Author Topic: SSPX District notice concerning Ignis Ardens (Read 50016 times)

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #25 on:** May 01, 2011, 06:15:17 PM »

Quote from: clare

For what it's worth, I'm quite happy with the notice.

No biggie. It is your forum and your decision, etc.

Quote

I don't think that going on about it is particularly helpful.

That is okay -- others disagree :)

FWIW, the notice looks like mere chest thumping, meant to induce fear. I have not read ALL of the material, but I do not see anything slanderous. Embarrassing? Yes.

Quote

I await a ton of "Dislikes".

I doubt anyone will dislike you simply saying how you feel about the matter. For my part, I respect your opinion and your decision. Would I have done the same thing? Probably (well, definitely) not, but that is irrelevant.

I hope you are enjoying a wonderful Easter-tide, my dear :)

Emerentiana · « **Reply #26 on:** May 01, 2011, 07:12:30 PM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

I am curious how is it considered slander to say that someone who attends Jєωιѕн fundraisers is used by Bishop Fellay to represent the Society in the Williamson case, or slander to reveal that someone who publicly remarks that he is a fan of Madonna, 007, and the skin flick 9 1/2 weeks is on the board of SSPX girls schools.

These are simply facts. They are simply the truth, and the truth will set the SSPX free.

Certainly in a legal sense, there is no possible way this can be called slander or libel.

These are simply facts, and the any scandal or detraction that occurs because of the revelation of these facts is not a sin because the welfare and mission of the society depends on its leaders being held accountable for their actions.

Couldnt be more right, Tele! I found out in a very cruel way that there is NO freedom of speach in the Society.
Today is the one year anniversery of my "booting " from their chapel here.
Mostly because I rolled my eyes in displeasure during the THIRD scathing sermon against sedevacantism.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #27 on:** May 01, 2011, 07:37:26 PM »

Quote from: Emerentiana

Quote from: Telesphorus
I am curious how is it considered slander to say that someone who attends Jєωιѕн fundraisers is used by Bishop Fellay to represent the Society in the Williamson case, or slander to reveal that someone who publicly remarks that he is a fan of Madonna, 007, and the skin flick 9 1/2 weeks is on the board of SSPX girls schools.

These are simply facts. They are simply the truth, and the truth will set the SSPX free.

Certainly in a legal sense, there is no possible way this can be called slander or libel.

These are simply facts, and the any scandal or detraction that occurs because of the revelation of these facts is not a sin because the welfare and mission of the society depends on its leaders being held accountable for their actions.

Couldnt be more right, Tele! I found out in a very cruel way that there is NO freedom of speach in the Society.
Today is the one year anniversery of my "booting " from their chapel here.
Mostly because I rolled my eyes in displeasure during the THIRD scathing sermon against sedevacantism.

I never heard such a sermon at the chapel here, then again, the primary benefactors of the chapel are sedes.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #28 on:** May 01, 2011, 08:25:19 PM »

Quote from: clare

For what it's worth, I'm quite happy with the notice.

And I don't think that going on about it is particularly helpful.

Now I await a ton of "Dislikes".

You're happy at the way he slammed Ignis Ardens forum?

That almost sounds like Stockholm syndrome.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #29 on:** May 01, 2011, 11:36:29 PM »

Clare was never comfortable about the Krahgate thread; she mentioned that her conscience was sensitive about it from its beginning.

I would say more surrender to Divine Providence than Stockholm syndrome.