Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Eleison Comments CDXXXVI (436) Nov. 22, 2015 A.D.  (Read 21559 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Eleison Comments CDXXXVI (436) Nov. 22, 2015 A.D.
« Reply #5 on: November 21, 2015, 07:59:12 PM »
Quote from: Pax Vobis
 Theoretically, the consecration can be valid, so there can be transubstantiation, just like at a black mass the consecration can be valid, so that satanists can blaspheme God to the highest degree.


I've never been to a black mass, BUT I understand to have a black mass they have to have a consecrated host to perform the sacrilage.
How could a satanist do a consecration unless he was a valid priest?
I don't believe Our Lord becomes present at the whim of a satanist !

Eleison Comments CDXXXVI (436) Nov. 22, 2015 A.D.
« Reply #6 on: November 21, 2015, 08:39:50 PM »
How can we be sure that the host came from a NO Mass?  They just assumed that was the case.


Eleison Comments CDXXXVI (436) Nov. 22, 2015 A.D.
« Reply #7 on: November 21, 2015, 08:59:21 PM »

Eleison Comments CDXXXVI (436) Nov. 22, 2015 A.D.
« Reply #8 on: November 21, 2015, 09:18:25 PM »
Quote from: NatusAdMaiora
Here is the link

https://www.youtube.com/embed/3gPAbD43fTI



Yes, let's believe what the pro-homo modernists tell us, let's trust them. At our own peril. To tell you the truth it looked like mold to me, not even remotely resembling the eucharistic miracle of  Lanciano.

Offline MaterDominici

  • Mod
  • Supporter
Eleison Comments CDXXXVI (436) Nov. 22, 2015 A.D.
« Reply #9 on: November 21, 2015, 09:25:05 PM »
Quote from: Recusant Sede
I'll suggest an answer, bishop Williamson, maybe your facts are wrong. Where are your sources for this? Bergoglio? Other modernists?


I wonder this too, especially considering the 3-year gap between the alleged miracle and their decision to investigate. I would like to know at what point in time all of this information was released to the public.

But...

Quote
If the NO service is a source of miracles, is valid and is apparently a source of graces, why doesn't he celebrate it? The man is a serious danger with talk like this.


I don't think it changes the practical application of how we should react to the N.O. We all know what a disaster it is and even a valid consecration wouldn't eliminate the many reasons to avoid N.O. Masses.