Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: SSPX Response to Bishop Williamson  (Read 187068 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: SSPX Response to Bishop Williamson
« Reply #30 on: January 30, 2025, 07:33:50 AM »
Quote
"before retiring to England."

How's that for a blatant lie in the SSPX obituary?
Right, PV.  This is a total lie.  +W didn't retire; the new-sspx "retired" (i.e. fired) him.  The integrity level of the new-sspx gets smaller by the day.

Re: SSPX Response to Bishop Williamson
« Reply #31 on: January 30, 2025, 08:04:25 AM »


This denial of their ecclesiastical history, and recognition & common respect for their former fratre, fits the rebranded, judaized SSPX perfectly.

Like the typical jew MO, they
“Cancelled” +W and rewrote their history. 



It fits well the way we perceive them today:

Top management is corrupt, yet, there still exists some individual priests who seek the truth, persevere and are Holy.


Offline Meg

Re: SSPX Response to Bishop Williamson
« Reply #32 on: January 30, 2025, 09:42:37 AM »
THEREFORE, if the SSPX were totally dissolved, say they were shut down by the government, sued for 500 billion and thus had to collapse, it would be 100% good, 0% bad, a total blessing for the world.

If the SSPX were to be dissolved, then what would our options be for the sacraments? You might say that there are plenty of sedevacantist chapels that we could go to, but what if we aren't sedevacantist?  And because there are so few Resistance chapels in the U.S., it's not an option for most of us.

At least the SSPX said something about Bishop Williamson. I didn't think that they would say anything at all, having kicked +W out of the SSPX many years ago now.

Offline OABrownson1876

  • Supporter
Re: SSPX Response to Bishop Williamson
« Reply #33 on: January 30, 2025, 09:51:41 AM »
Bishop Williamson will be missed and I enjoyed my three years at seminary under his rectorship.  We all know that Lord Williamson denied the great modern day dogma, "No salvation for those who deny the gas chambers."  He was an Episcopus non gratus, "a bishop not in grace," and I am surprised that he was not ousted from the SSPX much earlier.  

And then after the events of 911, when he called out the Bushes for their complicity in a masonic, deep state, adventure, this at last sealed his fate. He had become the dreaded "conspiracy theorist."  Lord Williamson was never expelled from the SSPX for doctrinal reasons, in fact when I was in seminary ('94-97') the general consensus among the seminary professors was, "Let us not preach against the New Mass, calling it a sin, because, after all, we want to gain converts to tradition."   

I remember our first year at seminary and the bishop gave us a blind quiz, asking us, "How many J's died in the gas chambers?"  I was the only seminarian who put a big fat "0" on my piece of paper.  I had already done my Auschwitz homework before arriving at the seminary.  The bishop wanted to know who answered "zero" on the quiz, and as I raised my hand, the bishop smiled.  What really disappointed me about the quiz is the fact that nine other seminarians had not done their homework prior to arrival at the seminary. 

Offline Everlast22

  • Supporter
Re: SSPX Response to Bishop Williamson
« Reply #34 on: January 30, 2025, 09:57:42 AM »
Bishop Williamson will be missed and I enjoyed my three years at seminary under his rectorship.  We all know that Lord Williamson denied the great modern day dogma, "No salvation for those who deny the gas chambers."  He was an Episcopus non gratus, "a bishop not in grace," and I am surprised that he was not ousted from the SSPX much earlier. 

And then after the events of 911, when he called out the Bushes for their complicity in a masonic, deep state, adventure, this at last sealed his fate. He had become the dreaded "conspiracy theorist."  Lord Williamson was never expelled from the SSPX for doctrinal reasons, in fact when I was in seminary ('94-97') the general consensus among the seminary professors was, "Let us not preach against the New Mass, calling it a sin, because, after all, we want to gain converts to tradition." 

I remember our first year at seminary and the bishop gave us a blind quiz, asking us, "How many J's died in the gas chambers?"  I was the only seminarian who put a big fat "0" on my piece of paper.  I had already done my Auschwitz homework before arriving at the seminary.  The bishop wanted to know who answered "zero" on the quiz, and as I raised my hand, the bishop smiled.  What really disappointed me about the quiz is the fact that nine other seminarians had not done their homework prior to arrival at the seminary.
THe question should have been:

How many civilian supply lines/innocent people did the US/UK/Soviet Union Murder with no intent to worry about them to begin with?