CathInfo.com

I am beginning to feel that the English speaking part of the resistance and the Spanish are isolated from each other to some degree because of language. It would do more people good to learn Spanish.

Fr. Bouchacourt the superior of the SSPX in South America gave an interview on the demonstration in the cathedral in Buenos Aires concerning the B'nai B'rith gathering and the false ecuмenism. For those not aware of the events here's what the SSPX English report says http://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/buenos-aires-rosary-protest-facts-2799

You can also find enough videos on YouTube. It was aimed at Pope Francis since he created the event when he was archbishop.

At first it appeared that the district superior was supporting the event. Then he gave an interview in Spanish here: http://statveritasblog.blogspot.com.br/2013/12/entrevista-al-superior-del-distrito-de.html?m=1

To highlight the parts of the interview Fr. Bouchacourt claims that what they (the faithful praying Rosaries in the cathedral for reparation for false ecuмenism) did was STUPID and he does not support it. He doesn't stop there. He goes on to say that the Jews were not guilty of deicide!!! Then at the end of the interview he is asked if he apologized and he replies that he sent a letter to the archbishop inviting him to dialogue.

...

1.- I’m from Latin America, where the incident occurred. I know some of the protagonists.

2.- I  have some absolutely reliable sources in Buenos Aires and in other parts of this district, some within the SSPX. These sources point out that Father Bouchacourt actually said that.

3.- In addition, Clarin is Argentina's most widely read newspaper, if Clarín had altered the words of Father Bouchacourt or had invented it, he would have made a denial, but there is none so far.

4.- It’s true that the interview published Sunday is quite after the others. In the Clarin’s interview, Father Bouchacourt changes position condemning the protest and absolving the Jews of deicide. Why? I think that Father Bouchacourt  had to fulfill this requirement made by Rome to the SSPX.

"Bowler is a man who believes John 3:5 as it is written."


"St. Augustine (City of God 13.7) says: "When any die for the confession of Christ without having received the washing of regeneration, it avails as much for the remission of their sins as if they had been washed in the sacred font of baptism."

St. Augustine (Tractate 74 on the Gospel of John): "He does an injury to a martyr who prays for him." This shows that martyrdom is believed to remit all sin and all punishment due to sin. "Later theologians commonly maintain that the baptism of blood justifies adult martyrs independently of an act of charity or perfect contrition, and, as it were, ex opere operato, though, of course, they must have attrition for past sins. The reason is that if perfect charity, or contrition, were required in martyrdom, the distinction between the baptism of blood and the baptism of desire would be a useless one. Moreover, as it must be conceded that infant martyrs are justified without an act of charity, of which they are incapable, there is no solid reason for denying the same privilege to adults. (Cf. Francisco Suárez, De Bapt., disp. xxxix.)