Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: To those frustrated with non-Resistance Catholics on CathInfo  (Read 14214 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: To those frustrated with non-Resistance Catholics on CathInfo
« Reply #20 on: April 22, 2018, 06:12:49 PM »
I asked the sspx priest today if Francis is still pope.  He responded by making a gesture of doubt and said he is not catholic.  To me you have the sede position and you have the position that a non catholic is your pope and head of the Church of Christ 

Re: To those frustrated with non-Resistance Catholics on CathInfo
« Reply #21 on: April 22, 2018, 08:50:34 PM »
Comment: Unlike Archbishop Lefebvre, Matthew has no qualms about "bringing the wolf into the sheepfold."
This comment implies that sedevacantists are not part of the sheepfold.  Sean, are sedes Catholic?


Re: To those frustrated with non-Resistance Catholics on CathInfo
« Reply #22 on: April 22, 2018, 09:25:04 PM »
2. Even if you want to put sedevacantism on the "not erroneous and/or sinful" bookshelf, even then you have a problem here. Apart from the "doctrine" of sedevacantism, we also have their "attitude" to deal with. I'm sure you know what I'm talking about. The above excerpt from the Archbishop illustrates this nicely (thanks Sean).

:laugh1:
You mean like the dogmatic sedeplenist, anti-sedevacantist attitude displayed by certain members here?  
   

Re: To those frustrated with non-Resistance Catholics on CathInfo
« Reply #23 on: April 22, 2018, 09:31:03 PM »
This comment implies that sedevacantists are not part of the sheepfold.  Sean, are sedes Catholic?
Don’t expect an answer from the Grand Poobah.  You are too lowly for him to waste any time on you.  He is too busy being the top theologian for the resistance.  And since you are obviously a dogmatic sede (we believe that theoretically it is possible that non-dogmatic sedes exist but we have never run across one in the wild), we shan’t waste any of our valuable time trying to convert you to the true religion headed up by our esteemed Pope Francis, whose portrait adorns our chapels and who we are subject to as evidenced by our naming him in the canon of our Masses even if it is true that we systematically reject his authority over us in every imaginable way.  If you even think there might be something wrong with our position, you are not Catholic, unless, of course, you attend a Novus Ordo Mass (which is harmful for you), in which case, you are indubitably Catholic. Capish?

Re: To those frustrated with non-Resistance Catholics on CathInfo
« Reply #24 on: April 22, 2018, 10:02:10 PM »
Don’t expect an answer from the Grand Poobah.  You are too lowly for him to waste any time on you.  He is too busy being the top theologian for the resistance.  And since you are obviously a dogmatic sede (we believe that theoretically it is possible that non-dogmatic sedes exist but we have never run across one in the wild), we shan’t waste any of our valuable time trying to convert you to the true religion headed up by our esteemed Pope Francis, whose portrait adorns our chapels and who we are subject to as evidenced by our naming him in the canon of our Masses even if it is true that we systematically reject his authority over us in every imaginable way.  If you even think there might be something wrong with our position, you are not Catholic, unless, of course, you attend a Novus Ordo Mass (which is harmful for you), in which case, you are indubitably Catholic. Capish?
Sean will not come out and say that sedes are not Catholic. That would make his dogmatic position clear.  It would also contradict Matthew's position regarding sedes (well, most of them anyway).  Just as dogmatic sedevacantists get the boot here, dogmatic sedeplenists should get the boot here as well.