In case anyone has forgotten what this thread is about, we are waiting
for Hollingsworth to post the second half of this letter from Fr. Niklaus Pfluger:
Letter from Fr Pfluger to Bishop Williamson, Dec 27th, A.D. 2010
(translation dated: 1 January, 2011).
Your Excellency,
Dear Bishop Williamson,
For months I have been meaning to write to you in order to bring up
everything so to speak incomprehensible and also false in the things you
have been saying over the last few years. I put it off since you never
brought up arguments and obviously feel personally hurt – rather unusual for
a free-thinking man. But after I could not help reading in your latest “Eleison
Comments” that “World War III may not be far off”, I am now writing before
time becomes short, because one never knows when time will run out.
This prophecy of yours took my mind back to the after-dinner speeches at
the Episcopal Consecrations of 1988, After the main event all four newly
consecrated bishops said a few words. Bishop Tissier as usual was very
theological and dogmatic. Bishop de Galarreta was short and discrete. Bishop
Fellay was pastoral and balanced. But you were principally concerned with
war. Perhaps you were already thinking of World War III when you cried out
to the assembly, “It’s war, it’s war !”. At that time it was still the Russians who
were due to attack. It would be quite a task to count up all the times in the
last 22 years that you have prophesied with precise dates the Third World
War and the Chastisement. At least a dozen times for sure. A task also to
work out why you have never asked yourself the question whether your
forecasting arises from objective analysis and not rather from subjective
utopianism.
Alas, I know you do not ask yourself such questions. Nor do you ask why I,
and with me Menzingen and almost the entire Society of St Pius X and the
world while we are about it, why we merely shake our heads and are simply
disappointed. (I attach extracts from two e-mails, the first coming from a
former pupil of yours, the second from a German town mayor.) For you it is
clear. Always somebody else is to blame. Everybody else is clueless, blind to
reality, agents of some organization or other, be it Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ or the Mossad
or the CIA, most recently and emphatically “the Jews” – the list is long. In
brief, anybody who disagrees with you is either stupid or wicked or both. To
any of the people who have rejected your constant warnings of war and your
crude political and economic theories, and who have criticized you for them –
there are many such people, and some have even been offended -- have you
ever apologized ? Have you apologized to one single one ? Would you ever be
capable of saying, “I was wrong” ?
In fact that is a blatantly semitic [sic] way of thinking: to pin one’s own faults
on a scapegoat, which bears the guilty for everything. That is what Hitler did.
The Germans’ own defeat of November 9, 1918 produced a hatred for
international Jewry, which was responsible for all evil in the German nation and
therefore had to be “fought openly and without mercy”.
This problem is to be seen at another point in the latest “Eleison Comments”.
You wrote there: “Derivatives… act upon the delicate mechanisms of world
finance like weapons of mass destruction, because they easily fabricate an
unreal world of colossal and unpayable debt.” To which one smart [sic] reader
replied, “The Bishop is showing off – 'delicate mechanisms of world finance' --
as though he sees through the mechanisms of world finance and could point
out their weaknesses.” You could not do that. No more can you see through the
highly complex connections of politics, or the nαzιs’ mass-murder of Jews. You
have an opinion, then you look around for a few unconnected details which
somehow fit this opinion (for instance the “Leuchter Report”), and you hawk it
all as the truth...[/b][/color]
................(To be continued).................
We really ought to write to Fr. Pfluger and thank him for exposing his true
self this way, for now 'THE MASK IS OFF' and we don't have to wonder what
he is about nor who he really is, anymore.
Topic: A letter from Fr. Pfluger to Bp. Williamson, 1111 (Read 10952 times)