CathInfo.com

Unfortunately, you have it exactly backwards: This plays perfectly into the hands of BXVI, Bishop Fellay, and Krah/Jews:

I think that Maurice had no right to publish the letter. But now it's too late.
Where this situation plays into, we'll have to see. God will have the last word, and I know Bishop Williamson is on HIS side.

They now have their excuse to axe Bishop WIlliamson (which was almost certainly the plan all along, since the Jews object to him, as does Rome).

Not the ostrich-like way please!

Menzingen tries to axe the good Bishop for about three years now. (And that's why, for example, Krah who works for Bp Fellay and other superiors could insult Bishop Williamson constantly.)

Bishop Fellay wrote in this letter that he "ordered" to stop the Eleison Comments several times. So Bishop Williamson had a good time to think in peace about continuing or discontinuing his graceful preaching. Could this be the reason for the nice new web-site www.dinoscopus.org which went online just a few weeks ago?  

Indeed nobody has the right to stop a good bishop from fulfilling his duty to preach and defend the Faith.
Unfortunately the double-thinking Bishop Fellay doesn't understand it because for several years he's not defending the whole faith anymore -- for example when he fawns upon the first and most vicious enemies of our Lord Jesus Christus, the anti-christian Jews, and propagates Vatican II untruths like "The Jews are our elder brothers" etc.

They couldn't care less about Bishop Williamson trotting off on his own with a marginal number of clergy (5 at most).

Newrome cares.

Unfortunately no majority of the SSPX priests support Bishop Williamson (which shows the bad state of the society). But you give a random shot by saing "5 at most". Or do you mean just the German-speaking zone? Because then you would be about right. :-)

This indiscretion by Bishop Williamson and Pinnay just pulled the last teeth out of the SSPX.

That's an unfair accusation against Bishop Williamson. Don't do it.

Let's wait and see what happens.

Ethelred:

I heard from a trustfully source that the letter is authentic, but confidential. I'm sure Bishop Williamson didn't publish it, and so he's not to blame.

Yes, I too have heard from the most trustworthy of sources.  The letter is genuine, and Bp. W did NOT publish it.  However, the matter has been handled rather carelessly, and whether or not the bishop must bear some responsibility for that carelessness, the jury is still out.