I find this demand to be rather strange:

Make up your mind. Choose.

Either you write in public, to all those people that you normally write to, that you have been wrong to deny the possibility of Eucharistic miracles at Novus Ordo Masses, and you quote several cases of such miracles which you now admit to have taken place. And you will have to persuade me that you sincerely mean what you write, and that you are not writing it just to deceive me. Judging by your past behavior that will be very difficult for you to do. And I have to remain the judge as to whether you may or may not have done it. And if you try any form of weaseling out of it, I will never again read an email of yours. Choose.

Or you find yourself a bishop who agrees with you. How about Bishop Pfeiffer?

In Christ,

Bp. Williamson

It does seem to indicate that Bishop Williamson would give him the Holy Oils if he were to publicly agree not only in the "possibility" that NO Eucharistic miracles have taken place but to cite "several case" where he admits that they HAD taken place.  I have to say this is bizarre, to make this a condition for receiving Holy Oils.  Who doesn't know that belief in miracles and private revelations is not obligatory?  If Bishop Williamson had other, deeper, problems with Father Hewko, that would be one thing ... but to fixate on something this trivial?

I find this demand to be rather strange:
It does seem to indicate that Bishop Williamson would give him the Holy Oils if he were to publicly agree not only in the "possibility" that NO Eucharistic miracles have taken place but to cite "several case" where he admits that they HAD taken place.  I have to say this is bizarre, to make this a condition for receiving Holy Oils.  Who doesn't know that belief in miracles and private revelations is not obligatory?  If Bishop Williamson had other, deeper, problems with Father Hewko, that would be one thing ... but to fixate on something this trivial?

You’re in a rut.  This has already been explained to you.

Consider that both Fr. Hewko and Bp. Williamson were subjected to occult curses from a Santeria Warlock.

1. Fr. Hewko was exposed to Cuban voodoo for 7 years.

2. Bp. Williamson surely suffered an attack when he stayed at the Pfeiffer farm in 2013.
    (HE starts condoning the Novus ordo missae in the late Fall of 2015).
   
3. Even Bp. Tissier was exposed to a Santeria malefice, when Pablo crashed his Chicago priory living quarters around 2015.

Make no mistake. 
Infiltration of traditional Catholic venues and Santeria curses are the only thing that makes the demonically inspired, Mexican warlock tick.

Wasn't Fr. Chazal with Fr. Pfeiffer's group at one time? Maybe I'm not remembering that correctly. 

Wasn't Fr. Chazal with Fr. Pfeiffer's group at one time? Maybe I'm not remembering that correctly.

Don't get confused.


Fr. Chazal calls his group the MC-SPX

That name is superficially similar to what Fr. P called his group (SSPX-MC). But there is no connection.

It was pointed out to him that this could confuse people. They both have "Marian Corps" in the name.

Sean, the OP shows that the reason Fr. Hewko wants the Holy Oil is for extreme unction: "Your Excellency, all I'm requesting are the basic tools for saving souls! Baptisms and Extreme Unctions cannot be given without Holy Oils (aside from emergency baptisms). Why would a differing opinion be an obstacle to receiving Holy Oils?"

When a soul is in their last agony, even a heretical, excommunicated apostate priest who hates and always slanders +Williamson can validly administer Extreme Unction. All I will say, and I hate to say it, is +Williamson will be in big trouble with Our Lord if it ends up that a soul in need of the sacrament does not receive it due to his decision. 

As greatly as I respect +Williamson, he is gravely wrong here. He just is.

The ends don’t justify the means.

According to your rationale, every bishop is required to give oils to every priest who comes knocking, no matter what crazy and/or heretical positions he holds (eg., Pope Michael, or Palmar de Troya), simply because these renegades have duped some faithful.

But giving such renegades oils only enables their poisoned ministry, and THAT is what a bishop needs to worry about (particularly when Hewko’s dupes have many other priests from whom they can receive extreme unction, but choose not to).  If they choose to exclude all those priests because of Hewko’s indoctrination, that’s on them, not Williamson.

The ends don’t justify the means.

According to your rationale, every bishop is required to give oils to every priest who comes knocking, no matter what crazy and/or heretical positions he holds (eg., Pope Michael, or Palmar de Troya), simply because these renegades have duped some faithful.

But giving such renegades oils only enables their poisoned ministry, and THAT is what a bishop needs to worry about (particularly when Hewko’s dupes have many other priests from whom they can receive extreme unction, but choose not to).  If they choose to exclude all those priests because of Hewko’s indoctrination, that’s on them, not Williamson.

No, that is not at all my rationale and you're allegiance to +Williamson is clouding clear thinking. Do you think Fr. Hewko is going to sell it or use the Holy Oil for frying fish or quieting a squeaky wheel? Of course not - there is no good reason to withhold it, certainly not the reason +Williamson gave, there is only good reason to give it.

It is only if +Williamson suspected the Holy Oil would in some way be misused would he be justified in withholding it - and he should say what that reason is. But with the way things are in this day and age, +Williamson is just plain wrong. 

If it were you (or one of yours) who needed the sacrament and Fr. Hewko was the only priest who could get to you, guaranteed you'd be singing a different tune - in the next world.

A gratuitous post which ignores the substance of my response.

No, what I said answers directly your response, otoh, you are blinding yourself for the sake of defending the good bishop whom *we all* care deeply for.

You're lumping of Fr. Hewko as a renegade priest is irrelevant, even tho I agree he's a renegade, he is still a priest and can save a dying soul - IF he has the holy oil to do it.

 

You’re in a rut.  This has already been explained to you.

Your "explanation" was clearly false.  Here Bishop Williamson explicitly states that he would give him the Holy Oils on the condition that he publicly came out and assented to the legitimacy of "several" NO "Eucharistic miracles".  There are no other conditions laid out.