Recently an Irish broadcaster called Israel a "cancer". The TV company have not received complaints.

http://www.independent.ie/national-news/i-am-not-antisemitic-claims-vincent-browne-3276074.html

By Michael Brennan Deputy Political Editor
Saturday October 27 2012
TV3 broadcaster Vincent Browne insists he is not anti-Semitic after branding Israel a "cancer" in foreign affairs.

But Israel's deputy ambassador to Ireland said she never believed the day would come when an Irish TV presenter would make "racist, anti-Semitic remarks".

Mr Browne, pictured, had been complaining on his show about the lack of discussion of Israel during the last US presidential debate between Republican nominee Mitt Romney and US President Barack Obama.

"Israel is the cancer in foreign affairs. It polarises the Islamic community of the world against the rest of the world," he said.

"Unless you deal with the problem of Israel and the Palestinians in that part of the world, there's going to be conflict and disharmony. It's a massive injustice -- they stole the land from the Arabs."

Mr Browne admitted that his choice of language could have been better but insisted that the criticism was justified.

"What I resent is the suggestion that because you're critical of Israel, you're automatically anti-Semitic. I don't think that's acceptable," he said.

Mr Browne refused to apologise for his remarks, saying that Israel was founded in 1948 by taking land from the Arabs.

He said it was "blackmail" to try to brand everyone who was critical of Israel as anti-Semitic. "I don't think I differ too much from Irish or European foreign policy," he said.

But his remarks drew a strong reaction from Israel's deputy ambassador to Ireland Nurit Tinari-Modai, who said her grandparents were brutally murdered during the h0Ɩ0cαųst.

"I would have never believed that the day would come when a presenter on an Irish TV station would make racist, anti-Semitic remarks," she said.

She made her comments to the 'Jєωιѕн Chronicle' newspaper, the most widely read Jєωιѕн newspaper in Britain.

A TV3 spokeswoman said she was not aware of any complaints being made about Mr Browne's remarks.

St. Thomas Aquinas states that blasphemy is a greater sin than murder.

Here we have as a representative for the SSPX, someone who publicly admires those notorious for blasphemy, (Madonna) who identifies himself as a strong supporter of a state which is known for its special protection to religion that is absolutely inimical to the name of Christ, whose people engage in ceaseless, remorseless blasphemies, who use the mass media to spread these blasphemies, who settle their insane Yeshiva school fanatics in proximity to Christian Holy sites, that they desecrate them, when they aren't spitting on priests.

This man is being raised to a high position, while Archbishop Lefebvre's choice for bishop is expelled for going to give confirmations and publishing the Eleison Comments.  This is the most abject perfidy on the part of the Fellay cabal.  Abject treachery and perfidy, in favor of the enemies of Christ, whom he has called "elder brothers."

One more thing. How is it that twoof the most recent hired on clowns of the world "accidently" met on the elevator? Sounds like MM should be writing fiction.

Oh that's certainly possible.

The Remnant is a neo-trad paper that has gone over to neo-traditionalism, trying to reconcile a Council conceived in modernism with Catholic Tradition, as Father Chazal points out - DICI referenced his writings.

Siscoe:  So you’re not Jєωιѕн?  No Jєωιѕн background?  You were baptized a Catholic as a child?

Krah:  Of course, I am a Catholic.  That’s it.  About these accusations of being Jєωιѕн, I´d like to tell a story about when Charles Chaplin came to Germany in the early 1930’s.  A lot of people from Berlin came to see him, and Hitler was jealous.  The nαzι newspapers wrote an article criticizing and shaming so many Germans for applauding a Jew.  When Chaplin came back to Hollywood, he was asked why he had not declared that he is not Jєωιѕн.  His answer was: if I would have denied it officially, I would have felt as if I was agreeing that there was something bad about being Jєωιѕн.  Given the mentality of the people at the time, he said it would have only contributed to the work of the nαzι’s, and this is why he didn’t say “I am not Jєωιѕн”. I had a quite similar reaction when I first read these accusations about myself.  I sent an email to a US priest of the SSPX and asked him what I should do, and he advised me to keep silent because there is definitely nothing bad about being of the same people as Jesus and Mary.  Moreover, in the early times of Christianity, the front rows in churches were reserved to the Christians with Jєωιѕн roots. That said, I do not think there is anything bad about people having Jєωιѕн roots.  I simply do not have it.

I recall 'Veritas1961' asking Fr Laisney

8. You write:“Mr Krah is not a Jew, though he may have some Jєωιѕн friends, which is not uncommon in the legal world.” What is the basis of your statement that Mr Krah is not a Jew? Mr Krah in a statement posted on December 28 2010, at 02:12 PM on Ignis Ardens made a number of statements, but at no point did he deny that he was a Jew? He only asserted that he was a Catholic. Well, Cardinal Lustiger called himself a Catholic, did he not, but he equally asserted that he was a Jew? Given that this was one of the more astonishing statements made by “William of Norwich” does it not strike you as significant that Mr Krah did not make plain his – according to you – non-Jєωιѕн status? It could hardly be construed as the oversight of a very minor detail can it? Moreover, while you assert that Mr Krah is not a Jew, you give no evidence, circuмstantial or otherwise, to support this assertion. You cannot say that he denied it, because in his one and only public statement he has not done so. Nor can you retort that “William of Norwich” is in the same boat as you: making an assertion without any kind of evidence. “William of Norwich” gave the following link by way of support: Link: American Friends of Tel Aviv University
http://www.aftau.org/site/PageServer?pagen...0_AlumniAuction If you would care to look carefully at all of the photographs available at this link, you will see that every person has been named. I do not believe that one has to be an expert in family names to recognise that they are all Jєωιѕн, at a Jєωιѕн event, in the city with the highest Jєωιѕн population in the world (Israel notwithstanding), and supporting the work of an Israeli university that is dominated by the Israeli security forces which have a long history of anti-Catholic and anti-Christian activity of the most murderous kind. Is it really credible, in the absence of a forthright denial by Mr Krah of being Jєωιѕн, to believe, as you clearly believe, that he was the only NON-JEW present?

Also asked of Fr Laisney was this.The reply from Fr Laisney raised many fresh questions.

10. In your letter you comment: “Note that Mr. Krah's involvement with the CDU consisted in a donation to a convent (Kloster St Marienthal): if that is the only thing you found against him, that is not much to worry.” My dear Father Laisney, this one sentence alone leads to several questions and which, at the same time, raises questions about your actual knowledge and intimacy with the whole affair. Let me explain. Mr Krah’s involvement with the CDU was NOT limited to seeking a donation for the convent of St. Marienthal. If you went to the link given by “William of Norwich” concerning Mr Krah and his actual relations with the CDU, you would see that according to the “Journal of the Dresdener Union” (the July/August 2005 number) Mr Krah was elected the Pressesprecher, Press Officer, for Dresden’s CDU governing committee in June 2005 with 81.66% of the branch’s membership. Moreover, the May 2006 number of the same “Journal” reveals that he had by then become a member of the editorial board of the “Journal.” Mr Krah’s involvement with politics does not concern me greatly beyond the fact that the CDU is neither Christian in any sense worthy of the name, nor is it democratic in any profound sense. But it is clearly anti-Catholic when it wishes to be, as the occasion when Angela Merkel publicly rebuked the Pope about the so-called “rehabilitation” of Mgr Williamson demonstrates – a public scandal about which the SSPX has said little or nothing, made all the more worrying given the cant of the CDU about the “benefits” of the separation of Church and State. I would invite you to check these details for yourself, but since “William of Norwich” posted the CDU/Krah link it has mysteriously disappeared from the internet. However, one brave Catholic soul had the foresight to save the two files about the CDU cited, and they will be posted to”The Complete Krahgate File” in the near future so that you and others may see the facts for yourself.

"Moreover, in the early times of Christianity, the front rows in churches were reserved to the Christians with Jєωιѕн roots. "

Supposing this is true, which I doubt, one has to consider the irony of Benedict XVI sitting passively in front of a Jєωιѕн ѕуηαgσgυє congregation as they sing the hymns of their Christ denying religion.

I´d like to tell a story about when Charles Chaplin came to Germany in the early 1930’s.

Let's make something perfectly clear, there was plenty of reason to suspect Chaplin was Jєωιѕн:

According to the files which were made public recently, the U.S. believed Chaplin may have been a Russian Jew and that his real name was Israel Thornstein.

http://www.algemeiner.com/2012/02/17/was-charlie-chaplin-Jєωιѕн/

Even the man himself seemed to have wondered about it:

In 1948 the US Navy investigated Chaplin on suspicion of Zionist activity: shipping guns to Palestine, as well as around 36 tanks. But it was the FBI under Hoover that became Chaplin’s greatest political and legal enemy. Chaplin’s FBI file is a comprehensive laboratory for identity construction that began in 1922 and remained open until after his death. The file chronicles Chaplin’s downfall, the suspicion of Communist activities, the Mann Act trial for transporting unmarried women across state lines for deviant purposes, and further rumours and innuendo that led to his expulsion from America in 1952. Chaplin is continually described as ‘of Jєωιѕн extraction,’ given the name of ‘Thonstein’ as an alias (though there is no proof that Chaplin ever used this name himself), and assigned attributes such as ‘Jєωιѕн accent,’ ‘talks with hands,’ and Russian birth.
Crucially, it was not Jєωιѕнness that alarmed Hoover but ambiguity. According to Omer Bartov in his compelling work The Jew in Cinema, Jєωιѕн characters are often portrayed as slippery and protean, possessing an insidious ability to obscure their Jєωιѕнness and blend in. The emancipation of the Jews from the ghettos of Europe at the turn of the last century had left them free to shave and dress in modern clothing, making them impossible to detect. This new found ambiguity of Jєωιѕн identity made them, in many gentile eyes, the most dangerous minority in civilised society. Ambiguity was the dominant paranoia of Cold-War America, which felt itself threatened by the enemy within—the Communists, Jews and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs who were so hard to detect. The insistence on Chaplin’s Jєωιѕнness helped reinforce the notion of an ‘authentic American’ by establishing firm conceptual borders through identity construction and categorisation.
Not only did both Jєωιѕн and gentile audiences see him as a Jew, but Chaplin himself very nearly became convinced of his own Jєωιѕнness. While he did not officially doubt his mother’s version of his parentage, in which her legal husband, Charles Chaplin, Sr., a non-Jєωιѕн pop singer, was his biological father, there were times when he clearly wondered if the questions surrounding his lineage were true, and if they were more scandalous than imagined. His step-brother Sydney had a Jєωιѕн father and the world’s insistence on Chaplin’s Jєωιѕн origins prompted him and many others to wonder whether their birth stories had in fact been reversed.
‘All geniuses,’ Chaplin was heard to remark,‘have some Jєωιѕн blood in them.’ Flattered by the widely held misconception about his Jєωιѕн identity, his understanding of Jєωιѕнness was simplistic and stereotypical: Jews were blessed
with superior intellect and financial acuмen than non-Jews. Further, he believed that his physical attributes compounded the myth: he was short with curly black hair, ‘Oriental facial features’, and a prominent nose. In footage taken
of famed British comedian Harry Lauder’s visit to Chaplin Studios, Lauder draws Chaplin on a chalkboard. Chaplin makes great show of stopping him, pantomimes ‘too Jєωιѕн,’ and re-draws the nose. Quite how to interpret this is unclear, but Chaplin either believed himself to be Jєωιѕн or was making fun of those who did. In the absence of confirmed roots, Chaplin may have sought to align himself with a group that, although outsiders in mainstream society, seemed to him possessed of an ancient and mystical national bond. When the great cantor Yossele Rosenblatt visited Chaplin’s studios, Chaplin told him that he owned all of the cantor’s recordings and that ‘Whenever I feel a little blue, I take them out and play them. They do something to me. They unite me, oh so closely, with my Jєωιѕн ancestors.’

http://Jєωιѕнquarterly.org/2010/11/charlie-chaplin-Jєωιѕн-or-goyish/

It's funny Siscoe refers to this as a 'rumor'

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2012-1031-siscoe-krah-interview.htm

Alright, moving on to another rumor, are you connected in any way with the Society’s School St. Theresa

http://www.theresiengymnasium.de/ueber-uns/satzung.html

§ 7
Gründungsvorstände

Die Stifter benennen als Mitglieder des ersten Vorstandes (Gründungsvorstände):

a) P. Peter Lang als Vorsitzender
b) Herr StB Heinrich Riegel
c) Herr RA Maximilian Krah

The question remains of what the man with the interest in Madonna and listed an 'erotic' film on his Facebook is doing involved in this school.

Many faithful have raised concerns. On his Facebook, he did list lingerie and whips on a 'like' page.He listed 'Agent Provocateur' as an interest.

http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=15187&f=4&min=110&num=10
"
Welcome to the official fan page of luxury lingerie brand, Agent Provocateur.

"The sexiest website in the world", Vogue.
Company Overview The world famous luxury lingerie brand has stores across the fashion centres of the world, including in London, New York, Vancouver, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Paris, Vienna, Berlin and more. The first shop was opened on London's Broadwick Street in the Soho district in 1994.
Mission Agent Provocateur believes that passion and intimacy should be indulged, and that exploring your inner desires and fantasies profoundly enriches your life.

Agent Provocateur lingerie is an opulent range of inspirational creations, designed to intensify life’s pleasures and unlock your innermost desires. Our elegant ranges, designed with both the boardroom and the boudoir in mind, ensure that women can be sexy and professional as the mood takes them.
Products Designer lingerie - Bras - Knickers - Suspender belts - Corsetry - Bodysuits - Nightwear - Hosiery - Garters - Bridal lingerie - Swimwear - Perfume - Beauty products - Massage oil - Pasties - Whips - Gloves -"

It's a total setup.

Of course it is.

Also among his interests, he listed "DesignerHeels".Since removed.Disclaimer. Photograph for information purpose only. I'm not suggesting Herr Krah wears designer heels but he did 'like' this Facebook page.

Activities and Interests
Other Columbia University, Thomas de Maizière, Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, Angela Merkel, London Business School, KDStV Chursachsen, 116. Mittelschule Dresden, Kreuzgymnasium, Columbia University, Columbia Business School Executive MBA Program, LinkedIn, Mittelstandsvereinigung der CDU Dresden, CDU Dresden, Hotel Sacher, Josef Ackermann, Agent Provocateur, Joachim Gauck, Exzellenz für Dresden, Junge Union Dresden, Junge Union Sachsen & Niederschlesien, Lufthansa, Lufthansa Senator Status, The Oratory of S Philip Neri in London (Brompton Oratory), Pushkin Cafe, Russian Ministry for Economic Development, Sankt Petersburg, Moscow, Patrick Schreiber, GUT JAIDHOF, DesignerHeels, vorne-sitzen.de, Ipad 2, Boris Johnson, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, EINSTEIN KAFFEE Dresden, Bobby Jindal, Friedrich Merz, Columbia Business School, Russian Standard Deutschland, gerne-katholisch.de, EB&Flow, CDU Dresden - Ortsverband Zschachwitz, CallaJet.de (Privatjet Charter Broker), German Embassy Washington, CDU-Fraktion Sachsen, Bishop Bernard Fellay, Henryk M. Broder, The Economist, Support German Troops, Donald Rumsfeld, Dmitri Shostakovich, Wir wollen Guttenberg zurück, DER SPIEGEL, Nicolas Sarkozy, Royal Opera House, Semperoper, FÜR Stuttgart 21, Benedikt XVI, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, SPAM, CDU Hamburg, EMBA Global Asia 2012and 47 more

http://www.facebook.com/designerheels