Author Topic: http:www.sossaveoursspx.com (Read 12827 times)

magdalena · « **Reply #20 on:** September 20, 2012, 08:36:40 PM »

Quote from: Ferdinand

Apostate rome was displeased by the sell-out plot being exposed by the three, a handful of good Priests and the efforts of some valiant laity. Too few souls would have ended up in roman clutches.

B16 sent him back to purge the resistance and repackage the deal. In the end rome will "honour" the 6 conditions, but like all Indian Treaties it won't be worth the paper it is written on.

Of course, "In the end rome will "honour" the 6 condition...." since the "6 conditions" are in reality, compromises of the Faith. And these compromises will be further compromised, and further compromised, ad infinitum, until we will no longer recognize it as anything remotely Traditional, because end justifies the means. And the end Rome desires is the utter destruction of the True Catholic Faith as it was once practiced and believed throughout antiquity.

magdalena · « **Reply #21 on:** September 20, 2012, 08:37:27 PM »

Sorry, accidently re-submitted.

Magna opera Domini · « **Reply #22 on:** September 21, 2012, 12:54:15 AM »

Quote:
"I have not yet been able to verify this, but if Communion was withheld, I am sure it was not for public disagreement but because the priest knows that person to be in state of unrepentent sin."

Well that's a certainty without any proffered evidence. You know something about the state of this person's soul?

Quote continued:
"That is a perfectly acceptable reason for a priest to withhold Communion."

That raises an interesting question. If a person is in a state of mortal sin, the priest knows it, but the rest of the congregation does not, is the priest obliged to withhold Communion, and thereby publish the state of the soul, or to give Holy Communion so as not to "out" the sinner? Sorry, but I'm not willing to automatically accept your opinion on the matter.

MaterDominici · « **Reply #23 on:** September 21, 2012, 01:07:11 AM »

Quote from: Magna opera Domini

That raises an interesting question. If a person is in a state of mortal sin, the priest knows it, but the rest of the congregation does not, is the priest obliged to withhold Communion, and thereby publish the state of the soul, or to give Holy Communion so as not to "out" the sinner?

I'm pretty sure the Church goes so far as to say that the priest is not allowed to deny Communion (in a public setting) to the sinner whose sins are private.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #24 on:** September 21, 2012, 11:14:02 PM »

Quote from: NeelyAnn

Quote from: magdalena
NeelyAnn,
Does your husband know how to read and write? I'm not big on hearsay.
:confused1:

Funny, because that entire article is based on hearsay and my guess is you liked it very much and you are ready to swallow every bit of what it says, true or not, simply because it is what you want to hear.

My husband was there and called me after the conference to tell me what was said and how it went. He also made a point to speak with Fr. Rostand in person, on his own.

As I stated, when he returns, I will go over the entire post, from the 'sos...' website, with him.

NeelyAnn, keep in mind (did you read this part?):

Quote from: sossaveoursspx

This web site is not for those who do not want to read it -- stay off is my recommendation... There's nobody on the world wide web that is being forced to access this page. To hit "enter" is totally voluntary.