On that note, the wiser amongst you can expand a similar nothingness out to the real world. This great “split” that certain minorities fantasize about will become nothing – or nearly nothing. “Nothing to speak of” I suppose is the term. No schools, no seminaries, no chapels, no convents, no real estate, no meaningful financing and no substantial priesthood.
Mr. Grasmeier's sense of being depends on his going along with the majority, being on the "winning" side, the side that has the properties, the majority of priests and laity, the Zionist lawyer, Vatican II, the approval of a modernist hierarchy. etc.
He thinks of priests like Father Chazal as being "nothing" - what does that say about his Faith? The priority he puts on Faith?
Is there even the slightest effort, attempt, to answer criticism in this statement?