Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Deviant sɛҳuąƖ behavior defended by SSPX school in the UK  (Read 13724 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PG

Re: Deviant sɛҳuąƖ behavior defended by SSPX school in the UK
« Reply #55 on: September 19, 2017, 01:53:24 PM »
tkgs - Agreed.  If they still have it in the fine print, then that is double worse.  And, I think it is likely something official like this would be in printed form.  

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Deviant sɛҳuąƖ behavior defended by SSPX school in the UK
« Reply #56 on: September 24, 2017, 07:01:52 PM »
You can't commit "detraction" against a public organization.

Sins of the tongue are serious insofar as they are against the charity we owe our neighbor, who has a right to his good reputation.
By telling true (private) things, or even lies, against his good name, we damage his good name and thus commit sin.

But the SSPX is an organization and is quite public.

It's not even detraction (which is telling the truth, rather than a lie) because this is not a private sin. It's a public sin.

But again, it's the public sin of an organization -- so the rules of charity, giving the benefit of the doubt, etc. do not apply.

But I'm wasting my time talking to you, since you think +Fellay isn't selling out to Rome! That's rich.

P.S. You can believe whatever you want about me or others in the Resistance. But the fact is that I was a huge defender and supporter of the SSPX, even spending 3.5 years of my life in one of their seminaries. Use your noggin! You can't be more dedicated than to give your whole life to an organization (or at least OFFER your life, and BE WILLING to give your life). After I was dismissed for no particular reason, I volunteered as a layman (in several departments) at whatever chapel I attended and was extremely active and supportive (especially time but also money) at several SSPX chapels over many years.

I wasn't looking for a reason to grumble, be discontent, etc. I always got along with everyone. I was optimistic and was looking for the continued growth, success, and expansion of the SSPX.

...until the sellout began.

Matthew


On 09/24/2017 06:36 PM, (name withheld) wrote:

Quote
Dear Matthew, 
We talked a while ago I don't know if you remember me. Regarding the post you made about Saint Michaels academy in England
I'd like to say this. We don't know WHAT happened. It seems as if always the Resistance has always something to attack the
sspx on. The post you posted is a mortal sin of detraction. This should have been brought up to the District superior of
England and that's it. But now that it's gone this far, there is no excuse. It is plain in simple. This is detraction.
Please stop attacking the sspx. Fellay isn't compromising with Rome... think before you speak.
God bless you brother.
(Name withheld)

Sancte Pie Decime
Ora Pro Nobis!
AMDG



Re: Deviant sɛҳuąƖ behavior defended by SSPX school in the UK
« Reply #57 on: September 24, 2017, 07:56:45 PM »
But I'm wasting my time talking to you, since you think +Fellay isn't selling out to Rome! That's rich.

http://www.correctiofilialis.org/signatories/

I would encourage you to take a brief glance through the names (or ctrl+f "fellay").

Re: Deviant sɛҳuąƖ behavior defended by SSPX school in the UK
« Reply #58 on: September 25, 2017, 06:13:07 AM »
While Society schools are not wittingly in the forefront of the ongoing sɛҳuąƖ revolution, they nevertheless are faced with progressive secular legislation and their licence to operate will depend on a level of compliance. It would seem any religious school nowadays has become a place where conflicting sets of morals are taught and as a result children become adults highly confused or indifferent. Social engineers know very well that children are great instruments of change and schools therefore are the first places to target. Unless they are vigorously challenged at the expense of being closed down, the religious character of the school becomes nominal and will reflect a culture in decline.

Conservatives should by now know better than to look to Rome for confirmation of traditional values applied to marriage and family. Rome is a reformed and reforming institution which is not unwilling to be part of the sɛҳuąƖ revolution. Bergoglio while posturing as a pope is helping to redefine marital and gender roles and is a great enemy of the Church. They are on a hiding to nothing with their weak half-hearted petitions; they and the organisations they represent will sooner or later comply with the spirit of the age. This is what conservatives do. They fear the disruption a real counter-revolution would cause to the status quo and vote to keep it in place if the pace of change can be slowed.