Even stgobnait on this forum stated clearly more and more SSPX laity also attend the Indult. I found it ironic as Fr Morgan stated not to attend the Indult. Alas, his pious union is now no better than the traitors, Archbishop Lefebvre spoke of. The FSSP and others.

I was always baffled to see 'Indult' newspapers being promoted outside SSPX chapels. Why did the clergy never take action against 'Catholic Voice' being promoted? The other pro-Jєωιѕн rag 'Alive' is also promoted.

Quote from: John Grace

Even stgobnait on this forum stated clearly more and more SSPX laity also attend the Indult. I found it ironic as Fr Morgan stated not to attend the Indult. Alas, his pious union is now no better than the traitors, Archbishop Lefebvre spoke of. The FSSP and others.

John, that then is really the point, The Society is now become a deluxe model of Ecclesia Dei faux Tradition.

The Krah matter though, stands outside of considerations of just the SSPX. It represents a visible and bold introduction of Jєωιѕн power and associations into Tradition itself. The scourge of Nostra Aetatism has consumed the Society and Rome and is seeking to pacify all pockets of resistance to itself.

True Catholics are the prey. It will eventually a response of fight or die for the truly faithful.

The SSPX are a fraud. They are the deluxe model you write of. I agree.

Of course the Krah business matters and in the wider realm of Tradition many were receptive.

I actually met people, who are not long attending the SSPX and are more concerned and aware than those attending for many years. Outside of the SSPX genuine truth seekers have not ignored this grave matter.

We all know the Jєωιѕн power holds over the Vatican and in society in general. The SSPX, who fought against International Jewry formally surrendered and over time have become weak. The late Erich Priebke spoke in his last interview of how Benedict XVI was afraid of the Jews.

The Jews won at Vatican II but sadly over the years Catholics have got soft in fighting these enemies.

The Jєωιѕн power increased because Catholics lost their way and haven't realised the fight.

It never occurs to these people that Bishop Fellay should be held to a standard of doctrinal perfection, yet Fr. Pfeiffer need not bother:

Bishop Fellay can (and should) be taken to task for his statements, but Fr. Pfeiffer is given a free pass when he pretends the AFD is official SSPX policy; that we can no longer attend SSPX Masses because that makes the SSPX the same as the FSSP; that Bishop Fellay wants to start a schism and back BXVI; etc.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

These people are like uber-accordistas: Unwilling to recognize the errors of a movement they identify with, for fear of hurting the "cause."

How is that any more honest than the accordistas?

PS: Also posted this in the "upside of Bishop Fellay's comments" thread, since it is relevant to both threads.

This is devolving into another "but he does it too" thread as is the other thread.  Ruminating over the faults and shortcomings of the two leaders is an unprofitable exercise.  It is time to move on to things that actually matter in the life and struggle of the Church.