Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: SSPX UK,FR,SP. bishops dont agree the deal. UK bishop said to me.  (Read 22143 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ethelred

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1222
  • Reputation: +2267/-0
  • Gender: Male
SSPX UK,FR,SP. bishops dont agree the deal. UK bishop said to me.
« Reply #105 on: May 29, 2012, 02:12:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Zorayda
    We are now at a crossroad where the blind & gullible faction blindly follows Fellay to newRome and the thinking side that will not sell their souls for a so-called recognition are being told to just trust the infiltrators who want to kill SSPX. We are obliged to always discern the spirits when we are tempted.
    [..]
    We have blindly donated thousands of dollars to SSPX for the past 8 years and we have given them our absolute trust & loyalty. But now I see how how money & power at the highest levels corrupt even good priests.

    Trento: Fr. Couture & Bp. Fellay is accountable for every soul they are in charge with and every penny they take from those souls. That's straight talk from a mother of 7 children who doesn't hide behind a fake name. If you think I have an axe to grind, God's holy axe is even bigger.


    It's true what you say. And these are very sad facts... Especially for those who only now learn about the betrayal in the SSPX. Some catholics already saw it coming when the SSPX leadership rode roughshod over one of its own bishops in 2009. But anyway, now the betrayal is there totally and it's not masked any longer.

    Concerning Fr. Couture I'd only like to say again that unfortunately he's 100% behind Bp Fellay, and so he's also opposed to Bishop Williamson and the other clerics who follow Archbishop Lefebvre in resisting the SSPX sellout to New-Rome.


    Generally speaking I'm surprised how the so called "followers" of Archbishop Lefebvre can tell and do the exact opposite of what he said and did. They use him as a fig-leaf today. A crying shame...

    Obviously the great problem is that not enough leading SSPX priests, or Bp Fellay, understand the nature of modernism. It is such a corrupt and dangerous "animal", and New-Rome and the New-Pope are totally infected with it.

    Unfortunately the modern man has lost the object, because he has wanted to lose it. It takes away his liberty to change reality according to his wishes...
    That's also why there was The Fall, isn't it?

    Offline trento

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 818
    • Reputation: +245/-144
    • Gender: Male
    SSPX UK,FR,SP. bishops dont agree the deal. UK bishop said to me.
    « Reply #106 on: May 29, 2012, 02:37:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Zorayda
    Exactly Telesphorus!

    We are now at a crossroad where the blind & gullible faction blindly follows Fellay to newRome and the thinking side that will not sell their souls for a so-called recognition are being told to just trust the infiltrators who want to kill SSPX.We are obliged to always discern the spirits when we are tempted. This whole crisis reminds me of those poor souls who died in 9/11 because they were told to go back to their offices instead of exiting the twin towers like my friend did...and she was in a leg cast. Don't listen to stupid people!

    We have blindly donated thousands of dollars to SSPX for the past 8 years and we have given them our absolute trust & loyalty. But now I see how how money & power at the highest levels corrupt even good priests.

    Trento: Fr. Couture & Bp. Fellay is accountable for every soul they are in charge with and every penny they take from those souls. That's straight talk from a mother of 7 children who doesn't hide behind a fake name. If you think I have an axe to grind, God's holy axe is even bigger.


    So why aren't you exiting? What else do is needed to show that there's an agenda behind your foul behavior?

    Perhaps your donations were more than mine, but does it give you the license to go around maligning or disrespecting others with impunity, more so in a public forum, and consecrated souls at that?

    This is also the 2nd time that you wrote about you and your 7 kids. No offense to mothers out there, but besides money, is having lots of kids, somehow a 'Traditional Catholic license' for dictating and imposing one's will upon others? Is this how Traditional Catholics behave?


    Offline Francisco

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1151
    • Reputation: +843/-18
    • Gender: Male
    SSPX UK,FR,SP. bishops dont agree the deal. UK bishop said to me.
    « Reply #107 on: May 29, 2012, 06:21:40 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ethelred
    Zorayda, I agree with you on the objective betrayal in the SSPX.
    Please let's still keep unemotional and focused on the important things. We're in danger of getting angry because of what is happening (in particular I do), but it's important to have clean conversations with our opponents.

    Quite difficult to do so when someone is made of Teflon. Completely frustrating. Menzingen simply had to do an audit on the trips undertaken to see if there was substance to the complaints made out to them. He has his fanatical supporters who have made him into another Papa Doc Duvalier - President for Life. What is rotten is soon going to fall. "Keep the Faith" he keeps telling us. Ironically, a "deal" may spell the end of The Society in Asia.

    Offline Angelia

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 19
    • Reputation: +87/-0
    • Gender: Male
    SSPX UK,FR,SP. bishops dont agree the deal. UK bishop said to me.
    « Reply #108 on: May 29, 2012, 08:35:04 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ethelred-Indeed when (smaller) children start to disturb the Holy Mass, it's appropriate for one of the parents or older siblings to move to the background or mother-child-rooms with them. Usually these rooms got loud-speakers so the baby-sitters can still hear the Holy Mass and sermon.

    I see how you would think a crying room is useful for everyone. But you have to know that our crying room in Malaysia is not what you invision. Our crying room is a room that the mothers have to share with other parents with young kids that are old enough to sit outside. No one bother to make sure that the crying room is actually for crying babies. And it has only one small pew that can sit one parent with 2 small kids. The rest have to sit in the back of the room,3ft away where it is within reach of a a book shelf full of books for sale.  

    You think it is difficult to control a hyper child in the chapel until you walk into our 'crying room'. Even a well behave child becomes naughty.  Mind you the chapel itself is very small. the size of the crying room.. And you said when a child acts up it is good to go to the crying room. I don't know any mother who would sit in the front pew while her child screams his head off..we have no problem using the room. But have you heard of priest pulling a mother into the crying room before the Mass starts and the baby is not even crying or making any noise because the coordinator thinks that we are compromising the sanctity of the chapel.

    I have always tried to teach my children to behave at Mass from birth. We have occasion outburst but they are less than 30 secs in. Any longer I would move to the crying room to settle them and come out again. Because I have found the crying room an environment that is not inductive for a child or baby to pay attention to the Mass. It is just a playground to them. And as the chapel is jam packed it is not even a crying room anymore but that doesn't stop the persecutors from giving death stares at toddlers for making occasional babbling noise...it isn't even crying.

    Catholics are suppose to have as many children as God pleases but the lack of toleration from adults for innocent children is really appaling. We are not nagging, we are handling the situation and just want to share with you the type of things that can happen in a little chapel where the priest and people in power play politics.

    These treatments are not across the board for all children that are noisy. Some older kids can bang their feet and hands on the pews or walk up and down the aisle during the sermon..these 'police' in the chapel wouldn't even bat an eyelid. But one babble from my baby, you think I have kill his father!




    trenton-So why aren't you exiting? What else do is needed to show that there's an agenda behind your foul behavior

    Trento, we don't just leave because we are being persecuted by priest and layman. The purpose of going to Mass is the sacrifice of the Mass, to fulfill my Sunday obligation. I didn't come here for the other people or to please them. If I was what you say, an emotional mess as you describe us, we would have been long gone. On the other hand I see that by your constant suggestion the that we should leave only tells me that you are here because you found friends. If they are not friendly to you, you would think it would be just, to leave and high tail out of there.

    Foul behavior..I don't even understand what you think we have done that is so foul. You find us airing the dirty laundry, filty, but you don't find the laundry a bit dirty..you have one disturbed mind. There is a limit to defends. I have only given facts. I have not peppered salted anything. You have eyes, you do not see, ears you do not hear.

    The bottom line good priests make good faithful. When we have good non nonsense priest, we never get persecuted..but the moment a new priest who is easily influenced by the coordinator comes to serve us, in no time at all the same rhetroric comes up. This is real persecution.

    All this for what..because we wanted to support a move to a bigger place.

    Trento..we know your Mecca is Thou shall not talk bad of priests and bishops.This is your one and only defence.

    My Agenda...for once I would like to attend Mass in peace, free from persecution. But I will have to wait until this deal goes through first. I know God is not offended by the presence of the little ones no matter how noisy they may be...they can't offend God..yet somehow they can offend Man...


    As for going to 2 separate masses at different times..not possible..we have only one evening mass but even then I was even asked to stay home with little ones who doesnt cry...somehow they found baby babbling super annoying even when it is only for a second. Can one parent watch over 6-7 small children?

    We have not dictated anything..we have always been on the receiving end of the dictatives.

    ...

    We mention our children over and over again...because they are the future of the Church whom these people chose to shamelessly attack.  And what have we impose on them...we only ask for a bigger chapel to be run by a local malaysian priest that converted to Tradition instead of a coordinator who limit everyone's access to the chapel and priests. A coordinator that even dictates when, where or how the priest do anything.   Of course that is way before your time if you even need a 3rd party source to verify the facts.

    The extend of the control is beyond your imagination. More than a handful of parishioners at their house clearly heard the coordinator boasting how she reprimanded the district superior for doing penance in her house. She was relating to us that she found out the priest slept on the floor the night before as the mattress was not slept on. so she scolded him " no one sleeps on my floor" to the embarrassment of the priest. And she was so very proud that she reprimanded him and somehow waiting to hear our acknowledgement of approval?! Are we the dictator here...I think not!

    If the SSPX continue to be ruled by such leaders, it will be the end for our children be they 1 or 10.

    But no matter what we say..it will violate your only code of honor. So I think this is my last post because I really don't want to hear your broken record...

    Offline Angelia

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 19
    • Reputation: +87/-0
    • Gender: Male
    SSPX UK,FR,SP. bishops dont agree the deal. UK bishop said to me.
    « Reply #109 on: May 29, 2012, 08:43:19 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Francisco
    Quote from: Ethelred
    Zorayda, I agree with you on the objective betrayal in the SSPX.
    Please let's still keep unemotional and focused on the important things. We're in danger of getting angry because of what is happening (in particular I do), but it's important to have clean conversations with our opponents.

    Quite difficult to do so when someone is made of Teflon. Completely frustrating. Menzingen simply had to do an audit on the trips undertaken to see if there was substance to the complaints made out to them. He has his fanatical supporters who have made him into another Papa Doc Duvalier - President for Life. What is rotten is soon going to fall. "Keep the Faith" he keeps telling us. Ironically, a "deal" may spell the end of The Society in Asia.


    Funny you say this. We did bring this up with Fr. Nely. He admitted that Fr. couture was wrong and all the abuse thrown at the children also wrong...but say...he can't do anything about it because it is upto Fr. Couture to change...


    Being a superior, knowing something is wrong but do not stop it...you can say that it isn't because Fr. Nely couldn't do anything..he didn't want to do anything about it because this is part of a bigger plan....we when through all the points in the list of objections to move and he agree that they were not valid reasons at all and he clearly admitted to us that it is clearly done to protect the interest of the coordinator....now..it is time for the coordinator to protect the interest of the district superior. You scratch my back, i scratch your back.


    Offline Francisco

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1151
    • Reputation: +843/-18
    • Gender: Male
    SSPX UK,FR,SP. bishops dont agree the deal. UK bishop said to me.
    « Reply #110 on: May 29, 2012, 09:54:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ethelred

    Concerning Fr. Couture I'd only like to say again that unfortunately he's 100% behind Bp Fellay, and so he's also opposed to Bishop Williamson and the other clerics who follow Archbishop Lefebvre in resisting the SSPX sellout to New-Rome.



    SSPX ASIA is a small district as far as numbers and priests are concerned. Many of the priests are against the deal with Rome - they say so openly or privately. Strange situation for the moment at least. The inferiors have become superior and vice versa!

    Offline Ethelred

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1222
    • Reputation: +2267/-0
    • Gender: Male
    SSPX UK,FR,SP. bishops dont agree the deal. UK bishop said to me.
    « Reply #111 on: May 30, 2012, 01:16:11 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks to Francisco for the information about the Asia district.

    And thanks to Angelia for explaining the situation with this special mother-child-room. Now I understand. Very bad situation indeed. :-(


    Let's pray for Bishop Williamson, his allied two bishops and the allied clerics who try to save the SSPX.
    Bp Fellay, Fr Pfluger and their shameless sellout team must go. It's the only way to save the SSPX. Only God can help us with this. May he have mercy upon us.

    Offline Francisco

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1151
    • Reputation: +843/-18
    • Gender: Male
    SSPX UK,FR,SP. bishops dont agree the deal. UK bishop said to me.
    « Reply #112 on: May 30, 2012, 01:43:27 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ethelred
    Thanks to Francisco for the information about the Asia district.

    And thanks to Angelia for explaining the situation with this special mother-child-room. Now I understand. Very bad situation indeed. :-(


    Let's pray for Bishop Williamson, his allied two bishops and the allied clerics who try to save the SSPX.
    Bp Fellay, Fr Pfluger and their shameless sellout team must go. It's the only way to save the SSPX. Only God can help us with this. May he have mercy upon us.


    Ethelred, this is from the Anonymous department of this forum:
    .....It seems that the District Superior of the Asia District of the SSPX realizes that the majority of priests and faithful in his district are against the deal with Rome. It seems unlikely that he will publicly support the deal even though, as it has been claimed elsewhere on this forum, that he belongs to Bishop Fellay's "inner circle".

    Bishop Bernard Fellay seems to have inflicted severe damage on the morale of the priests, at least one of whom said he might quit the priesthood altogether. The priests no longer hide their views about Fellay.....

    Most of us will agree with you that Bp Fellay and his shameless sellout team must go. What do you think of FR PAUL MORGAN of the United Kingdom as the new Superior General?


    Offline trento

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 818
    • Reputation: +245/-144
    • Gender: Male
    SSPX UK,FR,SP. bishops dont agree the deal. UK bishop said to me.
    « Reply #113 on: May 30, 2012, 06:49:24 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Angelia
    Ethelred-Indeed when (smaller) children start to disturb the Holy Mass, it's appropriate for one of the parents or older siblings to move to the background or mother-child-rooms with them. Usually these rooms got loud-speakers so the baby-sitters can still hear the Holy Mass and sermon.

    I see how you would think a crying room is useful for everyone. But you have to know that our crying room in Malaysia is not what you invision. Our crying room is a room that the mothers have to share with other parents with young kids that are old enough to sit outside. No one bother to make sure that the crying room is actually for crying babies. And it has only one small pew that can sit one parent with 2 small kids. The rest have to sit in the back of the room,3ft away where it is within reach of a a book shelf full of books for sale.  

    You think it is difficult to control a hyper child in the chapel until you walk into our 'crying room'. Even a well behave child becomes naughty.  Mind you the chapel itself is very small. the size of the crying room.. And you said when a child acts up it is good to go to the crying room. I don't know any mother who would sit in the front pew while her child screams his head off..we have no problem using the room. But have you heard of priest pulling a mother into the crying room before the Mass starts and the baby is not even crying or making any noise because the coordinator thinks that we are compromising the sanctity of the chapel.

    I have always tried to teach my children to behave at Mass from birth. We have occasion outburst but they are less than 30 secs in. Any longer I would move to the crying room to settle them and come out again. Because I have found the crying room an environment that is not inductive for a child or baby to pay attention to the Mass. It is just a playground to them. And as the chapel is jam packed it is not even a crying room anymore but that doesn't stop the persecutors from giving death stares at toddlers for making occasional babbling noise...it isn't even crying.

    Catholics are suppose to have as many children as God pleases but the lack of toleration from adults for innocent children is really appaling. We are not nagging, we are handling the situation and just want to share with you the type of things that can happen in a little chapel where the priest and people in power play politics.

    These treatments are not across the board for all children that are noisy. Some older kids can bang their feet and hands on the pews or walk up and down the aisle during the sermon..these 'police' in the chapel wouldn't even bat an eyelid. But one babble from my baby, you think I have kill his father!




    trenton-So why aren't you exiting? What else do is needed to show that there's an agenda behind your foul behavior

    Trento, we don't just leave because we are being persecuted by priest and layman. The purpose of going to Mass is the sacrifice of the Mass, to fulfill my Sunday obligation. I didn't come here for the other people or to please them. If I was what you say, an emotional mess as you describe us, we would have been long gone. On the other hand I see that by your constant suggestion the that we should leave only tells me that you are here because you found friends. If they are not friendly to you, you would think it would be just, to leave and high tail out of there.

    Foul behavior..I don't even understand what you think we have done that is so foul. You find us airing the dirty laundry, filty, but you don't find the laundry a bit dirty..you have one disturbed mind. There is a limit to defends. I have only given facts. I have not peppered salted anything. You have eyes, you do not see, ears you do not hear.

    The bottom line good priests make good faithful. When we have good non nonsense priest, we never get persecuted..but the moment a new priest who is easily influenced by the coordinator comes to serve us, in no time at all the same rhetroric comes up. This is real persecution.

    All this for what..because we wanted to support a move to a bigger place.

    Trento..we know your Mecca is Thou shall not talk bad of priests and bishops.This is your one and only defence.

    My Agenda...for once I would like to attend Mass in peace, free from persecution. But I will have to wait until this deal goes through first. I know God is not offended by the presence of the little ones no matter how noisy they may be...they can't offend God..yet somehow they can offend Man...


    As for going to 2 separate masses at different times..not possible..we have only one evening mass but even then I was even asked to stay home with little ones who doesnt cry...somehow they found baby babbling super annoying even when it is only for a second. Can one parent watch over 6-7 small children?

    We have not dictated anything..we have always been on the receiving end of the dictatives.

    ...

    We mention our children over and over again...because they are the future of the Church whom these people chose to shamelessly attack.  And what have we impose on them...we only ask for a bigger chapel to be run by a local malaysian priest that converted to Tradition instead of a coordinator who limit everyone's access to the chapel and priests. A coordinator that even dictates when, where or how the priest do anything.   Of course that is way before your time if you even need a 3rd party source to verify the facts.

    The extend of the control is beyond your imagination. More than a handful of parishioners at their house clearly heard the coordinator boasting how she reprimanded the district superior for doing penance in her house. She was relating to us that she found out the priest slept on the floor the night before as the mattress was not slept on. so she scolded him " no one sleeps on my floor" to the embarrassment of the priest. And she was so very proud that she reprimanded him and somehow waiting to hear our acknowledgement of approval?! Are we the dictator here...I think not!

    If the SSPX continue to be ruled by such leaders, it will be the end for our children be they 1 or 10.

    But no matter what we say..it will violate your only code of honor. So I think this is my last post because I really don't want to hear your broken record...


    Angelia, if you are reading this, here's my summary of the problems:

    This thread starts with accusations against Bishop Fellay doing a 'sellout'. Later it descended into accusations against Fr. Couture of supporting Bishop Fellay's 'sellout', and then the Lims were later added into your mudslinging litany. Chronologically, I can deduce that it first started out with misunderstandings between you and the Lims, then Fr. Couture came into the picture to mediate, thus you started attacking him as well when you did not like his decisions, and now with the latest developments between Rome and the Society, you had a brilliant eureka moment saying, "That's it! It was all planned from the very beginning, even decades ago!" The more you reveal, the more amazed I get!

    If my memory did not fail me, there was an occasion on my visit to the chapel many years back that the priest stopped his sermon temporarily when the noise was getting unbearable and only then, did your husband (I suppose the biggest family in the chapel were yours?) got the hint and took the noisy child into the crying room. Is that considered 'persecution'? On other visits, I did notice other children being noisy too, but I don't think it was your family and the parents promptly removed the child without having to wait for hints. I was seated at the back, so I could see what was going on. Obviously then, the problem is not with the children, but rather with the adults supervising the children! People in front will understandably stare behind if there are disturbances, and it could be from any child, not only yours.

    When I mediate a dispute between two feuding parties, I usually try to understand the situation and views and stories from both parties. Then I get third party witnesses for corroboration. So far, all the malicious comments against Fr. Couture came from you and you alone. Zorayda can speak for the Philippines or from the States where she regularly attends Mass, while I have my own observations and sources in Malaysia (not related to the Lims, FYI, and who also wishes to attend Holy Mass in peace like you do).

    You seem to take lightly serious faults such as calumniating priests and bishops, and forgetting other virtues such as obedience (provided obeying a particular order is not sinful in itself). Beware, what comes around goes around. The scandal coming from such violations is far-reaching and immense, especially on Internet forums such as these for they are stored and available, maybe even long after we are gone from the face of this earth!

    Regarding your account of the coordinator's extent of control on the priests, I could not believe it that you couldn't even tell when a person is jesting and or when a person is serious! Really? The laity telling a priest he could not do penance, and you actually bought it hook, line and sinker?  :facepalm: A sad saint really is a sad saint. My take is probably you have a choleric temperament and are easily ruffled or offended on the smallest of matters. You may deny it, but that's what I can conclude after reading your posts. Please, first be at peace with yourself, else you will always have this siege mentality that you are being targeted for 'persecution' which are of your own making. It will be sad when real persecution comes and hits you in the face, and you do no recognize it.

    Offline nadieimportante

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 771
    • Reputation: +496/-0
    • Gender: Male
    SSPX UK,FR,SP. bishops dont agree the deal. UK bishop said to me.
    « Reply #114 on: May 30, 2012, 11:24:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: finegan
    Quote from: Wessex


    If there is a rebellion ending talks with Rome and replacing the leadership, then the Society will rejuvenate itself but the bureaucracy will need completely overhauling to remove that  weakening 'spirit of reconciliation'.  


    .. Do the auxiliary bishops have the courage and energy to undertake the massive task of rebuilding the SSPX from the ground up? Who will pay for new chapel buildings, travel and living expenses, etc.? ..:


    I would not break away, let Fellay break away. We don't have to rebuild, just keep what we have. A "rebellion ending talks with Rome and replacing the leadership" is the most prudent path, and the easiest. It does not take any "energy" on the part of the three bishops to let the  Fellay's go their own way.
    "Wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it.
     Right is right even if no one is doing it." - Saint Augustine

    Offline JPaul

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3832
    • Reputation: +3723/-293
    • Gender: Male
    SSPX UK,FR,SP. bishops dont agree the deal. UK bishop said to me.
    « Reply #115 on: May 30, 2012, 12:40:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: nadieimportante
    Quote from: finegan
    Quote from: Wessex


    If there is a rebellion ending talks with Rome and replacing the leadership, then the Society will rejuvenate itself but the bureaucracy will need completely overhauling to remove that  weakening 'spirit of reconciliation'.  


    .. Do the auxiliary bishops have the courage and energy to undertake the massive task of rebuilding the SSPX from the ground up? Who will pay for new chapel buildings, travel and living expenses, etc.? ..:


    I would not break away, let Fellay break away. We don't have to rebuild, just keep what we have. A "rebellion ending talks with Rome and replacing the leadership" is the most prudent path, and the easiest. It does not take any "energy" on the part of the three bishops to let the  Fellay's go their own way.


    A good sentiment however, it is a certainty that Bishop Fellay and Mr. Krah have secured all assets and properties under Bishop Fellay's sole control.
    He will take everything with him, including the name.
    The others will be esssentially, penniless.