Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Man arrested for email  (Read 175012 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Angelus

  • Supporter
Re: Man arrested for email
« Reply #300 on: October 08, 2025, 01:42:50 PM »
Yes, I have gone thank you.  (See above.)  And the moderation here - by the way - is marginally as bad as the episcopal oversight!  Boom boom...

Liar! In your first post, you posed as a "mainstream" Catholic who was "open to all expressions of the traditional Catholic faith." But you actually worship Bergoglio and his Laudato Si form of Counterfeit Catholicism. And you write articles for one of the most liberal, pro-false-Rome online rags: Wherepeteris.com

You feigned concern for the UK "connections" of yours and especially Brendan Kavanauh. Who hired you for your infiltration efforts? Are you on the same payroll as Bore U?


Quote
I have a connection with the Polish Catholic community in Folkestone who attend the regular Polish Mass at Our Lady Help of Christians. I am also aware of an SSPX Resistance group of Polish Catholics in East Kent (centred in Broadstairs) and know some individuals.  All through my life since my father - God rest his Catholic soul - was in the RAF generation that saved England from the nαzιs I have appreciated the Polish RAF contribution in the turning point Battle of Britain in 1940.  Although I remain in the Catholic mainstream in the Southwark Archdiocese I am open to all expressions of traditional Catholic faith. My model is the Saxon Archbishop of Canterbury, Dunstan (d.988) and all in Kent know the legend of Dunstan grabbing the devil by the nose with his blacksmith's tongs in his forge!

The horrifying incident that the Kavanagh family experienced (i.e. being sent a priest by +Morgan of SSPX Resistance - a priest who was verifiably laicised in Martinique when a deacon, as shown in the Chancellor's emails from that diocese) was further compounded by +Morgan's response: to have the couple arrested over alleged "angry emails" by a convoy of three police cars, and handcuffed in front of their children.  A civil complaint against the police has now been launched.  What has not been launched is +Morgan's explanation.  Why did he respond to a safeguarding alert by having the complainants arrested?

Reading this thread, I am so heartened to read the responses of so many supporting Brendan Kavanagh (the arrested father of the family) who is now launching a civil action against the police.  When that action reaches the courts, the response of +Morgan to the family's correct safeguarding complaint will be the main focus, not the doctrinal niceties of this or that SSPX grouping, and the incense will hit the fan (to put it politely!)  The fact that +Morgan has made no public statement is disappointing.  I reach out to my fellow Catholics in the Polish community who are involved in SSPX Resistance, and I feel your pain.  Yopu have been disgracefully served by your bishop and deserve an explanation.

It is clear that the person at the centre of this horrible story was either ordained priest (after his Catholic dismissal) by +Morgan, or +Viganò, or +Ballini, so one of them needs to have the thuribles to own up!


Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Man arrested for email
« Reply #301 on: October 08, 2025, 01:45:29 PM »
but more interesting is the failure to address the child safeguarding issues.  You are complicit in the safeguarding failure when you deride the people who take it seriously.
1.  You 'beg the question' that there are issues.  Nothing has been proven.  An allegation isn't proof.
2.  Innocent until proven guilty -- at least that's an American concept of justice.  Maybe in Britain it's guilty, then innocent?  Sure seems that's your view.


Offline Angelus

  • Supporter
Re: Man arrested for email
« Reply #302 on: October 08, 2025, 01:51:55 PM »
1.  You 'beg the question' that there are issues.  Nothing has been proven.  An allegation isn't proof.
2.  Innocent until proven guilty -- at least that's an American concept of justice.  Maybe in Britain it's guilty, then innocent?  Sure seems that's your view.

Pax, to get an idea of who you are really talking to, see his writings:

https://wherepeteris.com/author/gareth-thomas-weaver/

https://equusasinus.net

Re: Man arrested for email
« Reply #303 on: October 08, 2025, 02:02:16 PM »
1.  You 'beg the question' that there are issues.  Nothing has been proven.  An allegation isn't proof.
2.  Innocent until proven guilty -- at least that's an American concept of justice.  Maybe in Britain it's guilty, then innocent?  Sure seems that's your view.
An allegation against a priest that's saying a public mass, is enough to warrant him being removed from the circuit, whilst investigations are ongoing. Yet there is no evidence of any investigation. 

Why is that so difficult to understand? 

Would you hire an alleged alcoholic to work in your bar? Of course not.  

Especially in trad circles where silence, cover ups, payoffs and transfers to new a chapel where no one knows the prior history, is the norm.


Saint Peter Damian, Brandano da Petroio and Savonarola had no problem speaking publicly and forcefully about the sɛҳuąƖ sins of men of the Church. That's what we need right now as canon law isn't cutting it. 

Re: Man arrested for email
« Reply #304 on: October 08, 2025, 02:04:41 PM »
Pax, to get an idea of who you are really talking to, see his writings:

https://wherepeteris.com/author/gareth-thomas-weaver/

https://equusasinus.net
Maybe one should question why a novos ordo Catholic is having to do the investigation that should have been done months ago in the Resistance.