Can anyone here not recognise Tradition?
Or in the Council Catholics’ perdition?

I don't think it's traditional to separate the message from the recipient. Those claiming to receive messages from Heaven have always been heavily scrutinized. Why would a message about Tradition be delivered to a N.O. nun?

1. Mary (and her Divine Son) would be pleased when ANY Catholic is heavily skeptical about private apparitions. It is what the Church teaches us to do. KEEP IN MIND that no private apparition, no private revelation is necessary for salvation. NONE OF THEM. God's work of Revelation was completed with the death of the last Apostle (St. John). Everything since then is just working out the details -- applying logic and reason to revelation, to spell it out more clearly. Making more explicit what was always believed.

2. Any private revelation, Marian or otherwise, post-1970 that fails to mention the Traditional Movement is suspiciously avoiding the elephant in the room.

It would be like Our Lord appearing to someone during the early Church persecutions, and speaking like He was still preaching in the countryside 30-33 AD, with no Roman persecution ongoing; failing to address the sufferings of His people, who are huddling in catacombs to keep the Faith; giving them zero encouragement. Could you imagine this? Me neither.

3. So this seems more like LARPing. The "seer" in question has heavily consumed *and internalized* the material of Sr. Faustina "Divine Mercy" over the years. She's probably read her works more times than I've read the Gospel of St. Matthew, and that's saying something. And guess what? Sr. Faustina's apparition told her to write stuff down too! What a coincidence! 

4. I know there is a danger of seeming biased, self-serving, prideful, etc. But let's be objective here. Something is either good or evil. I don't know about you, but I have ZERO doubts about the goodness of keeping the Catholic Faith in the bulwark of the Traditional Movement. Traditional Catholicism is nothing more or less than "Catholicism continued on past 1970". There are plenty of things I might be worried about at my Personal Judgment, but my time/money/efforts devoted to Tradition will CERTAINLY, yes CERTAINLY fall into the positive column. Just stating facts.

I'm not saying Our Lady has to specifically mention St. Dominic's Chapel here (which is probably 40 miles away from where these apparitions are supposedly taking place), but could she at least mention SOMETHING about the Traditional movement? No one is more faithful to her or her Divine Son than Traditional Catholics today, that's a fact. They have all the marks of her Son: obedience, humility, persecution, serving God faithfully, etc.

Even the rare "survivor" Novus Ordo Catholic, who has survived with the Faith, still is lacking SOME of these marks of Our Lord. Certainly the "persecution" element. No one persecutes Novus Ordo Catholics. The Conciliar Church has bent over backwards the last 50 years to shout to the world it no longer condemns them, and the Conciliar Church wants to be accepted by the world in return. So a "devout" N.O. Catholic can just show up to church at least, and go about their life with a lot more convenience and zero persecution, compared with a Trad Catholic of approximately equal "devotion".

2. Any private revelation, Marian or otherwise, post-1970 that fails to mention the Traditional Movement is suspiciously avoiding the elephant in the room.

THIS ^^^.

I’ve always held His Excellency in the highest regard but +Williamson’s near-obsession with private revelation and dubious apparitions has always confused and bothered me. Even if there’s nothing that explicitly contradicts the faith, there’s nothing of substance here that +Williamson couldn’t have said better in his own words without running the risk of potentially luring readers in to some strange apparition.

I remember once Bishop Tissier was asked about Fatima in an interview. He simply said “Fatima is private revelation so I don’t speak of it publicly.” At the time I was confused. But I understand his position now. Bishops have an incredible hold and influence on the faithful. If a traditional priest says something, most of us take it seriously. How much more a Bishop. Bishops need to be EXTREMELY careful what devotions they promote. It isn’t like you or I saying something off  the cuff at a coffee hour after Mass. people take +Williamson very seriously so I think he needs to do a better job of vetting things like this. If Bishop Tissier was unwilling to speak publicly about Fatima, a devotion with mountains of evidence about as close to “de fide” as a revelation like that can get, what does that say about +Williamson’s willingness to speak publicly about apparitions and visions like the one above…Just my two cents…

I fully agree.

On the bright side, it does show that we're not in a Bishop Williamson cult :)

I try to stay away from private revelation,  but why doesn't God let us know we are on the right page?  I feel like everything has been so silent for so long.  Anybody else feel sorta of abandoned?  I know we need to persevere,  but how much longer?

If you are doing your duties of state, you are on the right page. There is nothing more than this. Sanctification and close union with God comes from picking up the small and large crosses God has decided to place before us each and every day. Changing a diaper in the middle of the night. Staying late at work. Making the drive out to a Friday evening Mass when you’re exhausted from a long week.

The Catholic religion is stunningly simple. Don’t forget that it was made for peasants, simpletons, the common folk. There’s no secret revelation that’s going to come out and reveal some great secret that can’t be gained from doing your simple duty every day.

yes, God has at certain times made use of private revelation to instruct the Church, to warn us, etc. but the fact is our faith shouldn’t hinge or rely on any of these.

Thank you for the kind encouraging words.