Author Topic: Good out of evil (Read 4484 times)

sspxbvm · « **Reply #5 on:** March 03, 2013, 10:03:04 PM »

Quote from: s2srea

Quote from: sspxbvm
This whole case with Pablo has given us all the more assurance that where we stand in the Resistance is the right way to go. Why else would Satan inject his influence so boldly? Into a small movement at that!

Forgive me SSPXBVM, but I often find that such logic is contrary to reason. I don't doubt the righteousness of the resistance, but this sort of thinking may lead people down dangerous roads. I honestly don't know what to make of the Paul Hernandez case at this point, other than viewing it for what it is.

I have not been as active/ up to date on this sight in recent months, but from what I could tell Mr. Hernandez has been a 'go to guy' for both Pfeiffer and the faithful whilst simultaneously betraying the weirdest of characters in so many of his responses. Why was this so? I am not demanding an explanation of any sort- but it would be good to know why. What he just full of time on his hands and the only who would offer support at this point? Something else?

What is this " logic" that is contrary to reason? What dangerous roads?

And in answer to another post. Yes. Matthew has dealt with that portion of the problem that has to do with his website. However, let's not be dumb sheep and follow blindly. We should demand an explantion as to why Fr. does nothing about you know who after so many years. I need an explanation. I will not lead the people of our little Resistance mission- renting the hall, making hundreds of phone calls to announce the priest coming, etc ...I cannot do this knowing the close relationship Father has with that man and that man's fascination with the Devil. Somethings amiss.

I Posted this thread hoping Father might somehow hear of it and make answer.

1st Mansion Tenant · « **Reply #6 on:** March 03, 2013, 10:36:04 PM »

I don't think Fr. Pfieffer should be held accountable for Pablo's online rants. A priest knows many people, and not all of them are saints.Not unlike celebrities who attract people at both ends of the spectrum; they aren't to blame when a fan does something over-the top to get their attention. People were scandalized by Christ himself because He chose to associate with known sinners. But no one can say He was responsible for their sins. Did His friendship with those sinners cause some listeners to turn away from His message while He was here on Earth? Maybe so, but it didn't seem to worry Him. I doubt that Pablo is single-handedly capable of bringing down the Resistance because of his impassioned and often incomprehensible posts. That said, I think you have probably done the best thing, Matthew.

Dellery · « **Reply #7 on:** March 04, 2013, 09:49:53 AM »

Quote from: sspxbvm

Quote from: s2srea
Quote from: sspxbvm
This whole case with Pablo has given us all the more assurance that where we stand in the Resistance is the right way to go. Why else would Satan inject his influence so boldly? Into a small movement at that!

Forgive me SSPXBVM, but I often find that such logic is contrary to reason. I don't doubt the righteousness of the resistance, but this sort of thinking may lead people down dangerous roads. I honestly don't know what to make of the Paul Hernandez case at this point, other than viewing it for what it is.

I have not been as active/ up to date on this sight in recent months, but from what I could tell Mr. Hernandez has been a 'go to guy' for both Pfeiffer and the faithful whilst simultaneously betraying the weirdest of characters in so many of his responses. Why was this so? I am not demanding an explanation of any sort- but it would be good to know why. What he just full of time on his hands and the only who would offer support at this point? Something else?

What is this " logic" that is contrary to reason? What dangerous roads?

And in answer to another post. Yes. Matthew has dealt with that portion of the problem that has to do with his website. However, let's not be dumb sheep and follow blindly. We should demand an explantion as to why Fr. does nothing about you know who after so many years. I need an explanation. I will not lead the people of our little Resistance mission- renting the hall, making hundreds of phone calls to announce the priest coming, etc ...I cannot do this knowing the close relationship Father has with that man and that man's fascination with the Devil. Somethings amiss.

I Posted this thread hoping Father might somehow hear of it and make answer.

Making phone calls, renting halls, this all sounds like women's work.
All the while I'm sure your local Ordinary doesn't even know your name.

Fr. Pfeiffer need not answer to public sinners or sewing circle tough guys.

OHCA · « **Reply #8 on:** March 04, 2013, 11:44:51 AM »

Quote from: cantatedomino

. . . [Fr. Pfeiffer] did not take the warning signs or the personal warnings seriously, and so, in the end, the problem had to be taken care of by other men.

So that's it? The problem has been taken care of by Matthew's banishing him? Problem solved? Little more has been taken care of than the aesthetics of this forum. Meanwhile this nut-job Pablo is still on the loose doing a bang-up PR job IRL for the Resistance.

I personally do not attribute so high a level of connection between him and Fr. Pfeiffer as he has convinced most of you exists. His postings and his interview scream that he is a narcissistic dramatizer to the Nth degree. Maybe he occasionally drives for the good Father. But I suppose any business conducted in his presence was only because nobody thought he'd be able to remember two syllables afterwards.

But that's beside the point. People gobble up what an animated bull#####er like Pablo is spreading, going around grandiosing his "connection" with the good Father. So as long as this is going in IRL, the problem has not been taken care of and it is not the end of the problem.

I am grateful that Matthew banned him. That absolutely needed done. But I applaud the additional efforts, too, to make certain Father Pfeiffer is made aware of all of this, as the IRL problem is hardly solved by his forum banishment.

Quo Vadis Petre · « **Reply #9 on:** March 04, 2013, 11:55:54 AM »

It's true: only the forum is affected. Not until Fr. Pfeiffer clarifies the situation between him and Pablo will this incident be for the better or worse.