Does Vigano accept Vatican II as an ecuŠ¼enical council of the Church and its official teaching?
Does he accept the new "mass" and sacraments as valid?
Does he hold the abomination in the Vatican since at least 1962 is not the Catholic Church?
If not, I don't understand why 62% of supposedly traditional Catholics support him.
If yes, good for him, I hope he sincerely searches for the fullness of truth and saves his soul by leaving the false sect.
Answer is ... he's not articulated this clearly. He's come a hair's breadth from saying that the Holy See if vacant, has referred to Bergoglio as an NWO operative, has in fact never called him Francis, much less Holy Father, but always just Berogoglio. He says that V2 is the work of Masons trying to destroy the Church, and it's fundamentally flawed, to the point of being unsalvageable, that it cannot be corrected but must be pitched entirely. He certainly holds that the NOM is not a Catholic Mass. He's said that it's possible that Bergoglio is not the Pope and that it must be investigated (in the context of Bennyvcantism ... although he's criticized Ratzinger and Wojtyla as well, not something that your typical Bennyvacantists would care to do).
In short, he's saying pretty much what Archbishop Lefebvre said (and at times is even more emphatic about it). Why did/do the vast majority of Traditional Catholics support Archbishop Lefebvre?
So, he hasn't come out (at least publicly) yet as a sedevacantist. Does that somehow make him less of a Catholic or Traditional Catholic that Archbishop Lefebvre was?
Poll
Topic: The Msgr. Vigano Poll (Read 13370 times)