I am claiming that Ecunemical Councils do not err. The fallible part of the narrative simply concerns disciplinary issues that are temporary in nature; but there are still not errors. The Holy Ghost assists Ecunemical Councils.
What part of that don't you understand?
Cantarella,
This is just another claim that there is a non-infallible infallibility to go along with the infallible infallibility. Or as Ladislaus likes to call it, the "Infallible Security." This really means the pope is your rule of faith because it is the pope who engages the Magisterium and without the pope, there is no Magisterium. The pope has to be the rule of faith because he personally can never err.
This historically is untenable. And if the pope is the personal rule of faith regarding doctrine, why not morals as well? When you include area of morals to which the infallibility of the Church also extends it is easier to why the pope cannot be the rule of faith.
Even the authority you just cited is not saying what you claim. The quote you provided says:
"Secondly we note, that the holy Councils lawfully kept for determination, or clearing of doubts, or condemning of errors and Heresies, or appeasing of Schisms and troubles, or reformation of like, and such like important matters, have ever the assistance of God’s Spirit, and therefore cannot err in their sentences and determination concerning the same, because the Holy Ghost cannot err, from whom (as you see here) jointly with the Council the resolution proceedeth."
Quote provided by Cantarella
I agree perfectly with this quote. But what do we call the Councils “determination, clearing of doubts, or condemning of errors and heresies, etc., etc.,? They are called Dogmas. And it is in these determinations where the help of the Holy Ghost is always and infallibly present because the Holy Ghost is the formal and final cause of Dogma. When there is no intent to make a “determination” on these matters of faith and morals, there is no infallibility present.
Drew