Author Topic: SSPX issues 28 Pages Profession to Pope (Read 1906 times)

Ladislaus · « **Reply #25 on:** June 25, 2026, 05:08:49 PM »

Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on June 25, 2026, 12:45:54 PM

Try as they may, they will never be the remnant so long as they keep desiring an agreement with Rome.

That is how they have changed sinced 2012. Which Bishop Morgan explained succinctly in his bulletin recently.

Stop it with this crap, which Bishop Williamson consistently repudiated. Bishop Williamson held that Catholics were in a disapora, and that there no single organization or group that had a monopoly on being some kind of "remnant".

So, to most of us it's painfully obvious that whatever group you belong to is absolutely NOT the remnant ... but a joke for not kicking you out a long time ago.

Against the Heresies · « **Reply #26 on:** June 25, 2026, 10:38:06 PM »

Quote from: Ladislaus on June 25, 2026, 05:06:08 PM

Not at all. I was a seminarian there, and the SSPX has ever avoided taking some formal official "position" on anything other than, say, defined dogmas. "Leadership" actually means precious little these days, other than referring to a kind of moral leadership, since none of them actually have jurisdiction. You'll find priests who doubt the validity of NO Orders, who lean sedevacantist, and perhaps even some closet Feeneyites. There's nothing anywhere in any SSPX docuмent even, which declares that SSPX priests are commanded to and presumed to adhere to any public statements issued by the Superior General.

Aren't you a bit embarrassed to make random claims about things you know little about in your unstoppable stream of words? (Perhaps you should read St. Thomas Aquinas about "verbosity".)
You don't have the slightest knowledge of the internal guidelines in Cor Unum and are simply speculating with complete naivety.

OABrownson1876 · « **Reply #27 on:** **Yesterday** at 10:54:34 PM »

The SSPX is a "Fraternity" as was made clear to us when I was a seminarian back in mid 90's. Because it is a fraternity the SSPX authorities have no binding authority to command its priests to "follow orders." It is not a religious order such as the Dominicans or Franciscans who order its members to go here or there. There is certainly no authority to bind the faithful, as the "Fraternal Society" does not include them anyway. Bp. Williamson was booted out, and it was not even over doctrine. Say what you will, but he was booted out over the "J" question.

TomGubbinsKimmage · « **Reply #28 on:** **Today** at 04:09:10 AM »

Quote from: Ladislaus on June 25, 2026, 05:08:49 PM

Stop it with this crap, which Bishop Williamson consistently repudiated. Bishop Williamson held that Catholics were in a disapora, and that there no single organization or group that had a monopoly on being some kind of "remnant".

So, to most of us it's painfully obvious that whatever group you belong to is absolutely NOT the remnant ... but a joke for not kicking you out a long time ago.

And yet he consecrated Bishops, including four independent ones.

For the lolz of course.

TomGubbinsKimmage · « **Reply #29 on:** **Today** at 04:09:46 AM »

Quote from: Against the Heresies on June 25, 2026, 10:38:06 PM

Aren't you a bit embarrassed to make random claims about things you know little about in your unstoppable stream of words? (Perhaps you should read St. Thomas Aquinas about "verbosity".)
You don't have the slightest knowledge of the internal guidelines in Cor Unum and are simply speculating with complete naivety.

Are you defending the SSPX?

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: SSPX issues 28 Pages Profession to Pope (Read 1906 times)

Ladislaus

Re: SSPX issues 28 Pages Profession to Pope

Against the Heresies

Re: SSPX issues 28 Pages Profession to Pope

OABrownson1876

Re: SSPX issues 28 Pages Profession to Pope

TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: SSPX issues 28 Pages Profession to Pope

TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: SSPX issues 28 Pages Profession to Pope