Author Topic: Krahgate (Read 28933 times)

Telesphorus · « **Reply #90 on:** October 29, 2012, 08:55:22 PM »

Quote

Just as many "Catholics," including prelates, seem no longer to have a clear understanding of the sin of usury, many "Catholics" seem no longer to have a clear understanding of the sin of lying or how one may be an accomplice to grave sins.

Yes, the priests counsel lying.

Miseremini · « **Reply #91 on:** October 30, 2012, 07:03:15 PM »

In the interview Max Krah said

"There is a family in Austria which wanted to donate to the SSPX, but did not want to donate directly. They wanted to establish a foundation that would support the SSPX. And in every foundation you need some trustees. It’s a kind of trust, and I am one of the trustees. I was chosen by the family who established the foundation, firstly because I am a Traditional Catholic attorney with links to the SSPX, and secondly because of my professional record."

I understand what a trust is and what a trustee is. Is there a lawyer out there who can tell me what "It's a kind of trust" is?

Incredulous · « **Reply #92 on:** October 30, 2012, 07:54:04 PM »

Quote from: Miseremini

In the interview Max Krah said

"There is a family in Austria which wanted to donate to the SSPX, but did not want to donate directly. They wanted to establish a foundation that would support the SSPX. And in every foundation you need some trustees. It’s a kind of trust, and I am one of the trustees. I was chosen by the family who established the foundation, firstly because I am a Traditional Catholic attorney with links to the SSPX, and secondly because of my professional record."

I understand what a trust is and what a trustee is. Is there a lawyer out there who can tell me what "It's a kind of trust" is?

Hmm... the Krah puzzler

Do you suppose he really meant, It's a kind of a Fagin's treasure ?

Telesphorus · « **Reply #93 on:** October 30, 2012, 07:58:16 PM »

This isn't Angelqueen.

Gutman, aka, The FAT MAN - seeker of THE BLACK BIRD

John Grace · « **Reply #94 on:** October 31, 2012, 07:48:11 AM »

The name Mischa Morgenbesser was mentioned in the 'Krahgate' file.Reading the snippet below reminded me of something. Is it true that Morgenbesser is married to a Rothschild woman or is it an "internet rumour"?

http://cathinfo-warning-pornography!/Ignis_Ardens/index.php?showtopic=11233&st=200

Quote

This final piece of evidence which explains the SSPX Jaidhof corporation is here:

http://www.jaidhof.at/index.php?channel=113&content=1513

The Jaidhof property is ill gotten gains of the Rothschild-Gutmann empire.

Check please.

Ethelred · « **Reply #95 on:** October 31, 2012, 09:07:42 AM »

Quote from: John Grace

The name Mischa Morgenbesser was mentioned in the 'Krahgate' file.Reading the snippet below reminded me of something. Is it true that Morgenbesser is married to a Rothschild woman or is it an "internet rumour"?

http://cathinfo-warning-pornography!/Ignis_Ardens/index.php?showtopic=11233&st=200
Quote
This final piece of evidence which explains the SSPX Jaidhof corporation is here:

http://www.jaidhof.at/index.php?channel=113&content=1513

The Jaidhof property is ill gotten gains of the Rothschild-Gutmann empire.

Check please.

Yes, the woman who donated as heritage the Jaidhof castle and a ton of money to the SSPX, was Jєωιѕн.

I just didn't know she was from the Rothschild clan! But that's an interesting info, John. So maybe Krah and his Jєωιѕн backers thought: "It's 'ours' anyway, so let's get it back..." ?

But also the name "Morgenbesser" sounds Jєωιѕн. It's usually two different German words put together to a strange sounding name.
- In English Morgenbesser would be: Morning-Better
- Or Spielberg would be: Play-Mountain
- Or Einstein would be: One-Stone
- Or Maxkrah would be: Maxi-Crow

Oh, the last one was a joke, isn't it? No I think Krah is a rather Jєωιѕн name, too.

Diego · « **Reply #96 on:** October 31, 2012, 09:50:26 AM »

I am sure that it is lost on nobody that Krah has answered no charges here on CathInfo. No scripted softball interview here. No tolerance here of mental reservations, misdirections, straw man arguments, Judaism/Zionism, pornography, blasphemy, or accomplices in sin.

John Grace · « **Reply #97 on:** October 31, 2012, 10:47:46 AM »

To provide the context, here is the piece where Veritas1961 asks Fr Laisney SSPX the following.

http://krahgatefile.blogspot.ie/2011/01/krahgate-reply-to-fr-laisney.html

Quote

9. A small but related question: You said that “ he MAY have some Jєωιѕн friends.” “William of Norwich” showed beyond any doubt that he DOES through the link just cited. One question, since I assume that you must know Mr Krah to make these statements, is this: would he happen to be a friend of Mischa Morgenbesser, a lawyer with BADERTSCHER Rechtsanwälte AG (Zurich), who is the sole Hebrew speaker with the firm, the firm that advises the SSPX in relation to Dello Sarto? Do you know if this firm was suggested by Mr Krah to the leadership of the SSPX?

A Mischa Morgenbesser in Zurich is married to a Rotschild. Is this the same Mischa Morgenbesser mentioned in the question to Fr Laisney?. Also a surname is given of Morgenbesser-Rotschild.Are they the same family?

John Grace · « **Reply #98 on:** October 31, 2012, 10:56:52 AM »

http://www.onlysimchas.com/v4/index.cfm/fuseaction:simcha.view/simchaid:30156

Quote

Birth of
BOY TO MISCHA AND TIKVA MORGENBESSER-ROTHSCHILD
( zürich , Switzerland )
Tuesday, November, 23, 2004

Is this the same Mischa Morgenbesser mentioned in the question posed to Fr Laisney SSPX, who stated Krah sole involvement in the CDU was a donation to (Kloster St Marienthal). Nobody has mentioned this convent until Fr Laisney SSPX did.

Quote

10. In your letter you comment: “Note that Mr. Krah's involvement with the CDU consisted in a donation to a convent (Kloster St Marienthal): if that is the only thing you found against him, that is not much to worry.” My dear Father Laisney, this one sentence alone leads to several questions and which, at the same time, raises questions about your actual knowledge and intimacy with the whole affair. Let me explain. Mr Krah’s involvement with the CDU was NOT limited to seeking a donation for the convent of St. Marienthal. If you went to the link given by “William of Norwich” concerning Mr Krah and his actual relations with the CDU, you would see that according to the “Journal of the Dresdener Union” (the July/August 2005 number) Mr Krah was elected the Pressesprecher, Press Officer, for Dresden’s CDU governing committee in June 2005 with 81.66% of the branch’s membership. Moreover, the May 2006 number of the same “Journal” reveals that he had by then become a member of the editorial board of the “Journal.” Mr Krah’s involvement with politics does not concern me greatly beyond the fact that the CDU is neither Christian in any sense worthy of the name, nor is it democratic in any profound sense. But it is clearly anti-Catholic when it wishes to be, as the occasion when Angela Merkel publicly rebuked the Pope about the so-called “rehabilitation” of Mgr Williamson demonstrates – a public scandal about which the SSPX has said little or nothing, made all the more worrying given the cant of the CDU about the “benefits” of the separation of Church and State. I would invite you to check these details for yourself, but since “William of Norwich” posted the CDU/Krah link it has mysteriously disappeared from the internet. However, one brave Catholic soul had the foresight to save the two files about the CDU cited, and they will be posted to”The Complete Krahgate File” in the near future so that you and others may see the facts for yourself.

11. There is, however, one surprising thing in your sentence. You make reference to the Kloster St. Marienthal and say that Krah’s only involvement in the CDU was to seek donations for it. Let us leave aside the fact that the St. Marienthal Convent, the oldest women’s Cistercian monastery in Germany, is a conciliar structure and seems to be more a place for hosting conferences on “Justice, Peace, Ecology” and the rest of the conciliar agenda, than a place full of nuns working out their salvation in prayer and sacrifice; let us leave aside also the fact that one wonders why a person who claims to be a traditional Catholic would seek to raise money for a conciliar structure when undoubtedly there are better claims to be made for SSPX structures in Germany; let us leave aside as well that the Convent in question is less than a hour’s drive from Krah’s home, is incredibly beautiful, a glory to the faith, clearly worth a financial fortune if put on the market, and is run by a “Board of Trustees,” the composition of which I have not been able to identify as yet, and come to one crucial question. At NO POINT in “The Complete Krahgate File” or anywhere else on Ignis Ardens was ANY REFERENCE MADE TO THIS CONVENT AND KRAH MAKING AN APPEAL FOR FUNDS FOR IT! The convent is not mentioned in either of the two CDU files that were available online until they disappeared. So your statement is a piece of information that none of us were aware of, and we would invite you to let us know how you came across this information? It may be of little importance, but given that Mr Krah appears to have many fingers in many pies, one can never be sure that that is so.

Wessex · « **Reply #99 on:** October 31, 2012, 01:31:25 PM »

The plot thickens. Questions surrounding the involvement of the Rothschild family in the affairs of the Society are being aired on Ignis Ardens. And as usual a number of people are appearing including Krah fending off accusations of such participation. One wonders what in say ten years the Society will turn into.

Incredulous · « **Reply #100 on:** October 31, 2012, 01:43:04 PM »

Another Krah bombshell explodes!

This story is incredible.

Instead of the term "neoSSPX"... SSPXJ (for judaized) may be more appropriate.

Incredulous · « **Reply #101 on:** October 31, 2012, 02:05:45 PM »

Quote from: Wessex

The plot thickens. Questions surrounding the involvement of the Rothschild family in the affairs of the Society are being aired on Ignis Ardens. And as usual a number of people are appearing including Krah fending off accusations of such participation. One wonders what in say ten years the Society will turn into.

I almost forget Wessex, the English Pointer hound.

One of the stealthiest noses still alive on Ignis Ardens.

Diego · « **Reply #102 on:** October 31, 2012, 02:33:27 PM »

I think we are well past the point of moral certitude of the Judaic infiltration.

Wessex · « **Reply #103 on:** October 31, 2012, 04:08:34 PM »

Quote from: Incredulous

Quote from: Wessex
The plot thickens. Questions surrounding the involvement of the Rothschild family in the affairs of the Society are being aired on Ignis Ardens. And as usual a number of people are appearing including Krah fending off accusations of such participation. One wonders what in say ten years the Society will turn into.

I almost forget Wessex, the English Pointer hound.

One of the stealthiest noses still alive on Ignis Ardens.

Wow, Incredulous, I almost acquired a Pointer some years ago but opted for a more domesticated Dalmatian instead as I was not into hunting back then. I have a feeling IA may call a halt on more Krah revelations and do another purge. But over 9000 hits on the subject so far is giving the site some publicity .... if it wants it!!!

Columba · « **Reply #104 on:** October 31, 2012, 04:17:51 PM »

Quote from: Wessex

I have a feeling IA may call a halt on more Krah revelations and do another purge. But over 9000 hits on the subject so far is giving the site some publicity .... if it wants it!!!

They have just removed the thread.