Sorry, no cigar. It is not a question at this point of "policing" errant Society priests or misbehaving laity. Most of the cases involving pervert SSPX priests and laity were, (and are), known by the SSPX leaders right up to the top. Far from being shot by "firing squad," great pains have been taken by the Society to cover up and hide them away. Only when forced by the investigative reporting of CM were a few of these priests turned over to the authorities. Only when parents of abused children stepped forward and loudly complained was any action taken to expose and correct the situation.
The Society has, at all costs, endeavored to protect a false image of traditional Catholic probity, completely separated from the corrupt New Church mainstream. Most of the SSPX faithful had no idea, for decades, that these evil things were going on until Michael Voris and Christine Niles began to expose them in April of 2020.
Matto recognizes the "smoke of sơdơmy." He admits it openly. But, alas, he goes on to complain, "If only we had honest reporters to do this investigation." I see nothing dishonest in CM reporting. If there is dishonest reporting going on here, then, personally, I would like to know about it in order to stand corrected.
Which is what I said.
I said the worst aspect so far was the cover up.
But just about every organisation covers it up. Do you think for example if a high profile Opus Dei priest was guilty of abuse, or CM had ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ abuse happen on one of its Lenten cruises or retreats at sea they would not cover it up?
They covered up Voris's ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ lifestyle over 20 years for the first 12 years of his pencil twirling condemnations of Bishops.
They are the pot calling the kettle black. But I don't deny the kettle is black.