Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => The Catholic Bunker => Topic started by: soft pillow on August 01, 2025, 07:25:53 PM
-
https://rumble.com/v6wypy2-victory-arkansas-ag-finds-nothing-illegal-with-whites-only-community-aarvol.html?e9s=src_v1_cmd%2Csrc_v1_upp_a
-
This will be the first of many, he mentioned looking at starting one in Europe, although it will undoubtedly be much harder to get away with.
It's just a shame that he isn't a Catholic, I've heard he is a neo-platonist.
-
This will be the first of many, he mentioned looking at starting one in Europe, although it will undoubtedly be much harder to get away with.
It's just a shame that he isn't a Catholic, I've heard he is a neo-platonist.
Such a community would be shut down instantaneously within Euripe.
-
What’s the obsession with White only? You DO realize Archbishop LeFebvre was head of the Holy Ghost Fathers mission to Gabon? There are many fine Black Catholics, yes, even Saints!
-
What’s the obsession with White only? You DO realize Archbishop LeFebvre was head of the Holy Ghost Fathers mission to Gabon? There are many fine Black Catholics, yes, even Saints!
Because whites are being genocided in their own countries everywhere across the world. Look around.
-
What’s the obsession with White only? You DO realize Archbishop LeFebvre was head of the Holy Ghost Fathers mission to Gabon? There are many fine Black Catholics, yes, even Saints!
Emphasis on "to Gabon". The missionaries went to Gabon, not the Gabonese to Europe. We are not promoting the exclusion of blacks or other non whites from the Church. Not in the slightest. But they can have the Church and the faith in their own countries, with their own cultures, and with their own people
-
Because whites are being genocided in their own countries everywhere across the world. Look around.
Right. There has been and continues to be a process of eradicating and replacing a race of people that God willed to exist for thousands of years. This is out of racial and religious hatred. Yet when whites and white Catholics seek no more than to preserve their own people, the "colorblind" Catholics suddenly have a problem. Do they not have a problem with the Great Replacement? If they refuse to see its existence, they are blind fools. If they agree it does exist, then why do they take issue with white separatism? It is the means of resisting this evil that has been forced upon us
-
What’s the obsession with White only? You DO realize Archbishop LeFebvre was head of the Holy Ghost Fathers mission to Gabon? There are many fine Black Catholics, yes, even Saints!
LeFebvre went and spread the GOSPEL IN AFRICA.. Not the same as flooding non whites into your own European country and saying "we are all the same if we're Catholic". No.
Jeepers.
-
LeFebvre went and spread the GOSPEL IN AFRICA.. Not the same as flooding non whites into your own European country and saying "we are all the same if we're Catholic". No.Jeepers.
Exactly. There's a reason why God separated different peoples SO FAR AWAY from one another. Disparate cultures were never meant to mix together but, rather, were meant to exist separately. This "natural order" of separation brought peace and harmony to all individuals of each separate culture.
Unfortunately, it was man, in his lust, curiosity and greed, who deliberately manipulated the "natural order" of things. Now we are ALL paying the price for it.
-
Exactly. There's a reason why God separated different peoples SO FAR AWAY from one another. Disparate cultures were never meant to mix together but, rather, were meant to exist separately. This "natural order" of separation brought peace and harmony to all individuals of each separate culture.
Unfortunately, it was man, in his lust, curiosity and greed, who deliberately manipulated the "natural order" of things. Now we are ALL paying the price for it.
I just really do not understand this thought process. History has all people born of Adam and Eve. One race. Then the flood came and all people came from Moses and his family.
The cultures were then separated at the tower of babble. Correct?
And then what?
And why is separation so important, now?
Even though I and my husband are mostly English by genetics, our culture was living in very mixed environments in California in the 90s, so I am not even sure what my white culture would be. I am much more comfortable with Asians. I don't understand the English, or Germans, or Irish. I would feel out of place in those cultures. This kind of talk just makes me feel like I have no culture to belong to.
-
I just really do not understand this thought process. History has all people born of Adam and Eve. One race. Then the flood came and all people came from Moses and his family.
The cultures were then separated at the tower of babble. Correct?
And then what?
And why is separation so important, now?
Even though I and my husband are mostly English by genetics, our culture was living in very mixed environments in California in the 90s, so I am not even sure what my white culture would be. I am much more comfortable with Asians. I don't understand the English, or Germans, or Irish. I would feel out of place in those cultures. This kind of talk just makes me feel like I have no culture to belong to.
There is a massive genetic gap between races. Mixing has a huge risk of health problems.
-
I just really do not understand this thought process. History has all people born of Adam and Eve. One race. Then the flood came and all people came from Moses and his family.
The cultures were then separated at the tower of babble. Correct?
And then what?
And why is separation so important, now?
Even though I and my husband are mostly English by genetics, our culture was living in very mixed environments in California in the 90s, so I am not even sure what my white culture would be. I am much more comfortable with Asians. I don't understand the English, or Germans, or Irish. I would feel out of place in those cultures. This kind of talk just makes me feel like I have no culture to belong to.
I am several magnitudes closer to whites than anything in Hispanic culture, so I understand where you're coming from.
And "white culture" is a misnomer, anyway. Africans and Europeans are exactly the damn same in that their countries are a poorly stitched together mess of regions that somehow got put into one "white culture" or "African culture" when they couldn't be anywhere close to unified. That's why Europe has so many separatist movements. That's why when you put the Hutus and Tutsis in the same country, one called the other cockroaches and killed a million of them in 3 months. There is no such thing as "white culture".
The only European country that has a real unified singular "identity" is France, but that's because the government took a sledgehammer to any sort of regional anything and made everyone speak Standard French.
-
I just really do not understand this thought process. History has all people born of Adam and Eve. One race. Then the flood came and all people came from Moses and his family.
The cultures were then separated at the tower of babble. Correct?
And then what?
And why is separation so important, now?
Even though I and my husband are mostly English by genetics, our culture was living in very mixed environments in California in the 90s, so I am not even sure what my white culture would be. I am much more comfortable with Asians. I don't understand the English, or Germans, or Irish. I would feel out of place in those cultures. This kind of talk just makes me feel like I have no culture to belong to.
I meant Noah. Sorry.
-
There is a massive genetic gap between races. Mixing has a huge risk of health problems.
You know in the genetics of animals. Pure breeds have more health issues than mutts, so I am not sure your science is correct.
-
What’s the obsession with White only? You DO realize Archbishop LeFebvre was head of the Holy Ghost Fathers mission to Gabon? There are many fine Black Catholics, yes, even Saints!
What's your obsession with White only? Why do you and the crypto-jews, here, come rushing out and tripping over yourselves with bagel crumbs on you chins to attack White onlyism? Boomer.
-
There is a massive genetic gap between races. Mixing has a huge risk of health problems.)
You know in the genetics of animals. Pure breeds have more health issues than mutts, so I am not sure your science is correct.
The "science" in the first quote (from Reply #10) is WAY off. That person may want to study the works of Gregor Mendel, OSA, 1822 - 1844. He became abbot of St. Thomas Abbey in Brno in the Czech Republic. He also conducted plant breeding experiments in the abbey's gardens and is considered the father of modern genetics. He demonstrated that hybrid vigor, or heterosis, occurs when the offspring of two different parent plants have superior traits compared to the parents.
In the dairy and beef cattle production, where I worked for nearly 50 years, the importance of outcrossing and necessity to avoid inbreeding is well known.
-
The "science" in the first quote (from Reply #10) is WAY off. That person may want to study the works of Gregor Mendel, OSA, 1822 - 1844. He became abbot of St. Thomas Abbey in Brno in the Czech Republic. He also conducted plant breeding experiments in the abbey's gardens and is considered the father of modern genetics. He demonstrated that hybrid vigor, or heterosis, occurs when the offspring of two different parent plants have superior traits compared to the parents.
In the dairy and beef cattle production, where I worked for nearly 50 years, the importance of outcrossing and necessity to avoid inbreeding is well known.
:facepalm: You can still avoid interbreeding while sticking to your own breed (and race).
-
You know in the genetics of animals. Pure breeds have more health issues than mutts, so I am not sure your science is correct.
But you forget that pure bred animals are sold for...$$$$$$$$$$.
In 80 years I've bought many pure bred dogs and can honestly say EVERY BREEDER turned out to be a liar. You can't trust the paperwork.
I bought one nine month old female who turned out to be pregnant. It could have been by her father or her brother but the breeder made up some cock and bull story about the pup went for a weekend visit to her mother's who happened to have an uncut pure bred male. Yeah right. The only pup didn't survive.
I don't think it's fair to compare an animal sold for $$$ to people. There are laws, both civil and church, against people marrying too close in relation
-
You know in the genetics of animals. Pure breeds have more health issues than mutts, so I am not sure your science is correct.
You are confusing inbreeding. "outbreeding" is also a severe risk. Good breeding is from a similar genetic line that is neither too close nor too far. Euros with other euros are close enough. Non euros are far apart from euros.
-
The "science" in the first quote (from Reply #10) is WAY off. That person may want to study the works of Gregor Mendel, OSA, 1822 - 1844. He became abbot of St. Thomas Abbey in Brno in the Czech Republic. He also conducted plant breeding experiments in the abbey's gardens and is considered the father of modern genetics. He demonstrated that hybrid vigor, or heterosis, occurs when the offspring of two different parent plants have superior traits compared to the parents.
In the dairy and beef cattle production, where I worked for nearly 50 years, the importance of outcrossing and necessity to avoid inbreeding is well known.
I'm not sure what science you are referring to but outbreeding is just as much as a problem as inbreeding. You need a good genetics distance. Neither too far nor too close. The Pope has privately taught that we can stay as our own race.
See my attachments.
-
:facepalm: You can still avoid interbreeding while sticking to your own breed (and race).
I'm thinking you meant "inbreeding", not "interbreeding". Interbreeding means to reproduce with members of another breed or group.
I never said that one cannot avoid inbreeding while breeding within one's own breed or race, but it can be an issue if people consistently mate with genetic relatives, such as the royal houses of Europe. On the other hand, the quoted poster from reply #10 said that "Mixing has a huge risk of health problems", and that is completely false. It is well demonstrated in both the plant and animal kingdoms that combining unrelated genetic material introduces hybrid vigor and avoids the duplication of undesirable traits. And yes, this would be true if two English persons with no or VERY distant genetic connections mated. The chances of it being true would be even more likely if a Swede mated with an Italian, or a Frenchman with a Slav.
-
And why is separation so important, now?
Even though I and my husband are mostly English by genetics, our culture was living in very mixed environments in California in the 90s, so I am not even sure what my white culture would be. I am much more comfortable with Asians. I don't understand the English, or Germans, or Irish. I would feel out of place in those cultures. This kind of talk just makes me feel like I have no culture to belong to.
Most people are tired of being FORCED to live among different cultures in their OWN neighborhoods. If people like you want to associate with others from a different culture, fine, nobody is against that. What people hate is when the government FORCES others to live among (in the very same neighborhoods) those whom others do not want to live among. Very often, once that happens, the once safe and nice-looking neighborhoods suddenly turn into dangerous eyesores.
Again, this usually happens due to the government moving Section 8 Scuм into decent neighborhoods. That's why "White Flight" exists to those who are fortunate enough to be able to afford to move away from the Section 8 Scuм cesspools forced into formerly decent and safe neighborhoods thanks to a rotten government.
And just as it is bad for humans to breed too close to their kind(incest) it's also bad for humans to breed too far away from their kind (miscegenation). Just look at how troublesome it can be for the relationships of couples who are of the same race but are in "mixed marriages" (i.e. a Catholic married to a Protestant). Well, couples from different cultures and races who are married to one another have MUCH MORE troublesome relationships because the FAMILIES are very very different.
Those who marry interracially and have interracial kids are very selfish because they are ONLY thinking of themselves. Can 2 people from different races and cultures love each other? Sure. Should they marry and join their families together and have kids? Hell no. It only screws up the kids' identities and makes the getting along with opposing families much more difficult, sometimes even impossible.
Those who commit interracial marriage never look at the whole picture and their kids and families suffer because of it.
-
I'm thinking you meant "inbreeding", not "interbreeding". Interbreeding means to reproduce with members of another breed or group.
I never said that one cannot avoid inbreeding while breeding within one's own breed or race, but it can be an issue if people consistently mate with genetic relatives, such as the royal houses of Europe. On the other hand, the quoted poster from reply #10 said that "Mixing has a huge risk of health problems", and that is completely false. It is well demonstrated in both the plant and animal kingdoms that combining unrelated genetic material introduces hybrid vigor and avoids the duplication of undesirable traits. And yes, this would be true if two English persons with no or VERY distant genetic connections mated. The chances of it being true would be even more likely if a Swede mated with an Italian, or a Frenchman with a Slav.
"Hybrid vigor" is a propaganda term to promote miscegenation.
-
Most people are tired of being FORCED to live among different cultures in their OWN neighborhoods. If people like you want to associate with others from a different culture, fine, nobody is against that. What people hate is when the government FORCES others to live among (in the very same neighborhoods) those whom others do not want to live among. Very often, once that happens, the once safe and nice-looking neighborhoods suddenly turn into dangerous eyesores.
Again, this usually happens due to the government moving Section 8 Scuм into decent neighborhoods. That's why "White Flight" exists to those who are fortunate enough to be able to afford to move away from the Section 8 Scuм cesspools forced into formerly decent and safe neighborhoods thanks to a rotten government.
And just as it is bad for humans to breed too close to their kind(incest) it's also bad for humans to breed too far away from their kind (miscegenation). Just look at how troublesome it can be for the relationships of couples who are of the same race but are in "mixed marriages" (i.e. a Catholic married to a Protestant). Well, couples from different cultures and races who are married to one another have MUCH MORE troublesome relationships because the FAMILIES are very very different.
Those who marry interracially and have interracial kids are very selfish because they are ONLY thinking of themselves. Can 2 people from different races and cultures love each other? Sure. Should they marry and join their families together and have kids? Hell no. It only screws up the kids' identities and makes the getting along with opposing families much more difficult, sometimes even impossible.
Those who commit interracial marriage never look at the whole picture and their kids and families suffer because of it.
Can you explain where you are getting this information? Most of the neighborhoods that I grew up in were mixed racially, so I never had the experience of a homogeneous (is that the right term?) society.
I can understand if someone grew up with a single race, they would probably want to keep it that way, but no two people have the exact same experiences and does it do anyone well to force them into something they are uncomfortable with? The problem is more complicated then mixing of races. Two people who grow up in the same neighborhood have similar experiences. Does it really matter what there race is?
You mentioned the government manipulating neighborhoods. I do think that is wrong and the government should stay out of it, but how do we change that? How do we get the government to stop using people as pawns to force an ungodly society?
-
What's your obsession with White only? Why do you and the crypto-jews, here, come rushing out and tripping over yourselves with bagel crumbs on you chins to attack White onlyism? Boomer.
Here he goes again with the crypto-jew accusations, and a Nick Fuentes profile picture, really? Caxap reincarnated strikes again.
How many times am I going to have to explain to you the hypocrisy of calling someone a crypto Jew while supporting Nick Fuentes? And you were just promoting Brother Nathanael, a racial Jew.
You obviously don't want to see the truth, you're just here to promote false leaders and stir distrust, this is fed behaviour.
-
"Hybrid vigor" is a propaganda term to promote miscegenation.
Correct.
-
It's important to realize. A grifter like Fuentes doesn't' really have skin in the game of what the Jews necessarily want (in my opinion), but:
Money and Power are a HUGE temptation to a young man. He gets in, he gets dug in, makes 20 - 25 k a month as a 21 year old, and I guarantee you, he won't bite the hand that feeds him.
It's either THAT, or he's a well-paid agent. Either way, we have the intuition to know he's no good.
Don't underestimate the power of hush-money in this day and age, it's so incredibly powerful.
-
I can understand if someone grew up with a single race, they would probably want to keep it that way, but no two people have the exact same experiences and does it do anyone well to force them into something they are uncomfortable with? The problem is more complicated then mixing of races. Two people who grow up in the same neighborhood have similar experiences. Does it really matter what there race is?
One simple reason is that most white people do not want to live where violent crime is prevalent. Blacks commit violent crime at insanely disproportionate rates compared to whites. This takes into consideration all black age groups, both genders, household income, whether they live in poverty or not, or any other "socio-economic" factors.
So, where a significant number of blacks are, violent crime is prevalent. Therefore, whites generally do not want to live around blacks
You mentioned the government manipulating neighborhoods. I do think that is wrong and the government should stay out of it, but how do we change that? How do we get the government to stop using people as pawns to force an ungodly society?
If you are looking for real, observable change you get it by creating intentionally white communities
-
So just abandon blacks to their violent behavior that has been instigated by the government in which they live under? To me that seems like just a bandaid fix to a greater governmental problem. My opinion is that bandaids don't usually solve the problem in the long run.
I mean it is not really about a race destroying communities. It is about liberals making bank on their poor policies and then leaving the communities they allowed to be destroyed by these poloicies to then do it again for their new community. California is a great example of the rich people messing up the state and then going to other states but it's not stopped because they have money. Does it work the same way in Australia?
-
So just abandon blacks to their violent behavior that has been instigated by the government in which they live under? To me that seems like just a bandaid fix to a greater governmental problem. My opinion is that bandaids don't usually solve the problem in the long run.
I mean it is not really about a race destroying communities. It is about liberals making bank on their poor policies and then leaving the communities they allowed to be destroyed by these poloicies to then do it again for their new community. California is a great example of the rich people messing up the state and then going to other states but it's not stopped because they have money. Does it work the same way in Australia?
You say "abandon" as if white people have some sort of obligation to take care of them. The same white people getting robbed, assaulted, raped, and murdered while the government steals their money to give to the people doing these things. The violent behavior is not instigated, it's exacerbated. Yes, it is about race. Stop excusing violent criminals
-
You say "abandon" as if white people have some sort of obligation to take care of them. The same white people getting robbed, assaulted, raped, and murdered while the government steals their money to give to the people doing these things. The violent behavior is not instigated, it's exacerbated. Yes, it is about race. Stop excusing violent criminals
I am not excusing their violent behavior, but it was white people who were money hungry that put the Africans in the US in the first place to be slaves. It was the white man who set up the social service programs that made certain races fatherless. You can't solve a problem if you don't look at the roots that caused it to progress that way in the first place. Just separating races isn't going to solve anything. And how would you like the separation to happen? I am a minority in my neighborhood because I moved to where I could afford a house. Should the police come in and take away my 7 acres and house because I am the wrong race for the neighborhood?
We need to hunker down on corruption, so people can naturally drift to communities that fit their needs. Most likely that will look like segregation, but nobody can really make that happen until the government stops playing the races against each other.
-
I am not excusing their violent behavior, but it was white people who were money hungry that put the Africans in the US in the first place to be slaves. It was the white man who set up the social service programs that made certain races fatherless. You can't solve a problem if you don't look at the roots that caused it to progress that way in the first place. Just separating races isn't going to solve anything. And how would you like the separation to happen? I am a minority in my neighborhood because I moved to where I could afford a house. Should the police come in and take away my 7 acres and house because I am the wrong race for the neighborhood?
We need to hunker down on corruption, so people can naturally drift to communities that fit their needs. Most likely that will look like segregation, but nobody can really make that happen until the government stops playing the races against each other.
The slave trade was very much in the hands of the "chosen" but leaving that aside, there was no slavery in California or New York or Detroit so the blacks arrived in these places poor very much like the whites.
If the Japanese and Germans managed to recover after the destruction of WW2 within 20 years, there is no reason that a black person can't recover 150 years after the end of the slavery. The only explanation possible for their behavior is a genetic one.
-
The slave trade was very much in the hands of the "chosen" but leaving that aside, there was no slavery in California or New York or Detroit so the blacks arrived in these places poor very much like the whites.
If the Japanese and Germans managed to recover after the destruction of WW2 within 20 years, there is no reason that a black person can't recover 150 years after the end of the slavery. The only explanation possible for their behavior is a genetic one.
The Government of Germany was run by the Germans. The government of Japan was run by the Japanese. The government of California or New York or Detroit, though highly populated by poor blacks were run by Whites. It is not the same comparison.
I am not sure how we are suppose to correct the problem. How does a black person recover if the government isn't their own people?
Maybe their is a little genetics involved, but I don't believe it is the only explanation possible.
-
I am not excusing their violent behavior, but it was white people who were money hungry that put the Africans in the US in the first place to be slaves. It was the white man who set up the social service programs that made certain races fatherless.
Jews are not white :confused: And any whites that were involved, so what? Nothing that was done 200 years ago excuses black crime today
You can't solve a problem if you don't look at the roots that caused it to progress that way in the first place.
You're right. One of those "roots" being that blacks are more prone to violent behavior than white people
Just separating races isn't going to solve anything.
I don't think what I'm saying is getting through to you. Any socio-economic factors aside, blacks still commit violent crime at a rate much higher than white people. Whites in the same situation as blacks commit violent crime with much less frequency. Blacks separated from whites would greatly reduce the number of white people being robbed, assaulted, raped, and murdered.
And how would you like the separation to happen? I am a minority in my neighborhood because I moved to where I could afford a house. Should the police come in and take away my 7 acres and house because I am the wrong race for the neighborhood?
How would I like to see it happen? Forced segregation. What can be done about it right now, though, is whites creating their own communities
We need to hunker down on corruption, so people can naturally drift to communities that fit their needs. Most likely that will look like segregation, but nobody can really make that happen until the government stops playing the races against each other.
Whites only communities are whites naturally choosing whom they want to live around. It's happening right now. No need to "drift". There are white people making conscious decisions to join whites only communities. That is a choice with real, observable results..unlike voting (possibly save for local elections)
-
The Government of Germany was run by the Germans. The government of Japan was run by the Japanese. The government of California or New York or Detroit, though highly populated by poor blacks were run by Whites. It is not the same comparison.
I am not sure how we are suppose to correct the problem. How does a black person recover if the government isn't their own people?
Maybe their is a little genetics involved, but I don't believe it is the only explanation possible.
Haiti has been independent since around 1800 and run by local people. How are they doing?
Ethiopia wasn't colonised until a brief occupation by Italy in 1935. How are they doing?
-
This kind of talk just makes me feel like I have no culture to belong to.
Each culture has distinct beliefs, morals, traditions etc. once they become established in a specific region.
Until recently, Caucasians (from many different countries) in North America had established a new culture specific to North America. In other words they blended their previous cultures to suit everyone.
H O W E V E R, although other races and cultures admired and wanted what we were able to establish, they came but refused to blend. Look at any city...they congregate with their own kind even refusing to learn the language except for "give me".
The descendants of the slaves have had a couple centuries to join the blend but not only do they refuse our culture they don't even practice the culture of their forefathers. They merely exist...and not always by acceptable means.
I don't mean to be unkind, but if you feel like you have no culture, it's up to you to decide which beliefs, morals traditions etc. form a culture you want to belong to.
Various cultures of the world are millenia old, North American culture is only a couple hundred years old. And yes it was formed by Caucasians because it was mainly Caucasians who built the country we now have.
-
The descendants of the slaves have had a couple centuries to join the blend but not only do they refuse our culture they don't even practice the culture of their forefathers. They merely exist...and not always by acceptable means.
This is a very narrow view. People respond to how they are treated. I have no trouble getting along or living with others who do not match my skin color and I have been doing it for years. The neighborhoods I walk in are not scary or run down and the majority of the people here are black. I do not believe that my pocket of North America is the only exception.
I don't mean to be unkind, but if you feel like you have no culture, it's up to you to decide which beliefs, morals traditions etc. form a culture you want to belong to.
Various cultures of the world are millenia old, North American culture is only a couple hundred years old. And yes it was formed by Caucasians because it was mainly Caucasians who built the country we now have.
I have the Catholic culture. When I said I have no culture, I meant I do not have a single race culture. I was thinking about if people got their way and forced to live with their like colored skinned, I would not like living with all white people, because that has never been what I have known. I don't object to others wanting that, but I don't want the choice forced on me.
What I have learned in my life is that most people mirror the ones they are around. So if you are a practicing Catholic and show charity as God intended, then the color of people's skin, doesn't really matter.
If you really want society to correct itself, then bringing God back to the masses is a better solution.
-
This is a very narrow view.
I have the Catholic culture. When I said I have no culture, I meant I do not have a single race culture.
I disagree. It's just every day observation.
I wasn't referring to Catholic culture and fully understood you were referring to race culture.
If most people thought about it seriously, I think they'd find they are not against any race or skin colour but object strongly to the culture of the people who just happen to have skin of a different colour. That's where the" term culture shock" comes in. Society just pushes the term racist so every goes along. As close as race and culture are they really are two different things, that's why people can get along with some people of another race and not with others of the same race. It's really culture.
-
Whites only communities are whites naturally choosing whom they want to live around. It's happening right now. No need to "drift". There are white people making conscious decisions to join whites only communities. That is a choice with real, observable results..unlike voting (possibly save for local elections)
OK, but are the people who are white and don't want to live in a white only community going to be looked down upon because they think differently?
-
The descendants of the slaves have had a couple centuries to join the blend but not only do they refuse our culture they don't even practice the culture of their forefathers. They merely exist...and not always by acceptable means.
I disagree. It's just every day observation.
Because the US is soooo big, people in different locations have different observations. From my observations, I do see blacks that have blended into society. The quiet black neighborhoods are not going to show up in the media, but they do exist. :cowboy:
-
OK, but are the people who are white and don't want to live in a white only community going to be looked down upon because they think differently?
Why are you asking me this?
-
Why are you asking me this?
I asked you because of this statement below.
How would I like to see it happen? Forced segregation. What can be done about it right now, though, is whites creating their own communities
Whites only communities are whites naturally choosing whom they want to live around. It's happening right now. No need to "drift". There are white people making conscious decisions to join whites only communities. That is a choice with real, observable results..unlike voting (possibly save for local elections)
I guess it gives me the impression that if you are white then you are more important and you have to save that importance because it is being destroyed.
But I don't believe my importance lies in the color of my skin. I believe that only reason I am alive is to know, love, and serve God in this world and be happy with him forever in Heaven.
Hence my question below.
OK, but are the people who are white and don't want to live in a white only community going to be looked down upon because they think differently?
-
OK, but are the people who are white and don't want to live in a white only community going to be looked down upon because they think differently?
You're an adult and you still care about what other people think? Some people like blue, some people hate blue and only like red. Some people hate both blue and red. Who cares?
-
You're an adult and you still care about what other people think? Some people like blue, some people hate blue and only like red. Some people hate both blue and red. Who cares?
Colors are different than people, but go ahead and misinterpret what I said. The slippery slope of deciding the "goodness" of people based on the color of one's skin doesn't sound like a Catholic thing to do. And if people are starting these communities out of fear of becoming extinct, then I guess they don't trust God. But that is only my opinion and nobody has to agree with it.
-
Get rid of commie, atheist/satanic jews running your govt and your racial problems go away.
As for those "white" communities, I don't see no doctrine in Church which denies freedom of association or protecting your families from a savage group of people brainwashed and indoctrinated by a evil, manipulating, satanic cult hell bent on destroying every culture it has sunk it's fangs into. We have not only a right, but a duty to seperate ourselves and families the best we can from this madness.
-
Colors are different than people, but go ahead and misinterpret what I said. The slippery slope of deciding the "goodness" of people based on the color of one's skin doesn't sound like a Catholic thing to do.
Deciding the "risk factor" of living amongst people who disproportionately commit violent crime sounds like a prudent thing to do. Prudence being one of the four cardinal virtues
And if people are starting these communities out of fear of becoming extinct, then I guess they don't trust God.
You guess wrong, and this is a pathetic thing to say. Do you walk towards oncoming traffic? Would you buy a house nextdoor to a pedophile? Let your children play with rat poison? You don't do these things? Wow, I guess you don't trust in God
But that is only my opinion and nobody has to agree with it.
We know
-
Get rid of commie, atheist/satanic jews running your govt and your racial problems go away.
As for those "white" communities, I don't see no doctrine in Church which denies freedom of association or protecting your families from a savage group of people brainwashed and indoctrinated by a evil, manipulating, satanic cult hell bent on destroying every culture it has sunk it's fangs into. We have not only a right, but a duty to seperate ourselves and families the best we can from this madness.
But you as an individual has no power to get rid of the corrupt government. At this point in time planting Catholic seeds for conversion and your own habits of prayer and sacrifice will be bring down the graces that effect change. The solutions that white only communities and Catholic only communities do is just make life easier with less suffering. Suffering effects graces. Accepting and offering up where God puts you and living the best Catholic life in those situations is what brings down graces.
-
The solutions that white only communities and Catholic only communities do is just make life easier with less suffering.
I'm not for or against this idea, but I am for people doing what they want to do. The other point is, the govt has been fostering race-issues for decades. In some areas of the country, people banding together might be a matter of self-defense. Violence towards 'white privilege' is increasing, due to propaganda.
Suffering effects graces. Accepting and offering up where God puts you and living the best Catholic life in those situations is what brings down graces.
Life will always have suffering; God will take care of that. Even the idea of moving and building a new community is a suffering. It's a TON of work. Because who REALLY wants to do it? People who attempt such have reached the point of no other alternative. I'm sure most of these people would rather live in a normal neighborhood. 20 years ago, when things were more normal, nobody talked about setting up such a community. Why not? Because there was no danger.
Secondly, most times, God sends suffering as a motivation to CHANGE. It's a blessing disguised as a suffering. Like when a child asks for $ and the parent says, "No, but you can earn money by doing some extra chores." That's a suffering to earn the extra $, but it's because the parent wanted to teach the child about hard work and the rewards of it.
Thirdly, we are not required to accept all sufferings as permanent and just sit there and do nothing. If we are out of milk, we don't just sit in the house and offer up our problem as a "suffering". We go to the store and buy some more.
Fourthly, suffering which CANNOT BE FIXED THROUGH EFFORTS, is that which we must accept. And most of the time, it is temporary. The suffering is mostly about patience. Eventually, God fixes that which we cannot fix.
As the old saying goes -- Work as if it all depends on you; pray as if it all depends on God.
Nothing wrong with starting a community of people you can trust. It's common sense and a response to the situation in the world today.
-
The only thing I want to add is never under estimate the workings of the Guardian Angels. I think we have forgotten them and think that we are supposed to survive without them. Everybody in the world has a Guardian Angel that wants to help their person get to Heaven.
-
Hey! Soft Pillow! I found your Guardian Angel! I wouldn’t mess with him, right?
(https://i.imgur.com/qC1wlQn.jpeg)
-
White race-traitors and defilers will get their due when the missiles fly, hence, there is confusion and chaos in the fog of war, as there will be no ZOG to protect them anymore. It will be natural law, and only the strong in mind, spirit and body will survive. Dossiers on race-traitors/defilers, jews, communists, feminists, fαɢɢօts, freemasons, Satanists, atheists, muslims and muds are real. ;)
-
White race-traitors and defilers will get their due when the missiles fly, hence, there is confusion and chaos in the fog of war, as there will be no ZOG to protect them anymore. It will be natural law, and only the strong in mind, spirit and body will survive. Dossiers on race-traitors/defilers, jews, communists, feminists, fαɢɢօts, freemasons, Satanists, atheists, muslims and muds are real. ;)
If you can’t take it, don’t dish it out.
-
If you can’t take it, don’t dish it out.
Your comment makes no sense but it could be a dishonest inversion of reality.
Love ya, Boomer.
-
Mexicans are not white.
-
Mexicans are not white.
A lot of them are. It's not all just one skin tone.
There are classrooms full of people who look like Nick Fuentes at every upscale private school in Mexico. They are the country's landed gentry: business owners, politicians, CEOs, entertainers, etc. You never notice them because a lot of them speak fluent English through private tutors and going abroad.
-
A real Mexican is mixed race at best, not white.
A black man with the last name "Smith" or "Long" which are obviously English surnames, doesn't make that black man white. No one would be calling Nick mixed if he didn't have a Spanish last name. People really show their ignorance when it comes to this stuff.
You can also have a Spanish last name and be as white as a Swede. Ever heard of most of Northern Spain. lol
Africans and Indians of the Americas started taking European names a longgggg time ago.
-
A lot of them are. It's not all just one skin tone.
There are classrooms full of people who look like Nick Fuentes at every upscale private school in Mexico. They are the country's landed gentry: business owners, politicians, CEOs, entertainers, etc. You never notice them because a lot of them speak fluent English through private tutors and going abroad.
Fuentes is the spitting-image of Ben Shapiro; they could be brothers. Whatever race that is...
-
A lot of them are. It's not all just one skin tone.
There are classrooms full of people who look like Nick Fuentes at every upscale private school in Mexico. They are the country's landed gentry: business owners, politicians, CEOs, entertainers, etc. You never notice them because a lot of them speak fluent English through private tutors and going abroad.
This is true. In college, I knew an all White Mexican international student from Mexico here in the States. They're still a small minority compared to the rest of the Mexican population.
Anyway, if I recall correctly, Fuentes, recently, stated that the Mexican part of him is indigenous ancestry but it's only 15% of his genes. 85% of his genes are White - Italian and Irish. He's 100% full throttle into 14/88 and 14/28, and even more into Catholic nationalism :cowboy:.