neither the Newchurch of Vatican II, nor the “sedevacantists” against Vatican II (at least the dogmatic ones), nor the Newsociety following a different orientation from that of its Founder, Archbishop Lefebvre, have the right answer to the Church’s crisis

Grammatical analysis of this sentence indicates that he believes that the non-dogmatic SVs MIGHT "have the right answer to the Church's crisis".

From lasapiniere.info: https://www.lasapiniere.info/archives/2775

Last press release issued by the USML
by Abbé Olivier Rioult - Jul 8, 2017 - Abbé Rioult

Created in 2014, the Priestly Union Marcel Lefebvre (USML) brought together priests who denounced the subversion undertaken by the leaders of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X.

The three founding principles between the members of this union were:

(a) priestly friendship without hierarchical structure

(b) The fight against apostate Rome

(c) The rejection of any dogmatic sectarianism.

In recent months, several members, no longer assuming the requirements of the founding principles, have preferred to withdraw from the USML.

The last three members, gathered as planned, see these defections as an indication of Providence that it is no longer appropriate to maintain the existence of USML.

Indeed, the absence of legitimate authority and the lowering of characters all too often prevent the practice of the virtues necessary for the existence of a structure, however light it may be.

As Archbishop Lefebvre said: “From John XXIII, it can be said that we are no longer in a normal time of the Church” (cospec 111b, 1984). What to do?

Father Calmel very well defined the attitude that priests as well as laymen had to adopt in these abnormal times:

“The way, I believe, can enable the Christian struggle to reach its full scale by escaping internal conflicts and external rivalries is to lead it through small units, which know each other as they can, who are helping each other on occasion, but who refuse to enter into some systematic and universal organisations. In these various units, such as a modest school, a humble convent, a brotherhood of piety, a small grouping between Christian families, a pilgrimage organization, the authority is real and undisputed; the problem of the chief does not arise; the work to be done is precise. It is only a question of going to the end of one's grace and authority in the small sphere, of which one is certainly responsible, by keeping connected, without large administrative machines, to those who do the same. (Itineraries, Authority and Holiness in the Church, No. 149 – January 1971)

The experience of recent years shows us that the intuition of Father Calmel must not remain a view of the mind but must be accepted in its practical consequences.

For our part, we will therefore continue our Ministry in accordance with these same principles in collaboration with colleagues of good will.

Angers, 6 July 2017

Fr Nicolas Pinaud

Fr Olivier Rioult

Fr Pierre Roy

It has been well docuмented on this site that Fr Pierre Roy is now as sedevacantist bishop.

None of the bishops in 'tradition' claim authority.  They only confirm and ordain, etc.  I listened to a +Sanborn sermon this weekend and he said exactly that.

Rejection of any hierarchical structure is doomed for failure. The Church in her overall structure was founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ to be hierarchical.

What does rejection of dogmatic sectarianism means? Both Sanborn and Dolan were in communion at first, but now they are not due to the topic of the thesis and several other matters. Again doomed for failure and is nothing but jostling for authority. This is ultimately proven when Fr. Roy got himself consecrated a sedevacantist bishop.