acts contrary to the sixth commandment with a minor

Also important to note that the email stated Fr Moran was found guilty of:


This is vague, and could mean anything from assaulting a pre pubescent child to fornicating with a girl 17 years, 11 months, and 30 days old. The email references Canon law only when pronouncing his guilt.

So, is it not possible that while he was found guilty by the Church of "acts...with a minor", said minor was older than the age of consent..therefore no criminal trial by the state?

Basically, you cannot label him a "child abuser" or a "pedophile" based off of the information given

And to any visitors reading this..in case you get the wrong idea..if Fr Moran is only guilty of what I proposed above , he should still be blacklisted by Trad clergy and groups. I'm merely pointing out that no one has all the info required to call him a child abuser or pedophile

Yeah, let's draw the line here.  I don't care what he did in graphic detail.  Even absent any details, he poses a threat.  If he's capable of acting contrary to purity with minors (doesn't matter if they're "JUST" under 18) ... then he's a danger to children, since he can't control his impure impulses, even with youngsters.  It may be she was "17" now, but the next one might be 15, 13, 10?  This is good enough to definitely ban him from any "priestly ministry", as the Conciliars would phrase it.  Let's not actually start even implicitly condoning this filth.  Even the slightest hint of this and he needed to be jettisoned.

Archbishop Vigano stated that based on what he knew (and evidently he didn't now all the details either) ... that Moran should not be permitted to have anything to do with youngsters and that no one should be working with him.  He's 100% spot on.

Update from the UK. I have been told that a comment to this effect keeps getting taken down from BK's YouTube account --

Brendan K is keeping quiet and covering up that he was good friends with Bishop Richard Williamson to such an extent that the Bishop married him. There is a picture from the SSPX District magazine of about 12 or 13 years ago showing the Kavanaghs next to the Bishop, but I dont know how to include the jpeg image. There was also a picture of them with the Bishop after he had married them in another issue of that magazine,

It is believed that Brendan also introduced Bishop Williamson to David Irving, the historian. Brendan was invited to a party at David Iriving's house and took the Bishop as his guest. This shows how friendly they were and the Bishop was one of their first clerical visitors to see their chapel barn.

The picture with Bishop Williamson

We do know that Father Moran had been convicted in formal proceedings of some kind, and just because we haven't seen the evidence, that doesn't mean there isn't any.  I'm sure there is, even if we haven't seen it ... and since it appears to come from credible sources (the investigation, from +Vigano) ... there's no reason to deny its existence.  He'd be in the category of "credibly accused".  No one need prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the allegations are true as if in a criminal trial in order to sever any working relationship with him.  +Vigano indicated that the nature of the charges suggested that he be kept away from working with children ... and that really suffices.  Nobody has the authority to prosecute him, nor does Moran have some right to work with any particular Traditional organization.  Bishop Morgan could stop working with him just because he doesn't like the smell of his aftershave.