Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Deviant sɛҳuąƖ behavior defended by SSPX school in the UK  (Read 12900 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Deviant sɛҳuąƖ behavior defended by SSPX school in the UK
« Reply #5 on: September 09, 2017, 12:18:09 PM »
Condoning and/or promoting mortal sin is NEVER ok. Deep deep corruption in the SSPX is no surprise, but deviant and immoral? It was only a matter of time, like one foot follows the other.
I have no intention of condoning this matter. If what was written is perceived as such, I retract what was said.  What I mean to say is what do you do if the superiors "think" this is neccesary in order to deal with an already rampant and out of hand situation?
If anything, everyone should send them e-mails telling them how disgraceful their polocies are, instead of just lingering around the net being outraged and engaging in useless banter. "Action speaks louder then words," and sending and e-mail and saying a prayer is better then sitting here reading this.

Re: Deviant sɛҳuąƖ behavior defended by SSPX school in the UK
« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2017, 12:24:34 PM »
I have no intention of condoning this matter. If what was written is perceived as such, I retract what was said.  What I mean to say is what do you do if the superiors "think" this is neccesary in order to deal with an already rampant and out of hand situation?
If anything, everyone should send them e-mails telling them how disgraceful their polocies are, instead of just lingering around the net being outraged and engaging in useless banter. "Action speaks louder then words," and sending and e-mail and saying a prayer is better then sitting here reading this.
Agreed.


Re: Deviant sɛҳuąƖ behavior defended by SSPX school in the UK
« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2017, 02:11:06 PM »
It's a docuмent every school in the United Kingdom is required to have. I have done the research and searched the title of the docuмent. Multiple schools in the UK come up, all with the selfsame docuмent, layout and wording. The only thing different, of course, is the school's insignia. They're not defending anything, they're required by UK law to have that docuмent.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Deviant sɛҳuąƖ behavior defended by SSPX school in the UK
« Reply #8 on: September 09, 2017, 02:22:09 PM »
Well I understand that Fr. S had removed that page, and that once he left, the page was re-instated.

If he were still there, I bet that docuмent would still be gone. And the school would still be functioning just fine!


But even if it were required by law (and 100% enforced), I'd still have to ask: Is this what we've come to? To operate schools, we must "officially" condone deviant behavior, even if "unofficially" we speak against it?

This smacks of a compromise; the proverbial "grain of incense" offered to a false god. Like the priests of England submitting to the King as the head of the "Church of England" instead of the Pope. It might seem like a small thing, but it's not. It's a sellout.

Isn't this the first step down a slippery slope? What about teachers who are lukewarm to begin with -- they'll look at this docuмent, and think the school is "mainstream liberal" and begin to act accordingly.

At first, it's a legal technicality. But as time goes on, more and more teachers will read it and take it seriously -- having failed to "get the memo" -- and the liberal snowball will continue to roll downhill faster and faster, picking up steam.

I suppose in some countries, which are as wretched as Great Britain, good Catholics are called upon by God to homeschool their children. Apparently even private school is out.

Re: Deviant sɛҳuąƖ behavior defended by SSPX school in the UK
« Reply #9 on: September 09, 2017, 03:48:07 PM »
Wait... they HAVE TO? What the Hades about "RELIGIOUS LIBERTY"? I heard England subscribes to that, don't they? They should be able to protest that "necessity".
   "You are free to believe that X is immoral, but you still have to accept it because you're not allowed to do anything about it." Does that make sense?
   So, one law implies you can reject something while another law says you can't reject what the other law prctically says you can. And if you have to pick one to follow you mandatorily have to go with the one that is prohibitive... Legalities impress me; it's all lies, hypocrisy, and contradiction. Are there any others who see this?
   If one was part of a religion that offers human sacrifice, but was arrested for "murder/homicide," is that not an infringement of his/her religious beliefs? That is inconsistent. The laws should be clear, explicit, and non-contradictory. Is that too much to ask? Yes, it probably is.