What an utterly dishonest liar you are, Drew. It was apparent that you misunderstood my use of the term REVELATION and that you were using in the sense of "truths revealed" whereas I was using it to mean "God's act or process of revealing". You then denied that it could have the second sense, claiming that I was ignorant of English ... all to promote your ridiculous ad hominem narrative that I had committed some kind of "colossal error". Then I shut you up (but I guess only temporarily) with a post from Dictionary.com which lists MY use of the term revelation as definition #1 while yours was definition #2. So much for my ignorance of English.
You are a liar and a calumniator. You started out with the lie that we hold the Pope to be the rule of faith whereas we clearly said it was the Magisterium. Then you backed down for a while, but then kept reasserting this lie.
You are really a disgrace. You are the one who's absolutely consumed with vanity ... to the point of promoting Protestant heresy rather than admitting a mistake you made editorializing on some public blog.
Let's revisit this briefly, since you continue with your calumny. Dictionary.com:
So the meaning that I was using for the term "revelation" is listed as #1 above ... which I cited to you after you claimed that it could no be used that way and that I was ignorant of English.
And, despite the above, you continue to falsely accuse me of heresy, asserting that I claimed that the Magisterium is not #2, a revealed truth. And I explicitly rejected the heretical proposition of which you accused me as being false and indeed heretical.
You so commit a grave sin now by falsely accusing me of Protestant heresy yet again ... AFTER this has been brought to your attention.
I demand a public retraction and apology. And you need to go to Confession, buddy.
Matthew-
In the last few days, I’ve watched this Ladislaus guy call several people liars, idiots, disgraced, and calumniators:
Me, Samuel, Drew, Pax Vobis (and presumably anyone else who might come forward to oppose him in the future).
And while your stated purpose for letting
sedes post is because you want high traffic, ironically, their bitter spirit is chasing the more intelligent traffic away, while attracting all manner of fringe craziness (sede, flat earth, etc).
The result is a qualitative decline in the quality of post, and as already mentioned, CI is known today more as a sedevacantist forum than a Resistance forum.
Sorry to see it being run into the ground, but who wants to attack the sede errors if he will be machine gunned with insults?
You just banned some lady for liking Fox News, etc., but the sede clout here apparently exempts them from threat of same, despite the most persistent and outrageous behavior?
Topic: Is Father Ringrose dumping the R & R crowd? (Read 441869 times)