Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => SSPX Resistance News => Topic started by: RosarioYFusil on June 24, 2025, 02:45:45 PM
-
Private email sent to bishop … next day, parents arrested?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm8vbQ67SPk
-
Link from the comments: https://www.pressreader.com/ireland/belfast-telegraph/20250415/281556591665695 (https://www.pressreader.com/ireland/belfast-telegraph/20250415/281556591665695)
-
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8s_oOC_j4Ps.
-
:confused: Who or what is this? Where is this?
-
I watched the video. It looks like an introduction to another video on the same topic.
My questions:
1-Where is the location?
2-What is the real name of this "Father Fake". If we want to warn other families, we need the name of this Fake-Abuser "Priest".
3-We need the name of the bishop who supports that Fake Priest.
4-A copy of the official email received from the diocese would be good too.
5-What is the name of the man making the video?
(In the Post title, we have a lot of names. But nothing specific in the video).
6-Is this video legit?
7-Or is it of the same kind than those made by a lunatic Irish lady against the Carmelite Sisters and Bp Ballini's seminary? Or like those published at Broadstairs against Bp Williamson and Fr. Abraham?
I know fake priests and fake bishops like to take advantage of Traditional families. I recall the case of a guy who was chaplain at the Powers Lake school, after Fr. Nelson passed away. It was eventually found out he had 4 aliases and had been moving around the US offering his "services" to traditional groups. Turned out he was a convicted felon and embezzler.
Yes, we need to be careful, and people should not receive priests without a thorough background check.
That's why we need more specific details on this case.
-
1-Where is the second video?
2nd video is surveillance footage of the arrest.
-
I watched the video. It looks like an introduction to another video on the same topic.
My questions:
1-Where is the location?
2-What is the real name of this "Father Fake". If we want to warn other families, we need the name of this Fake-Abuser "Priest".
3-We need the name of the bishop who supports that Fake Priest.
4-A copy of the official email received from the diocese would be good too.
5-What is the name of the man making the video?
(In the Post title, we have a lot of names. But nothing specific in the video).
6-Is this video legit?
7-Or is it of the same kind than those made by a lunatic Irish lady against the Carmelite Sisters and Bp Ballini's seminary? Or like those published at Broadstairs against Bp Williamson and Fr. Abraham?
I know fake priests and fake bishops like to take advantage of Traditional families. I recall the case of a guy who was chaplain at the Powers Lake school, after Fr. Nelson passed away. It was eventually found out he had 4 aliases and had been moving around the US offering his "services" to traditional groups. Turned out he was a convicted felon and embezzler.
Yes, we need to be careful, and people should not receive priests without a thorough background check.
That's why we need more specific details on this case.
I post secon video above you
-
So this guy is in England and he has a private chapel. But he got a recommendation from the diocese? At least in America, private chapels and dioceses' don't mix. I know that most of England is Anglican and the Catholic population is small, but this still seems weird.
p.s. This guy is the famous piano player on youtube. Been watching him for years. Didn't realize he was a Trad. He's definitely believable. Whoever he got mixed up with was trying to scam him. I just don't understand how the diocese fits in with a private chapel on a farm.
-
So this guy is in England and he has a private chapel. But he got a recommendation from the diocese? At least in America, private chapels and dioceses' don't mix. I know that most of England is Anglican and the Catholic population is small, but this still seems weird.
p.s. This guy is the famous piano player on youtube. Been watching him for years. Didn't realize he was a Trad. He's definitely believable. Whoever he got mixed up with was trying to scam him. I just don't understand how the diocese fits in with a private chapel on a farm.
He say bad priest was recommended by bishop morgan resistance
-
2nd video is surveillance footage of the arrest.
Thanks. I guess the second video came as I was typing my first reply.
This is UK. And I thought California was bad!
UK is where they arrest you if you pray IN YOUR HEAD less than 200 feet away from an abortion clinic. And if you pray IN YOUR HOUSE if it is less than 200 feet away from such clinics!
UK is also where they cover up a Pakistani child grooming gang that abused 600 children.
BRITANNIA HAS BECOME INSANE!
-
He say bad priest was recommended by bishop morgan resistance
Which video did he say this?
-
Which video did he say this?
The video didn't give any names (possibly because he doesn't want another visit from the police?). The article he linked in the comments also doesn't give names, but does say SSPX Resistance and gives the location.
-
So this guy is in England and he has a private chapel. But he got a recommendation from the diocese? At least in America, private chapels and dioceses' don't mix.
No. The diocese in question is the one to which the man in the video asked about the fake priest. And the diocese replied to him that this fake priest was ordained there, but was later on defrocked because of sɛҳuąƖ abuse. I think the diocese is in the Caribbean Islands.
-
He must speak now. Silence is no holy.
How do you know who the priest is?
-
How do you know who the priest is
brendan friend robert nugent on youtube is decrevi he do video on this also archbishop vigano did warm bishops in an email
-
brendan friend robert nugent on youtube is decrevi he do video on this also archbishop vigano did warm bishops in an email
link?
-
What is your role in all this, Rosario?
You don't sound anything like the British bloke in the video. You sound Hispanic with very broken English.
But it sounds like this issue is a very personal one for the man in the video. How were you even affected by all this? Was the "Father Fake" in Mexico for a while or something?
-
I think it should perhaps now be custom that any priest with a credible accusation of abuse is forever suspended from saying mass publicly or can only do so alone. Otherwise, he can spend time in penance in a monastery. Zero, absolutely zero, second chances. One is a priest forever, but can not do what a good priest is otherwise entitled to do.
-
What is your role in all this, Rosario?
You don't sound anything like the British bloke in the video. You sound Hispanic with very broken English.
But it sounds like this issue is a very personal one for the man in the video. How were you even affected by all this? Was the "Father Fake" in Mexico for a while or something?
My role I am catholic and secrecy not from God also children at risk
-
OP's syntax seems a little odd for a non-native English speaker...almost like a native English speaker trying to appear foreign :popcorn:
Back to the topic, that guy has 2.5 million subs and the arrest video has 80k views in 5 hours. Not a good look for +Ballini and +Morgan if this is true, they shouldn't be having anything to do with priests like this. Repented, reformed or not it's just terrible optics
-
My role I am catholic and secrecy not from God also children at risk
You speak like a Brazilian ex-seminarian
-
OP's syntax seems a little odd for a non-native English speaker...almost like a native English speaker trying to appear foreign :popcorn:
Back to the topic, that guy has 2.5 million subs and the arrest video has 80k views in 5 hours. Not a good look for +Ballini and +Morgan if this is true, they shouldn't be having anything to do with priests like this. Repented, reformed or not it's just terrible optics
Si tú puedes escribir español… entonces ¿por qué el Obispo Morgan no dice nada de esto?
¿Por qué él recomendó a este padre?
-
OP's syntax seems a little odd for a non-native English speaker...almost like a native English speaker trying to appear foreign :popcorn:
Back to the topic, that guy has 2.5 million subs and the arrest video has 80k views in 5 hours. Not a good look for +Ballini and +Morgan if this is true, they shouldn't be having anything to do with priests like this. Repented, reformed or not it's just terrible optics
Decrevi have posted a video saying ballini hiding and many news articles from this in irish.. why can not they speak and set it strait
-
If I meet a "priest" and he will not even tell me who ordained him, he is not even stepping foot on my driveway.
-
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xAAvsscdJsw
Looks like B. Kavanagh...
Beautiful choral singing, due in part to the H U G E Chapel. Worth a listen. About 7 months ago...Priest was late.
-
This is one of the perils of having "isolated pockets of resistance" where there is no coordination or background details whatsoever about who's who. The irony of this is that Dr K had to contact another archdiocese to get information and was responded cordially with the required details.
-
What proof do we have that the priest in question actually exists?
What are we supposed to do about it? You're not even naming the priest.
-
Well, if Bishop Morgan is involved, that's a shame. You'd think he would know (from +Williamson) to stay away from ANY cleric who has spent time with Fr Pfeiffer.
Well, unfortunately, Bishop Williamson didn't always exercise great judgment in this department, as at one point he was hosting a priest who labored under credible allegations of predatory behavior ... after also having defended Urrutigoity tooth-and-nail.
-
What proof do we have that the priest in question actually exists?
What are we supposed to do about it? You're not even naming the priest.
I think he's looking for answers. What's going on? Why did Bishop Morgan recommend this priest? When he wrote the e-mail complaining about the priest, Bishop Morgan then blocked him? I think there's a question of trust here, where Bishop Morgan needs to be transparent about the entire thing.
-
I think he's looking for answers. What's going on? Why did Bishop Morgan recommend this priest? When he wrote the e-mail complaining about the priest, Bishop Morgan then blocked him? I think there's a question of trust here, where Bishop Morgan needs to be transparent about the entire thing.
From this link posted earlier https://www.pressreader.com/ireland/belfast-telegraph/20250415/281556591665695 it seems the predator was ordained deacon at the diocese of Fort-de-france (Martinique) and dismissed from the clerical state thereafter. From there, he moved to London, Cardiff, and now seems to be operating around Wales and Derry (Ireland). Thus he was never a priest in the first place. If he is presenting himself as a priest now, I would suspect this was because he was ordained by +Ballini, thus +Morgan could have relied on this information from +Ballini make the recommendation to Dr K? What a sad state of affairs that would be. I believe it would best for Dr K to reveal the details received from the diocese of Fort-de-france to clear this once and for all.
-
So he basically does public piano stuff like this guy (who seems to have even more views)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7tsqQ78CJk
-
I think he's looking for answers. What's going on? Why did Bishop Morgan recommend this priest? When he wrote the e-mail complaining about the priest, Bishop Morgan then blocked him? I think there's a question of trust here, where Bishop Morgan needs to be transparent about the entire thing.
I agree we need lots of clarity from all involved. We don't even know if the whole story is true, to begin with.
Let's try to take a step back: Now we have accusations against an un-named Priest (Fr. Fake), by an un-named guy who has shades glued to his face even at church, and whose goal in life seems to be filmed and posted. Look at him with the joined hands and shades in church. It looks completely staged. Who really prays like that and is being filmed like that?
We don't even know if he is a faithful of the Resistance. I mean, look at the video of the arrest: His wife is in leggings, and his daughters in pants. That reminds me more of Indult or Neo-SSPX faithful.
Is the whole operation a publicity stunt? Was there a more serious reason for the complaint lodged against him? Was the arrest really linked to Fr. Fake? Or was the arrest made for other reasons? If we knew the name of Mr. Shades, and the location of the police station where he was taken, we could get information from the police about the reasons for the arrest.
I think that if you are going to throw bombshell videos, you should make sure you come up with all details, so as to avoid confusion.
Look at all the replies to this topic They all come with questions and suppositions. We want names, locations, dates, etc. We want a DOSSIER, not a click-bait video by a guy with shades.
And this topic was posted by a guy who created his profile today, just to post his bombshell. He doesn't speak English, he throws a stinking bomb on the platform, with no real details or proof, and a lot of questions and suppositions. The one who should have posted is the main character, the Shades Video Guy.
I am sick of the whole thing.
-
You are free to post links to anything from the public record, public internet.
We are interested in facts here, not rumors, slander, or speculation.
-
I agree we need lots of clarity from all involved. We don't even know if the whole story is true, to begin with.
Let's try to take a step back: Now we have accusations against an un-named Priest (Fr. Fake), by an un-named guy who has shades glued to his face even at church, and whose goal in life seems to be filmed and posted. Look at him with the joined hands and shades in church. It looks completely staged. Who really prays like that and is being filmed like that?
We don't even know if he is a faithful of the Resistance. I mean, look at the video of the arrest: His wife is in leggings, and his daughters in pants. That reminds me more of Indult or Neo-SSPX faithful.
Is the whole operation a publicity stunt? Was there a more serious reason for the complaint lodged against him? Was the arrest really linked to Fr. Fake? Or was the arrest made for other reasons? If we knew the name of Mr. Shades, and the location of the police station where he was taken, we could get information from the police about the reasons for the arrest.
I think that if you are going to throw bombshell videos, you should make sure you come up with all details, so as to avoid confusion.
Look at all the replies to this topic They all come with questions and suppositions. We want names, locations, dates, etc. We want a DOSSIER, not a click-bait video by a guy with shades.
And this topic was posted by a guy who created his profile today, just to post his bombshell. He doesn't speak English, he throws a stinking bomb on the platform, with no real details or proof, and a lot of questions and suppositions. The one who should have posted is the main character, the Shades Video Guy.
I am sick of the whole thing.
From his past videos, Bishop Morgan and some Resistance-affiliated priests have celebrated Masses at Dr Kevanagh's stone barn chapel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX0i6il3aZw
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX0i6il3aZw)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZG0clp1NPQY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYq3hktxhGI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9m9vVnNqHrw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZG0clp1NPQY)
-
(https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=7152&pid=13523#pid13523)Who is Fr. Kerry Moran?
(This seems to be an Fr. Hewko aligned publication, and anti +Williamson)
Kerry Michael Moran is a priest of the Fake Resistance. Since mid-2024 he has said Mass and heard confessions in England for the Mass centres of Bishop Paul Morgan, staying intermittently at Broadstairs and has since then spent time in Ireland where he said Mass heard confessions for the Mass centres of Bishop Giacomo Ballini, though we are told that in Ireland he went by the name Ciaran Moran. He also stayed at the house in Cork where Ballini lives with his priests and seminarians. In March of this year, an old acquaintance drew our attention to this in early 2025 after he received this email in reply to an enquiry:
(https://i.postimg.cc/R0Tx4qsN/Screenshot-2025-05-19-081711.png)
Very little effort is required to ascertain that this email is 100% genuine. Note the fact that it was sent not from the priest’s personal email account, but from the email address belonging to the chancery of the diocese (www.eglisemartinique.fr) is the website of the conciliar church in Martinique, a colonial outpost of France situated near Barbados in the Caribbean. The title under his name, “Chancellier intérimaire” means that he is the chancellor of the diocese, but as a temporary, not yet permanent, appointment. “Interim Chancellor” we might say. The same diocese website also reveals that the interim chancellor of the diocese is one Fr. Benoit Paul-Joseph, priest of the Fraternity of St Peter. The above email is therefore not a random email from an unknown stranger intent on causing mischief. It is not even an email from Fr. Benoit-Joseph as an individual priest: it is an official response from the chancellor of a conciliar diocese in his capacity as chancellor of that diocese.
The next question is this: is it true that the priest Kerry Moran is originally from the diocese of Fort - de - France in Martinique? Is this diocese really in a position to know what they are talking about when they warn people about him? Again, a quick internet search is our friend.
“Among the visiting clergy were Fr Emmanuel Chaulvet and Deacon Kerry Moran who are based in Martinique.” says a Novus Ordo news article from May 2018, about ordinations in Port of Spain diocese, in Trinidad and Tobago (https://catholictt.org/2018/05/25/it-can-bedone/).
Another publicly visible article from February 2017 reads:
“Mgr. David Macaire, Archbishop of our diocese will this year make a pastoral visit to our district from Monday 8th to Wednesday 10th May 2017, and will meet with the leaders of various different groups and movements in the following order: […] 11. The Mass servers with the seminarian Kerry Moran, diocesan MC” ...(“Les servants de messe avec le séminariste Kerry Moran, cérémoniaire diocésain.” -original article in French, translation is ours - http://paroissedufrancois.fr/visite-demg...d-macaire/ ).
As before, this is a Novus Ordo news website from that part of the world, in this case from Martinique. So we can gather that he was a seminarian in early 2017 and a deacon by May 2017. Remember that the conciliar church don’t do minor orders: your status is “seminarian” and nothing else, right up until you become a deacon. These dates fit with what the chancellor of Fort de France diocese says, that he was ordained deacon for that diocese in August 2017.
On the website of the Latin Mass Society of England and Wales, we find a 2014 article which mentions him thus:
“Please pray for vocations, especially for the following young men of the Archdiocese… Pray for Matthew Palmer (FSSP), Royston Price, Kerry Moran who have entered the religious life…” (https://lmscardiff.org.uk/vocations_to_t...ious_life/)
Exactly what “religious life” he had entered in 2014 remains unclear, but we gather that he tried his vocation a number of different places before ending up in Martinique. And come to think of it, what is a white guy from Wales doing in a black Caribbean French-speaking diocese? Not a crime, of course, and there might be a perfectly innocent explanation. But it does require an explanation, it isn’t normal. And was he eventually ordained a priest by that diocese or only deacon, in which case who ordained him a priest? One version we have heard is that it was Archbishop Vigano who ordained him to the priesthood. He himself, it seems, has been telling people that Bishop Williamson conditionally ordained him to the priesthood. So who knows what the truth is, there seem to be at least three possibilities there.
We gather that Fr. Moran is now telling people that his former diocese are persecuting him because he was too Traditional for them, or something similar. This doesn’t ring true somehow. Apart from being a suspiciously convenient excuse, the chancellor of the diocese happens to be a priest of the Fraternity of St Peter. And anyway, if Moran had always been so Traditional, so Traditional that his own diocese fabricated a very serious charge against him, why would he have chosen a Novus Ordo diocese in which to be a seminarian in the first place? Besides, say what you will about conciliar dioceses, surely they don’t go about inventing charges of child sɛҳuąƖ abuse where none exist; they take that sort of thing seriously and are under a lot of pressure to be seen to do so, especially in recent years.
Either way, our correspondents of the diocese of Fort-de-France were also in touch with Archbishop Vigano and received this reply from him:
(https://i.postimg.cc/2SZBcNHH/Screenshot-2025-05-19-082254.png)
Fr. Moran’s response to this, we are told, has been to accuse Archbishop Vigano of having it in for him. How convenient. His old conciliar diocese who ordained him deacon and the ‘Traditional’ bishop who he says ordained him priest, both somehow have ended up with a grudge against him, one so serious that they have decided to collude in the same fabricated story against him - does that sound plausible?
It is also important to note that Vigano says he informed Bishop Ballini. Why Ballini for his part decided to ignore the warning is anyone’s guess. Several people have tried to reach him in recent weeks, but he appeared to have gone off to Italy. Our correspondents sent both emails to Bishop Morgan, whom they had known since his SSPX days, and his response was to block them. It is also useful to note that if there is a distinct lack of evidence from the other side, i.e. from the Fake Resistance, that is because of their usual habit of “being discreet” following the advice of Bishop Williamson.
This means that very little is publicly verifiable. Unfortunately, it also means that it creates an atmosphere in which pederasts and child sɛҳuąƖ abusers can breathe a little more easily: such people are often consummate liars and not beyond reinventing themselves to outrun their own notorious reputations, and it is usually only by open communication that they are eventually brought to book.
(https://i.postimg.cc/xdb8jGrt/Screenshot-2025-05-19-082639.png)
Fr. Kerry Moran certainly appears very keen to be ‘discreet’. Evidence abounds of how anxious he is not to have his name or even his picture out in public - he is not at all happy about it! Some might say that this is in itself suspicious. His stories to various people about how he is a top-level expert canon lawyer and that he is currently fighting cases in Rome to defend various unnamed Traditionalists also ring hollow to many. To others, he has said that it is himself that he is defending and that once his name gets out in connection with the ‘Resistance’ (by which he presumably means the Fake Resistance), it will ruin his chances of a fair trial. Again, it all rings a little hollow.
And of course, it is impossible to contact the man himself because - you’ve guessed it - everything is top secret, the whole apostolate has to operate behind closed doors, there is no public point of contact anywhere that we can see.
Why Does it Matter?
Bishops Morgan and Ballini refuse to take any responsibility for the man they introduced to their own faithful. Even the laity, some of them it seems, are intent on defending this man, just as some of them have (we are reliably informed) taken in recent years to telling people that Fr. Stephen Abraham is totally innocent and never did anything. Incredible but true. Let us just take a moment to ponder what it must take to produce such a head-in-the-sand response. The mind boggles.
(https://i.postimg.cc/DyL8KPT6/Screenshot-2025-05-19-082811.png)
It is tempting to hope that the stubbornness, blindness and unwillingness to face facts or take responsibility may be the undoing of the Fake Resistance. But let us be realistic: the secular world around us will not make any distinction between us and them, and we will end up being tarred with the same brush. In the meantime, this may not be the last we have heard of the matter. Stay tuned…
-
The SSPX routinely apply 1983 Canon Law to their 'problematic' priests. The resistance applies the 1917 code (one would assume)
https://catholicconfidential.substack.com/p/lawsuit-shows-sspx-obedience-to-1983 (https://catholicconfidential.substack.com/p/lawsuit-shows-sspx-obedience-to-1983)
The article suggests that the SSPX applys the law assuming that the that the pedophile is a victim of his impulses.
(https://i.imgur.com/LNUyI1O.png)
It seems unlikely that a resistance priest would refuse to reveal who ordained him. There are women in trousers at these barn masses so it's another red flag that this isn't a resistance mass
-
Why would Resistance bishops/priests associate with this guy to begin with? Do they just offer mass for anyone who asks? Again, this guy has 2.5 million subscribers on YouTube, basically a public figure with a large online presence. They couldn't have done a little research to find out more about him?
So, terrible optics on both fronts. They shouldn't have had anything to do with the fornicator priest, and they shouldn't have had anything to do with this piano guy
White marker indicates bare skin
(https://i.imgur.com/0Y0jetn.jpeg)
(https://i.imgur.com/jgKrRBM.jpeg)
(https://i.imgur.com/bwf5nxi.jpeg)
(https://i.imgur.com/ScA0Sjz.jpeg)
-
Ugh!
Those photos... it really makes you wonder about that guy. That's a huge understatement though.
Isn't he married? Why is he flirting and cavorting with women like that? Those are single moment snapshots. What happened minutes before and after those snapshots? We're not talking about a man taking a simple photo standing next to a woman wearing typical modern attire, such as shorts or pants. No, nothing that banal.
Having a woman do the splits on your piano? Holding grossly immodestly dressed women close? That one woman has her leg overlapping on him, and look at how much paint had to be applied to make the image non-pornographic!
Is one of those women his wife? They all can't be! But even if they were, it's grossly immodest and promoting indecency. It is not lawful for a Catholic to use sex (in ANY form, even subtle suggestion or titillation) to promote their brand, business, etc.
Not to mention the "Pablo" vibes with the sunglasses.
This man needs to look into Catholic morality. Does he even know what an occasion of sin is? Does he know that leading others into sin is ITSELF a sin?
This man wants to be a rock star, complete with the "sex" component of that lifestyle. That seems to be a bigger priority for him than being a good (Traditional) Catholic.
-
My questions:
1-Where is the location?
2-What is the real name of this "Father Fake". If we want to warn other families, we need the name..."
I know fake priests and fake bishops like to take advantage of Traditional families. I recall the case of a guy who was chaplain at the Powers Lake school, after Fr. Nelson passed away. It was eventually found out he had 4 aliases and had been moving around the US offering his "services" to traditional groups. Turned out he was a convicted felon and embezzler.
Yes, we need to be careful,
This is remarkable! About that Powers Lake situation, I wanted to join a religious community and had known about Fr. Nelson since about 1974 . Anyway I called that "priest" and I was planning to join him. On the phone call he was a smooth, erudite and full of confidence, like, very lucid and genuine. So I told my priest in Canada about my plans, but within 2 days SSPX announced that he was a complete fraud!!!Yet he was saying mass for those nuns and faithful at Powers Lake. So it is difficult to trace these criminals, as they are very intelligent, and as + Vigano says...insidious. Too bad Bishop Vigano got deceived and ordained him! The bright side about this Dr. K. incident is that today we know the name, 95% certainty, of this charlatan cleric "Fr." Kerry Moran. ***
Dr. Brendan K. could probably use a 30 day Ignatian retreat, no?
-
Ugh!
Those photos... it really makes you wonder about that guy. That's a huge understatement though.
Isn't he married? Why is he flirting and cavorting with women like that? Those are single moment snapshots. What happened minutes before and after those snapshots? We're not talking about a man taking a simple photo standing next to a woman wearing typical modern attire, such as shorts or pants. No, nothing that banal.
Having a woman do the splits on your piano? Holding grossly immodestly dressed women close? That one woman has her leg overlapping on him, and look at how much paint had to be applied to make the image non-pornographic!
Not to mention the "Pablo" vibes with the sunglasses.
This man needs to look into Catholic morality. Does he even know what an occasion of sin is?
Yeah, and that paint was not applied liberally either! 1:1 ratio paint to skin :facepalm:
Videos (warning: they are immodest)
https://youtube.com/shorts/n_op08g-K0I
(https://youtube.com/shorts/n_op08g-K0I)https://youtube.com/shorts/Mixxy8GQhb4
(https://youtube.com/shorts/Mixxy8GQhb4)https://youtube.com/shorts/8gg2TNZwBnQ
(https://youtube.com/shorts/8gg2TNZwBnQ)https://youtube.com/shorts/r3Flf41Bck0
(https://youtube.com/shorts/r3Flf41Bck0)https://youtube.com/shorts/9jXTs6T1V5E
(https://youtube.com/shorts/9jXTs6T1V5E)
So now, because the Resistance bishops in England/Ireland have (for whatever reason) not cut ties with Moran, and apparently did not do a lick of research regarding this piano guy, you not only have non-Catholics and Novus Ordoites given more ammo against Trad clergy regarding sex abuse/child predation/immortality..people are also now speculating that the Bishop (Either +Bellini or +Morgan) was colluding with the government/police to set the piano guy up because he is vocally anti-CCP, pro-free speech, anti-police state.
This all could have been avoided by saying NO to this guy's request for mass, and giving Fr. Moran the boot. What is going on over there??
-
My philosophy:
Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
I don't know what's going on, but the more light is shed on the issue the better.
-
Excerpt from StoneWallCatholic
My questions:
1-Where is the location?
2-What is the real name of this "Father Fake". If we want to warn other families, we need the name..."
*****
On Facebook Ireland Resistance, 3 months ago, post about + Ballini re: Kerry Michael Moran.
I can't read the comments as I don't have FBook account. See attached Screenshot.
-
How must we contact this bishop to ask
-
This is remarkable! About that Powers Lake situation, I wanted to join a religious community and had known about Fr. Nelson since about 1974 . Anyway I called that "priest" and I was planning to join him. On the phone call he was a smooth, erudite and full of confidence, like, very lucid and genuine. So I told my priest in Canada about my plans, but within 2 days SSPX announced that he was a complete fraud!!!Yet he was saying mass for those nuns and faithful at Powers Lake. So it is difficult to trace these criminals, as they are very intelligent, and as + Vigano says...insidious. Too bad Bishop Vigano got deceived and ordained him! The bright side about this Dr. K. incident is that today we know the name, 95% certainty, of this charlatan cleric "Fr." Kerry Moran. ***
Dr. Brendan K. could probably use a 30 day Ignatian retreat, no?
How do you know vigano ordaine
-
Excerpt from StoneWallCatholic
My questions:
1-Where is the location?
2-What is the real name of this "Father Fake". If we want to warn other families, we need the name..."
*****
On Facebook Ireland Resistance, 3 months ago, post about + Ballini re: Kerry Michael Moran.
I can't read the comments as I don't have FBook account. See attached Screenshot.
That is just a comment under the post asking about the Moran situation, which no one responded to. I don't believe +Ballini acknowledged questions about Moran in his response to the NO bishop
-
Let me get this straight --
(3) different Conciliar dioceses reported problems with this priest?
That's not a conspiracy by Piano Man, someone with a grudge, etc.
Besides, why would the Novus Ordo *make up* another sex abuse scandal? Aren't they black & blue from this issue already (from the past 25 years)? Why would they severely damage themselves, just to damage some man's reputation? That doesn't even make sense. Also, they would be responsible for *making* him as well as casting him out, since he was with them for 10 years.
Any satisfying explanation (exonerating this priest) would have to answer that question: why would several distinct Dioceses report the same problem with a man? Why would they lie about this? So much smoke, but no fire at all, huh?
Also: from the Conciliar Church point of view, SSPX/True resistance/Fake resistance/Pfeifferville/Fr. Hewko = all the same thing to them. They're not going to "pick a side" in the fight within Tradition.
I'm not buying it.
And "They persecute me because I'm so traditional" is the oldest excuse in the book. Everyone uses it. You could have a legitimate rap sheet of crimes, and come sobbing to some Traditional Bishop, "Oh, they are just making up lies about me to destroy my reputation. I am persecuted for the truth, because I'm Traditional!" and a percentage of Trad bishops would buy it -- especially if they were desperate for priests (helpers, market share, income, influence, etc.)
That excuse is as old as the hills.
I'm going to keep an open mind about this. But I'm not going to let my brain slide out and plop onto the floor, either.
-
Let me get this straight --
(3) different Conciliar dioceses reported problems with this priest?
That's not a conspiracy by Piano Man, someone with a grudge, etc.
Besides, why would the Novus Ordo *make up* another sex abuse scandal? Aren't they black & blue from this issue already (from the past 25 years)? Why would they severely damage themselves, just to damage some man's reputation? That doesn't even make sense. Also, they would be responsible for *making* him as well as casting him out, since he was with them for 10 years.
Also: from the Conciliar Church point of view, SSPX/True resistance/Fake resistance/Pfeifferville/Fr. Hewko = all the same thing to them. They're not going to "pick a side" in the fight within Tradition.
I'm not buying it.
Maybe we can all agree... this thing stink, no?
-
And "They persecute me because I'm so traditional" is the oldest excuse in the book. Everyone uses it. You could have a legitimate rap sheet of crimes, and come sobbing to some Traditional Bishop, "Oh, they are just making up lies about me to destroy my reputation. I am persecuted for the truth, because I'm Traditional!" and a percentage of Trad bishops would buy it -- especially if they were desperate for priests (which would mean for them: more helpers, easier life, more market share, income, influence, power, etc.)
That excuse is as old as the hills.
Yes, you might be Traditional, but that doesn't mean you can't commit crimes, or that every punishment you receive is BECAUSE you are Traditional.
P.S. Another thought to keep in mind:
God often uses imperfect, sometimes downright evil, instruments to work His holy will.
Pontius Pilate insisted on the placard, "Jesus Christ, King of the Jews". That was God's will. (although Pilate probably went to hell)
-
And "They persecute me because I'm so traditional" is the oldest excuse in the book. Everyone uses it. You could have a legitimate rap sheet of crimes, and come sobbing to some Traditional Bishop, "Oh, they are just making up lies about me to destroy my reputation. I am persecuted for the truth, because I'm Traditional!" and a percentage of Trad bishops would buy it -- especially if they were desperate for priests (which would mean for them: more helpers, easier life, more market share, income, influence, power, etc.)
That excuse is as old as the hills.
Yes, you might be Traditional, but that doesn't mean you can't commit crimes, or that every punishment you receive is BECAUSE you are Traditional.
Yes If Brendan sending private email, Bishop know so why wall up and no talk?
-
Yes If Brendan sending private email, Bishop know so why wall up and no talk?
I mean not
-
Maybe we can all agree... this thing stink, no?
For the record, I think you are bogus too, "Rosario", with your lame attempt at a Spanish accent. Or should I call you by your other names?
TheNewVendee
coeurvoil
LeeAnnepraystherosary
Because you all have the same IP address.
But as I said above: the instrument being "shady", sinful, or imperfect does NOT automatically disprove what they are trying to promote. Basic logic.
-
And "They persecute me because I'm so traditional" is the oldest excuse in the book. Everyone uses it. You could have a legitimate rap sheet of crimes, and come sobbing to some Traditional Bishop, "Oh, they are just making up lies about me to destroy my reputation. I am persecuted for the truth, because I'm Traditional!" and a percentage of Trad bishops would buy it -- especially if they were desperate for priests (helpers, market share, income, influence, etc.)
Yep. Many of the predators use this tactic. Urrutigoity ... claimed he was just being slandered, persecuted for his opposition to sedevacantism. There were others at STAS who claimed they had been kicked out of other places for being "too Traditional" ... but later the truth sometimes came out, where sometimes it were violations of purity, but in one case the seminarian failed a psychological exam that he claimed was rigged to disqualify conservative types (but after I got to know him, realized there may very well have been some valid findings there).
-
Yep. Many of the predators use this tactic. Urrutigoity ... claimed he was just being slandered, persecuted for his opposition to sedevacantism.
Even if you're against sedevacantism, you have to think that no priest would make up allegations of sodomitical predations over theological differences ... and thereby commit grave sin.
-
For the record, I think you are bogus too, "Rosario", with your lame attempt at a Spanish accent.
Yes, totally bogus accent.
And the Piano guy is totally believable. He's had a chapel for a while now and is kinda a famous person. No reason for him to lie. a) it hurts his reputation/job, b) hurts his ability to find priests to use his chapel.
The larger question is -- How did England's "harassment" laws get so extreme? You send a few emails and you go to jail? That's insane.
-
How do you know vigano ordaine
Sorry, I don't want to start a rumor, but the long post of WorldsAway mentions this:
"...
One version we have heard is that it was Archbishop Vigano who ordained him to the priesthood. He himself, it seems, has been telling people that Bishop Williamson conditionally ordained him to the priesthood. So who knows what the truth is, there seem to be at least three possibilities there. ..."
*****
So at this point of this important investigation, that is only a possibility. +Vigano admits he was deceived , so there was at the least some communication. ..even with +W.
Ps. You have many fiends that use you computer ¿
-
For the record, I think you are bogus too, "Rosario", with your lame attempt at a Spanish accent. Or should I call you by your other names?
TheNewVendee
coeurvoil
LeeAnnepraystherosary
Because you all have the same IP address.
But as I said above: the instrument being "shady", sinful, or imperfect does NOT automatically disprove what they are trying to promote. Basic logic.
Accent fake? Maybe. Arrests? Emails? Silence? That not fake, hermano.
-
Accent fake? Maybe. Arrests? Emails? Silence? That not fake, hermano.
That's essentially what I just said, ese
-
Yes, totally bogus accent.
And the Piano guy is totally believable. He's had a chapel for a while now and is kinda a famous person. No reason for him to lie. a) it hurts his reputation/job, b) hurts his ability to find priests to use his chapel.
The larger question is -- How did England's "harassment" laws get so extreme? You send a few emails and you go to jail? That's insane.
If you think about it - and say the theories are true - the pedophile priests have the same evil master as the liberal elites. Somewhere a demon opens his eyes and swoops in to support both. Well ... Windswept House etc. etc. The same vice ....