Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: Other Evidence of Compromise Change Contradiction in the SSPX  (Read 1439 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 22779
  • Reputation: +19954/-204
  • Gender: Male
Other Evidence of Compromise Change Contradiction in the SSPX
« on: February 21, 2019, 07:57:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This SSPX Resistance resource -- a thread listing all the changes in the SSPX or neo-SSPX over the past several years is not for discussion or comment.

    This is the thread for the general membership to post their documented Compromises, Changes, and/or Contradictions in the new SSPX.

    Only documented changes, contradictions, and compromises coming out of the SSPX are allowed in this thread. If you have no evidence, e-mails, letters, screenshots, photos, videos, PDFs, or websites to refer to (perhaps you had a personal experience but no documentation) you can post it to this thread instead:

    https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-chapels/anecdotal-first-hand-evidence-supporting-sspx-resistance/
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 22779
    • Reputation: +19954/-204
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Other Evidence of Compromise Change Contradiction in the SSPX
    « Reply #1 on: February 22, 2019, 09:06:06 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • In a May 2003 interview with La Nef, Bishop Rifan spoke of the Apostolic Administration's relations with the Society of St Pius X as follows:

    From Wikipedia:
    Quote
    We have tried to be as friendly as possible with the SSPX and its superiors, but after we had informed them that we had serious reasons for continuing our contacts with Rome, which they did not intend to keep up, they began to criticize us severely, attempting also to dishonour us by putting in doubt our intentions and trying to create divisions among our faithful. After our recognition by the Holy See, the SSPX leadership removed our name from the lists of traditional Masses and began to foster Masses in the areas where we celebrate. Does that mean that the traditional Mass is good only when it is cut off from the Hierarchy? But thank God our faithful distinguish between love for the traditional Mass from the evil attitude that makes the traditional Mass a banner to wave against the Hierarchy.[5]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernando_Ar%C3%AAas_Rifan

    The Society of St Pius X and other traditionalist groups have reproached Bishop Rifan for concelebrating Mass according to the revised rite on 28 May 2011.[6] Bishop Rifan has stated in the past that he accepts the validity of the Mass celebrated according to the present rite used by the majority of priests of the Latin Rite, and denied allegation that he celebrated it before the video circulated from 28 May 2011.


    It wouldn't take much searching to find words of +Fellay post-2012 saying the exact same thing about the Resistance...
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 22779
    • Reputation: +19954/-204
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Other Evidence of Compromise Change Contradiction in the SSPX
    « Reply #2 on: February 22, 2019, 09:16:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There is no new policy posted on their website https://www.stdennis.ca/sjb-welcome
    Go to the bottom of their Governance page https://www.stdennis.ca/sjb-governance
    click on their 3 year plan
    read page 12 - respects diversity and promotes inclusion
    page 15 shows the $479,000.00 government funding.

    In this article https://globalnews.ca/news/4662671/eggen-gsas-gay-straight-alliances-alberta-schools-funding/  it is explained no money without compliance to the GSA policy, also the policy must be on their website. 28 schools are not in compliance to posting the policy. There are no Catholic schools on the list.

    Where is the changed policy?

    One comment by an SSPX faithful is "Did Fr C. know what he was signing?"
    The SSPX faithful who asked that should have read the policy and maybe their eyes would have been opened.
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 22779
    • Reputation: +19954/-204
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Other Evidence of Compromise Change Contradiction in the SSPX
    « Reply #3 on: February 23, 2019, 08:20:23 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • The new SSPX chapel in Madrid, Spain.


    Quote
    Below is a picture of the altar after having been dedicated. This, obviously, appears to be anything but Traditional Catholic. Notice the short hair of the 'Virgin' with no veil. Notice that the 'crucifix' lacks the INRI inscription and the lack of Blood on the figure. It certainly has the neo-Pagan, modernist signature all over it. It's hard to imagine what the superiors were thinking.
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline St Paul

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 151
    • Reputation: +143/-51
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Other Evidence of Compromise Change Contradiction in the SSPX
    « Reply #4 on: February 23, 2019, 09:49:36 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • http://nonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.com/p/special-report-expulsion-of-bishop.html?m=1



    The Von Gutmann family, Krah and Ankershofen


    As reported in previous posts, the Society received a substantial inheritance from Mrs. Rosa Von Gutmann, approximately 90 million euros.  This money comes from the steel businesses associated with Rothschild.  Bishop Fellay, in an effort to control the wealth, advised by God only knows, decided to remove the rightful holders (Father Michael Weigl, Ewald Stadler, Maria Schöffmann-Schlossstein) of the inheritance and put two characters who we have seen, have highly dubious connections with Jews (Krah) and eminent members of the Vatican Freemasonry (Ankershofen). In the words of Maximilian Krah in his interview to The Remnant, he was chosen by the Gutmann family.

    The political family of Ankershofen was the founder of and has been a part of Pro Oriente, and this pro-ecumenical foundation and faithful follower of the masonic religious freedom of Vatican II has Cardinal Schonborn as its current president, who is a close friend of the political family of Mr. Ankershofen. The founder of Pro Oriente was Cardinal Konig (an ally of Casaroli), its guardians are Kasper and Willibrand ... They are all interrelated in their work in favor of ecumenism and the Jews.

    In the Catholic Herald (later taken down but reported on here in the L'Osservatore Romano) of June 18, 1965, Cardinal Konig speaks about the Pro Oriente Foundation saying: “Its main purpose is a deeper understanding between the Catholic and Orthodox churches, and it is a subsidiary of the Secretariat for Promoting Christian Unity of Cardinal Bea (yes, the same who, along with Jules Isaac, is responsible for Nostra Aetate!)”


    Offline St Paul

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 151
    • Reputation: +143/-51
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Other Evidence of Compromise Change Contradiction in the SSPX
    « Reply #5 on: February 23, 2019, 09:53:54 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2015/06/a-catholic-working-for-hasbara.html?m=1

    Sunday, June 28, 2015
    A Catholic working for Hasbara?

    Click on the screenshot below.  Max is a member of the Facebook group: Israeli Hasbara. Unbelievable!?  We were assured by Robert Siscoe in his Remnant Newspaper interview with Krah titled,  Krahgate  An Interview with Maximilian Krah, that he was an upstanding Catholic!  People who asserted Krah was a Zionist or even a Mossad agent were pushed aside as nonsensical by Siscoe in the interview.

    [color][size][font][size]

    What is Hasbara?

    Glad, you asked.  

    Click on the screenshot below to see the explanation on the Israeli Hasbara's facebook page, the group Max is a member of.

    [/size][/font][/size][/color]
    [color][size][font][size]


    Hasbara, according to the Jerusalem Post article Hasbara, public diplomacy and propaganda, is the polite term used by Israelis for 'propoganda',

    [/size][/font][/size][/color]
    Quote
    Hasbara is Israel’s main “soft-power” tool, aimed primarily at external audiences, unlike the negatively perceived “propaganda,” which is directly internally. It is the bad guys who engage in propaganda, promoting their goals and narratives by fabricating facts, manipulating the media and deceiving everyone into thinking that they are the good guys. Hasbara is what we - the good guys - do, in order to explain how good we really are, and expose how bad the bad guys are.

    For instance, explaining that Jews have been living in the Holy Land for 3,000 years and have a right to their ancient homeland – this is hasbara, but when Palestinians say that the Jews are foreigners and the Temple never existed – this is propaganda.  
    [color][size][font][size]

    Let's recap, Krah:
    [/size][/font][/size][/color]





    [color][size][font][size]

    Don't worry though, the Remnant Newspaper as well as Bp. Fellay assured us that Krah is a - O.K. ![/size][/font][/size][/color]

    Offline St Paul

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 151
    • Reputation: +143/-51
    • Gender: Male

    Offline St Paul

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 151
    • Reputation: +143/-51
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Other Evidence of Compromise Change Contradiction in the SSPX
    « Reply #7 on: February 23, 2019, 10:06:48 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1

  • A Novus Ordo diocesan priest oversees the exchange of vows
    while the SSPX priest stands to the side and watches.




    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 22779
    • Reputation: +19954/-204
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Other Evidence of Compromise Change Contradiction in the SSPX
    « Reply #9 on: February 23, 2019, 11:04:40 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 22779
    • Reputation: +19954/-204
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Other Evidence of Compromise Change Contradiction in the SSPX
    « Reply #10 on: March 07, 2019, 05:35:40 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Women wear the pants at the SSPX

    Signs of decadence: Not a single woman in a dress. This could be FSSP headquarters, an Indult group, or even a Novus Ordo parish office.
    They are "conservatively dressed" by modern standards, yes. By modern standards.

    https://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/another-look-inside-operations-regina-coeli-house-assistant-priests-staff-45732 
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!


    Offline hollingsworth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2328
    • Reputation: +2542/-281
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Other Evidence of Compromise Change Contradiction in the SSPX
    « Reply #11 on: March 08, 2019, 04:15:01 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I keep inserting X's new items in my X-file, including yesterday's brief synopsis of Fr. Bouchacort by Matthew.  All are quite useful, I feel, and help to reconstruct the history of the +Fellay-run SSPX.  Only two of X's contributions, viz. #47 and #48, I left out, feeling that these articles are not very useful or probative of much.

    Offline Luis

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 3
    • Reputation: +4/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Other Evidence of Compromise Change Contradiction in the SSPX
    « Reply #12 on: March 13, 2019, 02:21:24 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Women wear the pants at the SSPX

    Signs of decadence: Not a single woman in a dress. This could be FSSP headquarters, an Indult group, or even a Novus Ordo parish office.
    They are "conservatively dressed" by modern standards, yes. By modern standards.

    https://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/another-look-inside-operations-regina-coeli-house-assistant-priests-staff-45732

    It seems something was cut ! Check https://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/another-look-inside-operations-regina-coeli-house-assistant-priests-staff-45732

    Offline Luis

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 3
    • Reputation: +4/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Other Evidence of Compromise Change Contradiction in the SSPX
    « Reply #13 on: March 13, 2019, 02:27:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Red handed :


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 22779
    • Reputation: +19954/-204
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Other Evidence of Compromise Change Contradiction in the SSPX
    « Reply #14 on: March 13, 2019, 07:20:24 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes, they HAPPENED TO CHANGE the picture, only days after the picture was made public on CathInfo.

    Oh and the picture JUST HAPPENS to hide the fact that all their women wear pants!

    CAUGHT RED HANDED with their hand in the cookie jar!

    CathInfo 1  
    SSPX 0

    Here is the new picture.

    NOTE: This thread is not for discussion or reactions. I created a new thread to discuss this event.
    https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/sspx-memory-holes-pic-of-district-office-women-in-pants/
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16