[I have tried to attach the PDF file of this Virgo-Maria site.
Chapter 2 is very incriminating for Fr. Celier. He is described there in 2007as having
traveled all over France, with whose funding isn't clear, but it must have been the
contributions of the poor faithful, and his purpose was to spread the idea that a
accord with Rome is a good idea, based on liberal principles, which he described in
soft, pleasant language. He also tried to sell his book on the tour, but very few were
interested, and it is estimated that more than half of the meager sales were to
Frenchmen who wanted to read what this liberal's latest errors were. One critic
made detailed comments without even having to buy the book, for he flipped
through a sample copy to find enough to convince him he would be wasting his
money. ]
June 17, 2007: VM27 VM publishes "A diversion of Father Celier’s campaign - His remarkable flop at
the Sofitel-Antigone in Montpellier".
"The fight for the faith changes form,” declares the director of Fideliter. Father Celier’s fellow
priests are spreading pitiful, poisoning disinformation of on the La Porte Latine web site. Montpellier
was a total failure! The lecture began with 20 minutes delay for lack of a crowd. Father Celier
nervously counted the handful of faithful that had bothered to come. In a room of 100 seats, rented
(by whom?) for about 650 Euros in the luxurious hotel Sofitel-Antigone in Montpellier (according to
information from the hotel), were present: 2 Fathers (Father Vernoy who is the prior and Father
Jérôme, formerly belonging to the Barroux monastery, who has recently been reintegrated in the SSPX,
but who was curiously left in the region of his former monastery), 2 nuns and 26 faithful amongst whom
4 strong opponents who did not stop asking very embarrassing questions to Father Celier, notably on
his use of pseudonyms such as Father Michel Beaumont or Paul Sernine. He refused to say who hid
himself behind the pseudonym of Father Michel Beaumont until the man asking the question revealed it
publicly to the faithful present. Father Vernoy furiously threatened Father Celier’s young opponent
to get him out of the room, but it was in vain. The question concerning the state of schism of the
conciliar authorities was evaded. To explain the choice of his person by the Entrelacs Editions, he
stated that he is a parish priest of the SSPX, who "masters writing"! He asserted that Bishop Fellay
had granted him his "imprimatur" to publish his book. Besides, he did not stop repeating that he was
not “too tired to write this book" for he had only "plagiarized Bishop Fellay"! According to another
source, there were only 22 persons present at Father Celier’s lecture in Perpignan on June 12, 2007, the
majority coming from the circles of Ecclesia Dei. This was a tremendous failure. It is time to make a
balance of Father Celier’s failed campaign of France. All in all, it has been hard to get more than 450
faithful together in the ten priories where it was for 6 weeks. Among the listeners, an important part
consisted of opponents who have shown their disapproval to him. Father Celier has sold scarcely more
than some one hundred works. And the expenses have risen to several thousands Euros. Father Celier
works with two Conciliar "bishops"!
Father Celier opposes himself to Archbishop Lefebvre while
declaring: “The fight for the faith changes form. This book is in line with this transformation."[That's on page 15. This is very interesting material!
Page 16 shows an archive sheet from the 1967 voting for the content of the Novus Ordo liturgy. The explanation goes as follows]:
The text above is an extract of the archives of the Conciliar Liturgical Consilium28 that prepared the new rite
of the mass promulgated by Paul VI in 1969.
This archive docuмent shows that the text is a pure composition of 1967, of which every fragment of the
new words of the "consecration" was subjected to a vote in the meeting (counting of the Placet).
Now in his Motu Proprio, the apostate priest Ratzinger-Benedict XVI asserts that it would be a matter of the
"unique Roman rite", and that this new rite, in reality a product of drafts and of voting sentence by
sentence in 1967, to be found in the official archives, should be the "ordinary form" of this "unique rite"
of which the traditional rite promulgated by Saint Pius V should be nothing but the "extraordinary form":
_________________________________________________________________
28
http://www.rore-sanctifica.orghttp://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-07-09-B-00-Cuisine_Consilium.pdfhttp://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-FLASH-2007-07-14-D-00-Unique-Rite_et_Vote.pdfhttp://www.rore-sanctifica.org/bibilotheque_rore_sanctifica/02-reforme_de_1968_et_suivante-consilium-groupe_xx/1965-1968_-_Consilium_-_Botte_-_Lecuyer/Schemata_N-218.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-07-10-A-00-Mgr_Lefebvre_validite_NOM.pdfhttp://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/Reflexions_NOM_Mgr_Guerard_1977.pdf16
[This is B16 writing in Summorum Pontificuм]:
"Art. 1. The Roman Missal promulgated by Paul VI is the ordinary expression of the "lex orandi “of the
Catholic Church of the Latin rite. The Roman Missal promulgated by S. Pius V and reprinted by the B.
John XXIII must be considered as the extraordinary expression of the same “lex orandi” of the Church
and is to be honored because of its venerable and antique usage. These two expressions of the"lex
orandi" of the Church do not produce any division of the "lex credendi” of the Church; they are, in fact,
two implementations of the single Roman rite."29
These public affirmations of the apostate priest Ratzinger-Benedict XVI are therefore
pure lies, contradicted
by the textual and scientific study of the archives. This is indeed a tremendous intellectual imposture, very
informative on the degree of corruption of this German university scholar that succeeded in taking control of
the heritage of the Catholic Church.
It is this same text of the "Motu Proprio," containing this disgusting historic and intellectual imposture that
Bishop Fellay rejoiced about, obliging the clergy of the SSPX to partake in his gladness and to sing of
Te Deum.
By behaving thus, with such disdain of the facts, and by supporting this liturgical fraud by his foul behavior,
Bishop Fellay has blessed this democratic voting by "placet" of the very words of the “consecration" of what
he recognized henceforth to be the "ordinary form" of the "unique Roman rite."
If Archbishop Lefebvre had had knowledge of the archives of the conciliar liturgical Consilium, laid down in
Trent, published on internet thanks to the site
www.rore-sanctifica.org30 at the beginning 2006, he would
have raised his voice against such sacrilegious behavior leading "to democratically choose" the words of the
Consecration.
It is unheard-of and impious that Bishop Fellay, whom Archbishop Lefebvre raised to the episcopate in
1988, has been able to betray him and his work, to
adhere to the impious liturgical projects of clerical
masons, to celebrate them himself in the media, and to oblige all SSPX priories to sing the Te Deum for
such a blasphemous and subversive undertaking.
Has Bishop Fellay lost his mind?
Alternatively, might he himself31 have entered the Lodge and defend henceforth his Masonic “brothers"
and their projects of dechristianization?29
http://www.cef.fr/catho/actus/archives/2007/20070607summorum_pontificuм.pdf
30http://www rore-sanctifica.org/etudes/2007/RORE_2007-03-
31_Les_10_Cartons_des_Archives_officielles_du_Consilium_et_des_Schemata.pdf
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-04-04-A-00-Photos_Consilium_1.pdfhttp://www.virgo-maria.org/articles_HTML/2007/004_2007/VM-2007-04-11/Cleri_sanctitati-Pie_XII-2_juin_1957.pdf31 In 1999 he himself still denounced in a German video “the four special lodges, reserved to clergymen, which
What has happened to him since the year 2000 and the pilgrimage of the SSPX to Rome that he had organized that year???
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2006/VM-2006-11-01-A-00-Mgr_Fellay_denonce_quatre_loges_au_Vatican.pdfhttp://www.virgo-maria.org/Docuмents/eveques/mgr-fellay/VM-Mgr_Fellay_denonce_quatre_loges_au_Vatican htm
32
http://www.virgo-maria.org/articles/2007/VM-2007-10-16-B-00-Commission-theologique.pdf.
Topic: Dirty political campaign (Read 5909 times)