We came into the traditional movement through the SSPX. A decade later we left the apostolate, mainly because of the treatment the good bishop received at the hands of Bp. Fellay, Fr. Phluger and other priests of the Society. In spite of our departure from ++Lefebvre's apostolate, we could be persuaded to return to it. Despite the unjust and reprehensible manner in which +Williamson was ejected, and despite the revelation of grave sɛҳuąƖ scandals later, we would consider a return.
But the SSPX hierarchy would, first, have to crawl back to +Williamson and beg him to return. They would have to acknowledge that he was always the chief bishop in the movement, that he was always the primary voice of truth among them, that he reflected the archbishop's vision and goals better than any of the others. They would also have to cleanse the apostolate of embedded pedophile and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ priests, and they would have to sever from all Jєωιѕн influences, including a certain lawyer who, it appears, helps to govern their business and real estate decisions. What is more, they would have to abandon their whole "rebranding program, and consistently from the pulpit call out the fallen Roman church for what it really is.
Short of all these corrections, we would never for a moment consider coming back. None of these things will probably ever happen. So we are left stumble forward as best we can.
will