 21 year old, and I guarantee you, he won't bite the hand that feeds him. 

It's either THAT, or he's a well-paid agent. Either way, we have the intuition to know he's no good. 

Don't underestimate the power of hush-money in this day and age, it's so incredibly powerful.

[WorldsAway]

I can understand if someone grew up with a single race, they would probably want to keep it that way, but no two people have the exact same experiences and does it do anyone well to force them into something they are uncomfortable with?  The problem is more complicated then mixing of races.  Two people who grow up in the same neighborhood have similar experiences.  Does it really matter what there race is?

One simple reason is that most white people do not want to live where violent crime is prevalent. Blacks commit violent crime at insanely disproportionate rates compared to whites. This takes into consideration all black age groups, both genders, household income, whether they live in poverty or not, or any other "socio-economic" factors.
So, where a significant number of blacks are, violent crime is prevalent. Therefore, whites generally do not want to live around blacks

You mentioned the government manipulating neighborhoods. I do think that is wrong and the government should stay out of it, but how do we change that? How do we get the government to stop using people as pawns to force an ungodly society?

If you are looking for real, observable change you get it by creating intentionally white communities

[Gray2023]

So just abandon blacks to their violent behavior that has been instigated by the government in which they live under?  To me that seems like just a bandaid fix to a greater governmental problem.  My opinion is that bandaids don't usually solve the problem in the long run.

I mean it is not really about a race destroying communities.  It is about liberals  making bank on their poor policies and then leaving the communities they allowed to be destroyed by these poloicies to then do it again for their new community.  California is a great example of the rich people messing up the state and then going to other states  but it's not stopped because they have money.   Does it work the same way in Australia?

[WorldsAway]

So just abandon blacks to their violent behavior that has been instigated by the government in which they live under?  To me that seems like just a bandaid fix to a greater governmental problem.  My opinion is that bandaids don't usually solve the problem in the long run.

I mean it is not really about a race destroying communities. It is about liberals making bank on their poor policies and then leaving the communities they allowed to be destroyed by these poloicies to then do it again for their new community. California is a great example of the rich people messing up the state and then going to other states but it's not stopped because they have money. Does it work the same way in Australia?

You say "abandon" as if white people have some sort of obligation to take care of them. The same white people getting robbed, assaulted, raped, and murdered while the government steals their money to give to the people doing these things. The violent behavior is not instigated, it's exacerbated. Yes, it is about race. Stop excusing violent criminals