Author Topic: Leave Fr. Pfeiffer and Pablo alone (Read 10497 times)

Ladislaus · « **Reply #15 on:** November 19, 2014, 09:58:49 AM »

Yet ANOTHER Pfeifferista posting emotional garbage.

This makes about the 7th or 8th one. I am very close to calling the Boston compound an outright cult, a sect based on the mesmerizing personality of Joseph Pfeiffer.

What is wrong with you people?

This isn't about people just gratuitously "attacking" Father Pfeiffer. We are making RATIONAL and REASONABLE and WELL-FOUNDED CRITICISMS of Father Pfeiffer's positions (red-light) and behavior (refusing to distance himself from Pablo's attacks against Fr. Z and Bishop Williamson, outing coordinators' personal information, and CLEARLY FOSTERING A PERSONALITY CULT AROUND HIMSELF).

If you want to defend Father Pfeiffer, provide a justification for his Red-Light position, which I am calling out as schismatic. Defend it. Provide some rational justification for the position.

Yet another effeminate emotional please on behalf of Father Pfeiffer. Does Pfeiffer have a castrati operation going on down there on the Boston farm?

Ladislaus · « **Reply #16 on:** November 19, 2014, 10:01:59 AM »

As for Father Pfeiffer's "zeal", the motivations for such zeal can often be ambiguous. Sometimes it's driven by a self-willed desire to promote oneself and the delusion of being some kind of crusader, the last Catholic priest standing in the world. Such efforts can just as easily be motivated by pride and self-will as by legitimate concern for souls. Only God knows which one. But don't try to use that nonsense as a justification for "red-lightism"; it has nothing to do with Pfeiffer's theological positions.

What zeal for souls caused Pfeiffer to attack a potential fellow laborer? He'd rather restrict access to the Sacraments than to share "turf" or "territory" with Father Zendejas.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #17 on:** November 19, 2014, 10:06:32 AM »

While I had been sympathetic to the Resistance early on, right out of the gate I detected a disturbing tone in Father Pfeiffer's sermons. Apart from the fact that he's basically angry and "yelling" the entire time, you can detected this notion of "exceptionalism", with Father Pfeiffer preening and setting himself up as some kind of divinely-anointed shepherd of the last remnant of the remnant of the remnant of the Church, almost as if the Holy See had been transferred to Boston, KY.

If we're looking for signs from heaven, Bishop Williamson, perhaps the fact that the Pfeiffer home burned down during Mass in Boston shortly after the Resistance began should mean something. Perhaps Paul Hernandez had something going on the grill there.

Matthew · « **Reply #18 on:** November 19, 2014, 10:09:16 AM »

Quote from: Ladislaus

What zeal for souls caused Pfeiffer to attack a potential fellow laborer? He'd rather restrict access to the Sacraments than to share "turf" or "territory" with Father Zendejas.

Actually, there's no "potential" about it -- he IS a fellow laborer in the Church, (tending to souls, fighting modernism, teaching the Faith, etc.)

He was a potential co-worker or associate.

That's precisely what Fr. Pfeiffer is forgetting! Fr. Zendejas could "take over" that chapel, serve them with what they need (taking better care of them than Fr. Pfeiffer ever could, due to being spread thin), and everyone involved would win EXCEPT Fr. Pfeiffer. What is wrong with that? Sounds like 99.5% WIN to me!

But to Fr. Pfeiffer, it's a 100% LOSE because he's only thinking about his own group.

Thurifer7 · « **Reply #19 on:** November 19, 2014, 10:30:28 AM »

Quote from: ultrarigorist

Quote from: John Steven
Quote from: MaterDominici
That was interesting, Patrick, but your list needs some serious help.

I got the biggest laugh at SSS being named Susan. I guess she does a pretty good job at keeping herself undercover.

I saw the list before it was taken down. Looks like there was a lot of time being spent by someone compiling all of that and I did not get the impression it was Patrick that compiled it.

We are being watched and monitored. :tv-disturbed:

I saw the list too. It was obviously a compilation of screen names which were targeted for identification, to which details were added. I think it was not a solitary effort either. As best I can tell, the list is of active forum posters who were unsympathetic to the re-branded SSPX. The ones from IA and maybe AB had locations pinned to them by IP, but the CI-only posters were identified by forum comments. So someone had access to either the listowner of IA, and/or the the hosting firms. This was no small effort, it meant someone(s) carefully reading thru many thousands of posts to glean this info. The give away column was the one identifying which Mass center the individual was associated with. Our enemy people, is not beyond using any means for their end, and we could all do well to carefully consider who we attack. This list was also NOT made recently, it is at least a year old.

I'm sure someone saved it before it was taken down. Which is scary because no one knows who has what information.