Quote from: roscoe

MO is that it is blasphemous to assert that Card Rampolla( close friend & confidant of Popes Leo, Pius & Card Raphael) was a freemason. I doubt he was legally elected. It is the Freemason Franz- Joseph that tries to 'veto' Rampolla

Possibly blasphemous is a little to strong of a term-- nearly blasphemous is probably more accurate.

The word "Blasphemy" is used in regard to words or speech directed against God, not "Cardinals".

Lacking in charity, yes, if there was "no proof". In this case what would be your standard for proof? A signed membership card?

Also, did you know pride is a sin? Yet you have it displayed twice in your signature. Can you explain that please? I could say that is "proof" you are championing the most serious of the seven deadly sins.

I could say that is "proof" you are championing the most serious of the seven deadly sins.

disjointed, barring fact you may not be an English speaker naturally, does not make sense....

also, kindly tell us about yourself in the intro section, if you ahve not done so, trust me, might clear up a lot down the road......

Quote from: ETAZMT

Quote from: roscoe

Quote from: roscoe

MO is that it is blasphemous to assert that Card Rampolla( close friend & confidant of Popes Leo, Pius & Card Raphael) was a freemason. I doubt he was legally elected. It is the Freemason Franz- Joseph that tries to 'veto' Rampolla

Possibly blasphemous is a little to strong of a term-- nearly blasphemous is probably more accurate.

The word "Blasphemy" is used in regard to words or speech directed against God, not "Cardinals".

and lacking in charity to accuse the Emperor of being a Freemason WITHOUT PROOF.

Part of the 'proof' is that Franz- Jseph was a freemason is that he attempted to 'veto' the election of Rampolla.

Not so convinced that Feeney had an enemy in Pius XII, but likely, someone in Curia pullingsome strings and/or filling P12 with false info.......perhaps....or not....

Why are U referring to Pius XII as 'P12'?

All take note that the posts of Belloc continue to be the sloppyist in the Forum.

Quote from: Belloc

...., but likely, someone in Curia pullingsome strings and/or filling P12 with false info.......perhaps....or not....

Very likely, since several contemporaries had noted that ++Bea, of sketchy repute, had the popes' ear and also exerted considerable control over who else got access to him.

well put and highly likely

Roscoe, maybe I am sloppy, I have one ignore, you have 6 and your posting, both in my long absence and return and prior, all are asinine in themselves and I think many have "taken note" of that and your bizarre attachment to explaining SV and your sinful attachement to the Dutchie  :smoke-pot: :smoke-pot: :smoke-pot:

your assinine: "Part of the 'proof' is that Franz- Jseph was a freemason is that he attempted to 'veto' the election of Rampolla. "

and thats proof to a pot head? Rampolla gets off scott free, the Emperor is at fault? that is resutl of long yrs of  :smoke-pot: ??? many have written on liberalism of Rampolla and likely Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, that gets thrown under the bus?

also, sloppy? Joseph is the correct spelling, not Jseph.....

ok, then, will not abbreviate.....His Holiness, Pope Pius XII, Vicar of CHrist,...any other titles I should use everytime I post on him or any Pope????

thankfully, normally have you on hide, amost useful tool for the keeping of calm....

Quote from: roscoe

All take note that the posts of Belloc continue to be the sloppyist in the Forum.

LOL, you can't even spell "sloppiest".

Get away from that pot and maybe your posts won't be so sloppy, roscoe.

Truth...I type fast and have a job.....hence, some quick posts or thoughts and everyone knows that I cant spell when typing.......i hate the clicking of the mouse and keyboard.....very grating....so......

again, I have one ignore going into this competition, he has 6......someone is "taking note" of something........