To properly understand Vigano, we must first understand the "balance of powers" as outlined in the US Constitution (not currently being followed) in which the executive branch, the legislative branch and the judicial branch are separate but equal. (Were our founding docuŠ¼ents being followed, the alphabet police would be smacked down by both the legislative and juducial branches).
When has this ever really worked? Do you consider Tammany Hall vs the Society of the Cincinnati to be an example of good early politics? Or was it always meant to be exploited, vindicating the Anti-Federalists? Not to say a Catholic would necessarily want to support them either.
If this is clear, it's easy to understand what Vigano said regarding peaceful coexistence of nations, without there being one nation that considers itself superior and legitimized to subjugate the others. (As the US deep state globalists do now.)
Basically he restated part of the Russian state ideology: unilateralism ("one nation") has got to go! Multilateralism is the desired future of the Eurasianists. If he is a neutral observer, why would he push this same message and support Putin? This multilateralism also includes
Communist China as one of the poles of influence.
Rightly understood, this is the polar opposite of globalism with it's "International Police Force" to enforce the Communist, anti-God "The Great Reset" in which nations exist in name only.
In multilateralism
Communist China becomes the military enforcement arm which replaces the United States. That's not to say support Biden and his wicked regime, but the horror of that next new world order is still nothing compared to our miserable present. Destroying the present order is necessary in order to usher in that renewed (global) Red Terror.
Poll
Topic: The Msgr. Vigano Poll (Read 13298 times)