Author Topic: Letter of Three SSPX Bishops to Bishop Fellay - PDF (Read 116136 times)

Cristian · « **Reply #110 on:** June 07, 2012, 08:05:59 PM »

Quote from: catherineofsiena

Thank you Cristian. That is depressing. I guess we will have more answers tomorrow.

You are welcome... yes, we will. I don´t think something will happen tomorrow though.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #111 on:** June 07, 2012, 08:15:14 PM »

If this is true the priests should refuse to agree and force these usurpers to call the police.

They are persecuting the Catholic Faith. With their Zionist henchman lawyer and their masonic collaborators, who write forewords for the books of men like Father Celier. It was the same when our Lord was seized in the Garden of Gethsemane.

Matthew · « **Reply #112 on:** June 07, 2012, 09:41:12 PM »

Well, if this is true, we'll know soon enough. If it's a complete made-up piece of nonsense, we should know that too in a couple days when no announcement is made. I guess we'll have to "wait and see" on this one...

Quote

We announced two months ago ... Everything was signed in March ...
the brotherhood is finished !

archbishop lefebvre's work is destroyed !

The fax was sent to all District Superiors:

The Brotherhood is changing its name!

The statutes are changed!

Everything was signed in March, and it took two months for property transfers.

The announcement will be made official tomorrow morning on the site The Latin Gate .

All priests who do not agree, will be excluded and driven away! We know nothing about the position of Bishops but inaction for two months (except for a letter of no effect) leads us to ask ourselves this question:

Why no serious response?

To prevent any reaction?

If we were informed of this treachery, is it conceivable that they also were not informed themselves!

Betrayal and apostasy are completed!

We entered the hour of darkness ... and the punishment will flock!

Clelia · « **Reply #113 on:** June 25, 2012, 05:34:43 PM »

Excellet, Matthew! (Not a brownie, either!!!)

:dancing-banana: :jumping2: :applause: :dancing: :alcohol: :nunchaku: :rahrah:

Himagain · « **Reply #114 on:** June 26, 2012, 11:12:18 AM »

Quote from: SJB

Quote
Let it be noted in passing that we did not look for a practical agreement. That is false. All we have done is not refuse a priori, as you ask us to do, to consider the Popes offer. For the common good of the Society, we would far prefer the present solution of the intermediary status quo but it is clear that Rome will put up with it no longer.

This is a very strange paragraph. IOW, it would be better, for the common good of the Society, to maintain the status quo, but we consider the offer because "is clear that Rome will put up with it no longer."

What does this mean, "it is clear that Rome will put up with it no longer?"

SJB,
That portion of Bishop Fellay's letter stuck out to me, too!
In fact I wondered if that wasn't what has prompted the SSPX's work with the Curia on this "reconciliation".
From the quote, particularly the Bolded portion, it looks like the Vatican in general and His Holiness in particular may have pressured the SSPX to come to the table now or face a serious censure, such as formal declaration of schism and/or excommunication.

If that's not what that quote means, I look forward to reading someone's more enlightened view.