Sorry to disappoint you, but I am definitely NOT Michael Voris.
The reception here to the story is very disappointing and a sad statement on Catholics.
It's very similar to how The Remnant Newspaper reacted to the Boston Globe's report on abuse in the Church in 2002. There was much weeping and gnashing of teeth and cries of "this is just a plot against the Church."
Yet, here we are nearly 20 years later and after all the individual state grand jury reports showing the stunning VOLUME of crimes by priests is not in dispute.
It seems like too many here are in some state of hysterical spiritual blindness. So what if it happened in your backyard, or at your favorite priestly society? Why does that make you unable to accept the facts? Don't you want the corruption out? Doesn't the truth matter? Because it seems like more people here care about shooting the messenger than giving careful consideration to the facts.
You turned up at the same time as the Voris story and have talked of little else. And you approach the subject in a very emotional way. It is not surprising that many of us speculate that you have some sort of personal connection.
But I am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps, because you are so new here, you simply do not understand what people here mean when they talk about Resistance. This is a position that the SSPX has gone astray from the original vision of Archbishop Lefebvre and therefore the current organization needs to be resisted. While this is not the only view on this forum, it is the position of the owner and a large proportion of its members.
Criticism of the SSPX is one of the major functions of this forum. Advertising for a book on the subject appears on a banner on the home page. People who blindly excuse any actions of the SSPX do not fit in well here and generally do not last long. It is highly unlikely that anyone writing on the subject here is motivated by uncritical loyalty to the SSPX.
As far as I can tell, everyone posting is in favour of careful consideration of the facts. One of the facts is that Michael Voris, for a variety of reasons, has limited credibility so we cannot just automatically accept his assertions as true.
I think it is fair to assume that everyone here wishes to uncover the truth and is strongly opposed to abuse and sɛҳuąƖ perversion. If you cannot understand this and assume this, then you are simply wasting your time by writing about this subject.
Topic: Michael Voris dissected (Read 8231 times)