Author Topic: Eleison comments 380 October 25, 2014 (Read 40438 times)

Militia Jesu · « **Reply #230 on:** October 31, 2014, 03:07:17 PM »

Quote from: ultrarigorist

Quote from: Militia Jesu

Let's keep our eyes open as Dawn Marie heads to Boston KY this weekend and she might just increase the damage within the Resistance World.

Please expand on this!

I can't right now, we will have to wait.... preferably praying.

holmoak · « **Reply #231 on:** October 31, 2014, 03:09:10 PM »

Quote from: MaterDominici

Quote from: Ladislaus
So what exactly does Dawn Marie hope to gain from this besides publicity?

Is Bishop Williamson going to launch a Rosary Crusade among Resistance followers?

Good question. At what point did Our Lady return and say, "forget the SSPX, have Fr. Pfeiffer launch the crusade instead"?

Wouldn't it make more sense for DM to have dropped contact with Bp Williamson the minute he was kicked out of the SSPX since the request is that the SSPX be the facilitator of this rosary crusade?

No. She knows Bp. Williamson has nothing to do with calling for a crusade. According to her it is only the Superior of the SSPX who can fulfill the "request". She is still praying and hoping Bp. Fellay will comply.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #232 on:** October 31, 2014, 03:11:42 PM »

Quote from: holmoak

Quote from: MaterDominici
Quote from: Ladislaus
So what exactly does Dawn Marie hope to gain from this besides publicity?

Is Bishop Williamson going to launch a Rosary Crusade among Resistance followers?

Good question. At what point did Our Lady return and say, "forget the SSPX, have Fr. Pfeiffer launch the crusade instead"?

Wouldn't it make more sense for DM to have dropped contact with Bp Williamson the minute he was kicked out of the SSPX since the request is that the SSPX be the facilitator of this rosary crusade?

No. She knows Bp. Williamson has nothing to do with calling for a crusade. According to her it is only the Superior of the SSPX who can fulfill the "request". She is still praying and hoping Bp. Fellay will comply.

Thus my point about what the point of her visit to Boston, KY might be. What is she hoping to accomplish?

Maria Auxiliadora · « **Reply #233 on:** October 31, 2014, 03:16:02 PM »

Quote from: Ladislaus

Quote from: Militia Jesu
A couple of priests from Europe/South America --very friends of him-- think this is just a sort of veiled revenge against bishop Fellay. IMO that is a good guess, especially if one considers the opportunistic "visionary" knew exactly how to take advantage of all this.

Yep, that's how I read it. Bishop Williamson is simply using the vision narrative to bolster the position of the Resistance, to allege that the SSPX fell apart when Bishop Fellay refused to comply with Our Lady's demand because +Fellay felt that he had a better solution to the problem ... exactly as some of the pre-Vatican II popes did. Recall how in Part I Bishop Williamson explicitly cited a reference from the "Whole Truth About Fatima" along those lines. So, since the vision seems to impugn Bishop Fellay, hey, why not? It doesn't take a genius to draw the parallels.

I strongly disagree. +Williamson stated on E.C. 379:

Quote

Now in the 2010’s a parallel story has been coming to light of Our Lady appealing through a messenger to Bishop Fellay for the Society of St Pius X to organize a Rosary Crusade to pray for the Consecration of Russia to take place. If this story is true (as I believe it is, and some other priests also believe), it is worth telling in a few issues of these Comments, not to discredit Bishop Fellay (whose preference for human means is as understandable as that of Pius XI – God is their judge), but in order to emphasize how urgent the Consecration of Russia remains, and especially the devout practice of the five first Saturdays, even nigh on 100 years later. But is the story true? In particular, how reliable is the messenger?

I also know that +Williamson really liked the article by D. Drew precisely because it was very charitable towards +Fellay. No one can accuse +W of duplicity. Besides, on other E.C.s he has even been critical of the Resistance or perhaps I'm thinking of his sermon from Brazil on his last visit to the Monastery of Santa Cruz. There has to be another reason (whatever it is) but I believe it is honorable.

Matthew · « **Reply #234 on:** October 31, 2014, 03:17:11 PM »

MODERATOR NOTE: When upvoting/downvoting posts, you are saying "I want to see more posts like this" or "I want to see less posts like this".

NOT

"This post makes me feel happy" and "This post makes me feel sad"

Or, to put it more simply,

PLEASE DON'T SHOOT THE MESSENGER

Or no one will want to post "bad news" or controversial articles/posts on CathInfo, out of fear for their reputation score!

If I see someone get "crucified" for posting something like an Eleison Comments (which is historically VERY popular, and usually nets you some good upvotes) I will personally go in and remove the downvotes, and give them a little extra Rep points to restore justice.

Thank you.