Mea Culpa observes an important and relevant data point in this deplorable
history: Fr. Schmidberger writes here attempting to bring opprobrium onto
the Carmel -
accusing cloistered traditional sisters of having "bathed
themselves in virtue, while pride and self-righteousness have ensnared
their hearts long ago?" -- WHAT??? -- "stubbornness, self-righteousness,
condescension, criticism, false dialectic, mockery and malice?" -- of being
"an enemy of God?" -- of having had a "downfall" by way of "well-known
weaknesses or pride of its own virtues, and due to "seduction sub specie
boni – under the disguise of good?" -- of having committed "the highest
injustice?" ????????How does he expect anyone to take him seriously????
He should be lucky he doesn't live in the middle ages, when you could get
your tongue cut out for talking like that about holy cloistered nuns!!
PostQuoting Fr. Schmidberger (below)......This seems to be a perfect description of Bp. Fellay and what he's actually doing to the SSPX!!!!
"This separation should remind us all of the warnings of the great Apostle Paul: "He that thinketh himself to stand, let him take heed lest he fall." (1 Cor 10:12). He does not 'say he who stands', but 'he who thinks that he stands', precisely because many souls believe themselves in safety; they bathe themselves in virtue, while pride and self-righteousness have ensnared their hearts long ago. Stubbornness, self-righteousness, condescension, criticism, false dialectic, mockery and malice are not the gifts of the Holy Ghost, but characteristics of the adversary of God. It does not matter to him whether he causes the downfall of a soul through its well-known weaknesses, or through its pride of its own virtues. Too often the devil turns into an angel of light and performs his work of seduction sub specie boni – under the disguise of good. If one carries one’s own right too far, for example, the highest injustice can be done."
I'd like to point out that the first time I read this the last paragraph made me
sick and I couldn't think about it. So thank you, Mea Culpa for bringing it to
my attention with your large type, italics and bold post. Otherwise I would
have missed it. It was THAT BAD.
One can only wonder - here he is attempting to besmirch the reputation of a
cloister of nuns (shudder!) while his words only serve to exemplify and well
describe the very machinations of his own and those of his boss, +Fellay --
the Menzingen-denizen rap sheet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From
the article on p. 6:
Secondly, the external sister left the Carmel on 28th February. (An external sister is a Carmelite nun who does not live enclosed and who performs external duties e.g: shopping runs). The external sister from Brilon-Wald had only recently solemnly professed her three religious vows to the Carmel St. Joseph on the Feast of St. Joseph 2012.
She, however, did not want to know anything about the happenings in the SSPX and refused to take note of any information. Therefore, she was not by any means ready to follow the step of her community. Here we find out what happens to someone when they hide their head in the
sand like an ostrich. The external sister "refused to take note of any
information."
How many are there about town doing just this. "Consider the source" one
prominent Jew used to say. When you know who it is that wrote something,
then you can know when to ignore it, basically. Maybe they're "nαzι." Maybe
they're "anti-semitic." Maybe they're part of the "resistance movement" --
shudder at the thought!
How terrible -- to be part of the "resistance movement!!"
This is an abiding theme that needs its own thread................................