Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 12

Author Topic: Church Militant TV  (Read 7833 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Church Militant TV
« Reply #35 on: March 11, 2021, 11:01:13 AM »
Quote from: Incredulous on March 09, 2021, 04:53:34 PM
That’s it.

They willingly cross the line of their human nature and identify it as a time of liberation.  They embrace the sin crying to Heaven for justice.

They’re blinded to understand their true enslavement.

Yes, he seemed very happy ... outwardly ... as if this huge burden of having to fight or "suppress" his ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ urges had been lifted.  He THINKS he's free, but it's quite the opposite.  Perhaps he should talk to Milo or Voris.

Sounds as if he's also lost his faith, or, rather, he's "suppressed" it in order not to have it nagging his conscience.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Church Militant TV
« Reply #36 on: March 11, 2021, 11:05:23 AM »
Quote from: hollingsworth on March 11, 2021, 10:48:21 AM
I see nothing dishonest in CM reporting.  If there is dishonest reporting going on here, then, personally, I would like to know about it in order to stand corrected.

Did you even watch the Palmquist video?  He asserts that nearly all of it is wrong and was clearly spun to serve their agenda.  He's no friend of the SSPX and wasn't defending them, focusing solely on Voris' report about him.

Voris reported that the rector and staff at STAS KNEW about Palmquist's ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity ... which Palmquit categorically denies.  He said he spent his entire time there "suppressing" his urges and showed no open signs of it.  He discussed it with his spiritual director, but rectors do not make ordination decisions based on internal forum (Confession or spiritual direction).

So Palmquist rejects the VERY POINT of the Voris piece.  It wasn't primarily about:  "hey a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ got ordained" but, rather, "the SSPX KNOWINGLY ORDAINED a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ."  So the entire point he was trying to make re: Palmquist simply collapses.

Logged

Offline Alexandria

Re: Church Militant TV
« Reply #37 on: March 11, 2021, 12:02:22 PM »
Quote
Sloniker was a layman.  I don't see that the SSPX can peak into every truck he drives and snoop into the private life of the people who attend mass.
Kevin was booted out of the novitiate for trying to circuмcise himself.  That bit of information should have been passed down to the priests at the sspx chapel he attended.  Instead, they made him head of the altar boys and then sent him off to the boys' camp as a counselor.

He clearly was a disturbed young man and not fit for any of these positions of trust.
Logged

Offline Yeti

  • Supporter
Re: Church Militant TV
« Reply #38 on: March 11, 2021, 12:41:34 PM »
Quote from: hollingsworth on March 11, 2021, 10:48:21 AM
I see nothing dishonest in CM reporting.  If there is dishonest reporting going on here, then, personally, I would like to know about it in order to stand corrected.
Could you please read this thread again and watch Palmquist's video. Palmquist denies numerous things Michael Voris said in the video. Almost everything in Voris' video, actually.
Logged

Offline Yeti

  • Supporter
Re: Church Militant TV
« Reply #39 on: March 11, 2021, 01:10:01 PM »
Here is a rather long excerpt from Palmquist's video, in which he explains the dishonesty of Church Militant:
.

Quote
This so-called news agency that is called Church Militant, which is a very interesting name, they found out about my story within a few weeks after starting my social media. [...] One of their goals is to attack that community that I was a part of. So when they found out that I had left, they probably thought they would find some juicy info. I was part of the ranks. I was a priest, so I could probably give them some information that would help fuel their attacks. And especially when they found out that I was now an openly gαy person, they thought, "Perfect!" because one of their main attacks towards the community that I was a part of is abuse of minors by the priests, and they make a connection between those people who are predators and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs being allowed to become priests. One of the journalists, Miss Christine Niles, she came to me in a message that I will put up here. She asked me questions that were obviously leading questions. They wanted me to say that, "Oh, it's not your fault. It's the superiors' fault that allowed you, a poor, poor ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ man to go through, to become a priest. Isn't that right? Didn't the priests know that you were ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, and they let you go anyway?" She never mentioned that she was a journalist. She never mentioned her intentions. [...] I thought, "Oh, that's a very interesting question to ask me." And then I looked on her page and realized who she was and who she worked for. Church Militant. And of course at that point I had practically zero trust for people in general but specifically for people that were a part of that world, the traditional Catholic world. I declined to respond, and she immediately said that I was "defending my community." Whatever. I brushed it off. A few months later Miss Christine Niles hosts this on her social medias. [...]
.
Everything that she asked me in that initial contact, that I declined to answer, in this video Michael Voris (another character) uses the questions and my non-response as the truth.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 12
« previous next »